It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by herrw
reply to post by klhbrown
Interesting thoughts. I have some problems with them, however. The local news reports featured a video from a helicopter flyover, and there was a definite impact crater (with nothing in it) that showed what appeared to be a shallow-angle crash which stopped just short of a freight train which was derailed.
The helicorder in Bayou Corne registered the blast, which means the shock of it travelled through the ground at least 100 miles. I don't know of an above-ground explosion which would convey that far (or farther) without being attenuated out of existence.
Then again, I'm a crackpot nobody, so my opinions lack any sort of authenticity.
Thus the 7 hour delay...
and per NiteNGale 2
"Apparently, Explo Systems denied an explosion occurring on their property when someone from the sheriff's dept contacted them that night"
And so on...
Originally posted by OneisOne
Originally posted by Stevie777
could there have been two or more explosions..????
According to one news article yesterday, there are two blast sites.
ksla.com
As Hooper notes, the blast site is actually comprised of two blasted areas. The ground is blackened more at one site than the other.
Of course that could just be a story to explain the two flashes that many people stated they saw. (I can see the back room deal now.... people saw 2 flashes?? Let's make 2 blast sites!)edit on 18-10-2012 by OneisOne because: need more coffee!!!
Originally posted by Res Ipsa
Originally posted by taskforce4256
reply to post by Res Ipsa
It doesn't take a million dollar missile to blow up a bunker full of explosives. Someone with moderate technical skills and a pair of bolt-cutters to get in the fence would be all that was needed. This is no longer a federal installation, but state owned or managed property. Like many de-activated bases, it now serves industry, usually the kind you don't want next to your house. Security, if it exists, is about the same as you'd find at a heavy equipment yard.
The whole thing smells to me, but we really know so little...
I myself do not subscribe to the missile theory, you can see that in my previous posts on this thread.
Some people said that they saw a "slower" than meteor speed object coming from the west and moving east and without the typical tail. Those people's eye witness accounts deserve as much credence as that one poster's fathers account of what may be or may not be the same object.
If for example the U.S. were involved in someway with blowing up the Russian munitions dump 6 weeks ago then the bolt cutter theory just isn't going to send the same message as a sub launched missile. The munitions dump wasn't a target for it's value. It was a tit for tat target. But most importantly it was 30 miles from one of our nuke bases, so it had a psychological impact. They are saying, "look, if we wanted to, we could have hit your base and you couldn't have done anything about it." The target was unguarded so no loss of life to escalate the issue.
Does that clear it up for you, and the poster who thinks I believe a missile crawls across the sky or was launched from deep in Siberia.
I don't believe in the missile theory....but I am just saying that if the U.S. had anything to do with the Russian ammunition dump explosion, this would have been an ideal proportionate response.
Originally posted by jaws1975
I think we are all trying to figure this thing out with limited information. What might be helpful is to start eliminating scenario's that just don't seem to fit. I can't imagine the government going to such great lengths to cover up a meteor striking the earth, I'm pretty sure that it happens every now and then. My question is why would a meteor hitting the ground make everyone panic that there is going to be more meteors coming and hitting the ground? If it was a meteor that hit the ground the government would have said so, and that would have been the end of the story. Just my two cents.
Main page /
Last-Modified: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:58:28 GMT
/COMPANY OVERVIEW.htm
Last-Modified: Wed, 27 May 2009 07:43:29 GMT
Originally posted by Trillium
Originally posted by jaws1975
I think we are all trying to figure this thing out with limited information. What might be helpful is to start eliminating scenario's that just don't seem to fit. I can't imagine the government going to such great lengths to cover up a meteor striking the earth, I'm pretty sure that it happens every now and then. My question is why would a meteor hitting the ground make everyone panic that there is going to be more meteors coming and hitting the ground? If it was a meteor that hit the ground the government would have said so, and that would have been the end of the story. Just my two cents.
What if they know their more coming and bigger one I keep telling everybody Nasa or gorvement will not tell you if this is what is happening until the last min.
Only when they can't keep it a secret and even then they will try to.
Originally posted by herrw
Here is a picture which I dug out of their site (the security on their site is laughable) which appears to be the inside view of their 'bunker'. Note that a truck is backed up to a door.
explosystems.com...
Originally posted by hadriana
I just think it is VERY relevant that locals that have been in the area *forever* state that before the explosion, there was more air traffic into that AF base than they had ever, ever seen.