It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bknapple32
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
Have you noticed the backtracking from 'end of the world' to 'a new age' ?
Since nothing can be created nor destroyed, 'end' literally mean 'change'. And if the world changes, it will bring a new age, correct?
I fail to see where the backtracking is, unless you mean the part where people are correcting themselves and understanding the phrase for what it truly means.
This is what I'm talking about. END of the world means what it means. If it meant change, then change would be the word used. If a game ENDS, it doesn't change, it STOPS, it CEASES to be.
"Skin for skin!" Satan replied. "A man will give all that he has to save his own life." Job 2:4
Originally posted by bknapple32
If you asked people back in 2006 or even 2008, most who believe in Dec 21, 2012 would have mostly said its the end of the world. But now lately that sentiment seems to have shifted to "it will be a new spiritual awakening'.
I can't really pinpoint when this change occurred but it has happened slowly. What I want to know is why? Is it because the date has been coming quickly and you don't want to promise such a big thing, so you back track a little? I mean, saying it is the end of the world is bold claim and hard to argue ambiguity. But to say a spiritual awakening... is kind of... a cop out. Because what is a spiritual awakening? I would argue such a thing is much different for everyone. An awakening for me could be worlds different than one for you. There's no way to argue whether or not 'it' happened. It allows for people to come here or talk to their friends and family on Dec 22nd and save some face.
Maybe I'm being too cynical on this. I'm not trying to be. But Look at it a different way. If I promise you ''3 things to say in a job interview, and if said, you will get the job''... But then as I'm driving you to the interview I say ''well it depends on HOW you say those things. I cant promise what the interviewer will do if you say them wrong'' That would be backtracking. I look at it as the same thing. The majority claimed end of the world. And now I see far more spiritual outcomes as predictions. A highly ambiguous difference.
Note- this isn't for people who said it was a spiritual awakening the whole time. I get there's exceptions to every rule, but you all cant be the exception.edit on 25-11-2012 by bknapple32 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by BlueMule
I think that over the next couple of weeks there will be many lame-ass fools with dumb avatars making threads just like this. I'm sick of it already.
Originally posted by WhoKnows100
The media did its job - used it's pulpit to push the "fear meme". Fear herds. Fear pushes. Fear drives.
"Skin for skin!" Satan replied. "A man will give all that he has to save his own life." Job 2:4
Drove many of the fearful where? To the New Age movement which has always preached;
"ascension"
"spiritual awakening"
"global consciousness"
"spiritual evolution"
"the Christ consciousness"
"evolution of consciousness"
"the divinity within"
"dimensional uplift"
Satan doesn't change - he still motivates through fear of death.
Bottom line is that we live in a hostile universe where life is a precious gift where life isn't the norm but rather DEATH is the final outcome of everything (entropy).
We all have a false sense of security living our daily lives in the normalcy bias and that can be taken away in an instant. Just look at NY/NJ in the aftermath of Sandy - the latest reminder of how deluded we all are. It took just hours for nature to destroy and weeks to get back to normal and some people are still waiting for normal to return. And that's not even a widespread disaster, it's a tiny area while the rest of the world is fine.
Since most people regard science with suspicion because they can't understand it they will just go with whatever sounds better to them. Nevermind that science has given us all the modern day comforts from instant communication to refrigeration and transportation, they don't care as long as they can delude themselves that they are safe and there's a purpose in all the natural "bad" things happening around them as well as some form of continuity after brain death.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by DarkSecret
Bottom line is that we live in a hostile universe where life is a precious gift where life isn't the norm but rather DEATH is the final outcome of everything (entropy).
There is no final outcome, because nothing is ever truly destroyed. Things only change, they don't end completely.
Since most people regard science with suspicion because they can't understand it they will just go with whatever sounds better to them. Nevermind that science has given us all the modern day comforts from instant communication to refrigeration and transportation, they don't care as long as they can delude themselves that they are safe and there's a purpose in all the natural "bad" things happening around them as well as some form of continuity after brain death.
If we were convinced of safety, would all this persecution, war, violence, greed, fear, etc be going on? Those are all the telltale signs of a society that doesn't know who to trust anymore. A society who is so insecure with its own abilities that it will play any trick to land on top.
Quite honestly, a 'new age' looks pretty good right now.
Oh please don't give me the new-agey interpretation of the principle of energy conservation. Of course you can't destroy energy and you can apply E=mc2 to everything. But for someone who is alive how is that helpful when they die?
Sure your atoms were once created inside a super-nova and your atoms will still be around billions of years from now in rocks or other beings but how does that help YOU?
And 120 trillion years from now when the universe is so cold and atoms are so far apart that no interactions are possible how will that make any distinguishable difference from DEATH?
Entropy is just showing us where the arrow of time is pointing and even though everything will still be inside the universe it will be of no use to any kind of organized structure (aka life). So once again, the universe is a hostile place which tends to put everything to death, eventually.
War and violence are just other means of mind control. Hate a minority, de-humanize them and then destroy them. Do that until all your political enemies are gone. I don't see how that's got anything to do with 2012. We all have a false sense of security and we hope that any insecurities are being addressed by the state through police, fire fighters, EMS and military. It doesn't change the fact that most people still feel secure in their homes until a NATURAL disaster hits and reminds them and us all how futile all the politics is because one asteroid could wipe us all out and nobody will ever know that we existed as a species. So once again, the universe is a hostile place which tends to put everything to death, eventually.
Until we drop all brainwashing and accept the cold reality of the hostile universe around us and how small & insignificant we are as a species (without any religious undertones) we will never be truly free.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by DarkSecret
Spoken like a true materialist. Of course you only care about stuff you can touch with your physical hands. That's all that matters, right?
By the way, it's isn't "new agey". Ever heard of Newton? Maybe you should pick up a book on him, you might learn something instead of plugging your ears simply because you don't understand a subject.
Who says death is the end? Who says it isn't a change? People that come back from their death experiences don't say that they were stuck floating in nothingness. In fact, they were still able to perceive after death. And you act like it's the end! No, friend, it's the next great adventure!
And 120 trillion years from now when the universe is so cold and atoms are so far apart that no interactions are possible how will that make any distinguishable difference from DEATH?
You have proof that this will happen? So far, you've done a very poor job of building any kind of case.
Entropy is just showing us where the arrow of time is pointing and even though everything will still be inside the universe it will be of no use to any kind of organized structure (aka life). So once again, the universe is a hostile place which tends to put everything to death, eventually.
And you, as a lowly human being with less than a handful of degrees in any relevant field and dead within a hundred years, would OBVIOUSLY know everything there is to know about the nature of entropy.
Get off your high horse.
Again, you don't understand the universe. The nature of the universe is MOTION. Anything involving motion must eventually change to accommodate the the flow of energy. Change means that things don't stay the same - they may dissolve, they may melt, they may burn, they may crumble to dust and be blown away by the wind. But you know what? The atoms remain, and they become part of something else. They feed something else, breaking down into energy that is used to fuel the processes going on in other parts of the world. It's all a cycle, and if you weren't so focused on what you stand to lose, you would be amazed at everything your energy will become a part of in the distant future.
Actually I had such an NDE experience and I floated up and watched them reanimate me. But at the same time i was still outside when i started breathing and talking to them. It took a few seconds to be back inside behind my eyes. So my conclusion is that we make it all up, it's just like the brain takes a snapshot of the surroundings and then builds a dream around it based on the perceptions that are still alive for a few seconds or minutes before true brain death.
I'm sorry did you just ask me to prove the big bang theory to you? There are libraries full of science books and tons of science channel documentaries about it based on those books.
Yes it's a cycle but that cycle with end due to entropy. The universe's expansion is speeding up and eventually atoms will be too far to interact thus the cycle ends so there will only be a dead dark cold universe.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
That doesn't make you an expert by any means. And that certainly doesn't make everyone else delusional. For all we know, you're still trying to convince yourself because you're afraid of not having any answers.
It's called a 'theory'. Which means there's still gaping holes in it. I'm not satisfied with the Big Bang theory OR Creationism. In fact, the best thing to come out of that theory was a television show. I love that show!
Cool story. Next time, try backing up your bullcrap with some evidence. I might consider you a reliable source. Because as it stands, I can't take you seriously.
Originally posted by MamaJ
I always thought it was a change from the Pisces age to the Aquarius age. I never thought it was supposed to be the end of the world. You take something and tell one person.... remember this game.... then you tell another and by the time it reaches many people it has completely changed.
This is what I have experienced. All of the sudden the Maya's Golden Age of purification is now the "end of the world".
So yeah.... I see it backwards.