It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
President Obama has the RIGHT via his Executive order to dissolve congress and SUSPEND THE ELECTION all together.
Originally posted by silo13
reply to post by Xcathdra
Thank you for the voice of reason. Though I'm not sure yet if I will agree, lol. And that's not laughing at you.
My point - Homeland Security from back in the Bush era (I thought) gave the acting Potus the power to (in a time or terrorist activity, war etc) 'dissolve congress and suspend the elections'.
I'll look to make sure and post what I find. Either way I appreciate the heads up.
peace
Originally posted by GnosisAD
What's a bank account? Credit? I don't know of these thimgs
Originally posted by Valhall
LMAO!
There's a major problem with your RAMBLING excuse for this being "okie-dokie".
Originally posted by Valhall
You have to first be allegedly DAMAGED by an executive order/law/administrative code before you have standing to argue before the Supreme Court whether it is unconstitutional. The Supreme Court has made clear - time after time - that they have no jurisdiction to preemptively rule on a person claiming FUTURE damage...because the person has no standing.
Originally posted by Valhall
So blather all you want. It's going to be pretty efffing hard to get a good constitutional lawyer if your damned bank account is frozen and you can't even buy a sandwich.
edit on 10-18-2012 by Valhall because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Ghost375
reply to post by mrsdudara
nice analysis of the EO.
Originally posted by Valhall
on anybody even ACCUSED of knowingly or UNKNOWINGLY, directly or INDIRECTLY doing ANYTHING that can be twisted to be of benefit or for ANYONE who has already been labeled a "sanctioned person". Then you're a sanctioned person. No trial, you don't have to know what you did, or who you did it for, or if you even really did it.
(a) knowingly, between July 1, 2010, and August 10, 2012, sold, leased, or provided to Iran goods, services, technology, information, or support with a fair market value of $1,000,000 or more, or with an aggregate fair market value of $5,000,000 or more during a 12-month period, and that could directly and significantly facilitate the maintenance or expansion of Iran's domestic production of refined petroleum products, including any direct and significant assistance with respect to the construction, modernization, or repair of petroleum refineries;
(b) knowingly, between July 1, 2010, and August 10, 2012, sold or provided to Iran refined petroleum products with a fair market value of $1,000,000 or more, or with an aggregate fair market value of $5,000,000 or more during a 12-month period;
(c) knowingly, between July 1, 2010, and August 10, 2012, sold, leased, or provided to Iran goods, services, technology, information, or support with a fair market value of $1,000,000 or more, or with an aggregate fair market value of $5,000,000 or more during a 12-month period, and that could directly and significantly contribute to the enhancement of Iran's ability to import refined petroleum products;
(d) is a successor entity to a person determined by the Secretary of State in accordance with this section to meet the criteria in subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section;
(e) owns or controls a person determined by the Secretary of State in accordance with this section to meet the criteria in subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section, and had knowledge that the person engaged in the activities referred to in that subsection; or
(f) is owned or controlled by, or under common ownership or control with, a person determined by the Secretary of State in accordance with this section to meet the criteria in subsection (a), (b), or (c) of this section, and knowingly participated in the activities referred to in that subsection.