It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SpearMint
Per 100k population is just as fair as percentages. There is a very strong correlation between guns and murder rates, it is obviously the cause, but that can't be proven unless someone magically made all guns vanish. If you've seen the numbers and still don't believe guns are the cause of your extremely high murder rate, then you must be in denial. It's obvious.
Originally posted by letseeit7
reply to post by manmental
To keep our govt. in check , take away the guns and only criminals will have them . Many reasons , protection from criminals . People will always find ways to kill each other . Do you know that more people are killed with baseball bats than guns ! Lets ban those bats.
The evidence is clear -- the more guns are out there, the more likely they will be used to take a life.
About 1.4 million guns, or an annual average of 232,400, were stolen during burglaries and other property crimes in the six-year period from 2005 through 2010.
On average, firearms were stolen in an annual average of about 4% of the 2.4 million burglaries occurring each year, in 2% of the 529,200 robberies, and in less than 1% of the 13.6 million other crimes involving theft from 2005 through 2010.
From 2005 through 2010, 86% of burglaries and 75% of other property crimes involving a stolen firearm were reported to police.
Originally posted by CudiTheKid
Originally posted by SpearMint
Per 100k population is just as fair as percentages. There is a very strong correlation between guns and murder rates, it is obviously the cause, but that can't be proven unless someone magically made all guns vanish. If you've seen the numbers and still don't believe guns are the cause of your extremely high murder rate, then you must be in denial. It's obvious.
Not really. You didn't take many things into account like quality of education or income inequality. The U.S. does not fare very well in categories like these, especially when you start to look at the poor Americans (an ever increasing number), which are the ones committing most of the crimes. We have almost as many people in poverty as the UK population. I bet you can make a strong correlation between murder rates and income inequality. I see UK, Canada, Australia in blue, it's no surprise they don't have the murder rate the U.S. does.
Originally posted by SpearMint
I don't see why that matters, guns are still the problem regardless of why people are using them.
"I bet you can make a strong correlation between murder rates and income inequality."
It's you that needs to do that.
Originally posted by CudiTheKid
Originally posted by SpearMint
I don't see why that matters, guns are still the problem regardless of why people are using them.
"I bet you can make a strong correlation between murder rates and income inequality."
It's you that needs to do that.
I was using the general "you". I'm not going to spend my time doing that. Guns aren't the problem, the society is the problem. If we took guns away, our knife murders would skyrocket. It's the people and the environment, not the tools.edit on 14-12-2012 by CudiTheKid because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SpearMint
Well then you have no point if you're not willing to back it up.edit on 14-12-2012 by SpearMint because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by CudiTheKid
Originally posted by SpearMint
Well then you have no point if you're not willing to back it up.edit on 14-12-2012 by SpearMint because: (no reason given)
No my point stands, look at the map and some of the numbers presented in this and other threads. There is a clear correlation, Im just not going to waste my time figuring it out for every country. Your point is wrong, you point only to guns, when clearly there is much more to the situation than just that.
Originally posted by SpearMint
But there's nothing to say the gun murders are due to income inequality.
The Bath School disaster is the name given to three bombings in Bath Township, Michigan, on May 18, 1927, which killed 38 elementary school children, two teachers, four other adults and the bomber himself; at least 58 people were injured. Most of the victims were children in the second to sixth grades (7–11 years of age [1]) attending the Bath Consolidated School. Their deaths constitute the deadliest mass murder in a school in U.S. history and the third-deadliest non-military massacre in U.S. history, behind 9/11 and the Oklahoma City bombing.
Originally posted by manmental
guns are #... why would anyone defend them?
Originally posted by manmental
This is a general conspiracy.
And a question to all American ATS-ers.
Why the frig does the US insist on having guns given the hellish result of guns?
I live in the UK and I am horrified by mass gun killings and the USA breeds them.
Why doesn't the USA ban guns?
That is the BIG CONSPIRACY I am harking too.
Your black president cries but allows gun laws to continue.
What gives USA?