It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
There was no such thing as a Christian or the Church yet when Christ was speaking in Matthew 24.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
And by 2nd advent, it means second coming to Earth.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
The nation of Israel and Jerusalem are not yet redeemed to Christ, and we certainly are not in a period of time of everlasting righteousness, so no.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
So as you can see Messiah was cut off (crucified) in the 62th week. The 70th week cannot have been when his ministry began.
Originally posted by 1PLA1
reply to post by SimonPeter
One cannot be on the earth and not suffer when God's wrath is poured out on the earth and all humans who are on earth.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by truejew
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
Is it finished or not?
"24Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy." (Daniel 9:24-25 KJV)
"30When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost." (John 19:30-31 KJV)
"Upon thy people and the Holy city".
The nation of Israel and Jerusalem are not yet redeemed to Christ, and we certainly are not in a period of time of everlasting righteousness, so no. Hosea 5:15 triggers His return, they must confess their offense, (singular and specific/rejection of Him as the Moshiyach Nagid), and in their affliction (the time of Jacob's trouble) they will seek Him earnestly. That's the point of the great tribulation. And Christ's "it is finished" quote was talking about His atonement for sin, not the redemption of "thy people and the Holy city". If He was referring to that He failed, Jews aren't Christians yet, Jerusalem is still in denial of their Messiah and King.
edit on 20-9-2012 by NOTurTypical because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by truejew
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
So as you can see Messiah was cut off (crucified) in the 62th week. The 70th week cannot have been when his ministry began.
In addition to my previous post to you...
Your counting is off. Daniel says there is 7 weeks, then 62 weeks. That is a total of 69 weeks. Messieh is cut off after the 62 week period (after 69 weeks), meaning within the 70th week.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
Originally posted by truejew
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
So as you can see Messiah was cut off (crucified) in the 62th week. The 70th week cannot have been when his ministry began.
In addition to my previous post to you...
Your counting is off. Daniel says there is 7 weeks, then 62 weeks. That is a total of 69 weeks. Messieh is cut off after the 62 week period (after 69 weeks), meaning within the 70th week.
Even if i was off he was still cut off in the 69th week, his ministry still could not have begun in the 70th week. I was thinking the 7 weeks came after the 62, but again, his ministry could not have begun in the 70th week he had already been crucified. Unless ofcourse you're reckoning him as being the Holy Spirit himself, then his ministry would have been going on for the last 2000 years but that doesn't fit the eschatological timeline.
Originally posted by 1PLA1
reply to post by truejew
True, God can protect whom He chooses. I do not limit my Creator. I put my trust in His Word and His words.
Jewish people who have not accepted Jesus as their personal savior are not a part of His Church. Thus, the statement that jews are the church is untrue.
Originally posted by 1PLA1
reply to post by truejew
True, God can protect whom He chooses. I do not limit my Creator. I put my trust in His Word and His words.
Jewish people who have not accepted Jesus as their personal savior are not a part of His Church. Thus, the statement that jews are the church is untrue.
Where do you find the word "redemption" that you insert into your philosophy which negates the redemptive power of Christ?
And Christ's "it is finished" quote was talking about His atonement for sin, not the redemption of "thy people and the Holy city".
So how does that make any difference?
There was no such thing as a Christian or the Church yet when Christ was speaking in Matthew 24.
Those two statements of yours seem to contradict each other. If a covenant was instituted, then the "birth" of the church would have already happened, where the thing it is compared to was the sprinkling of the blood on the twelve stones at the foot of Mt. Sinai, where the Church (congregation) under Moses was already assembled to enter the covenant, having been born out of the Red Sea.
The church was "born" at Pentecost, the new covenant in His blood was instituted at the last supper, and believers were first called Christians at Antioch, Syria.
As a philosophy, maybe, as a teaching of the Bible, no.
And by 2nd advent, it means second coming to Earth.
More philosophy created independent of the Bible.
To walk, talk, be seen by all, just as He was when He incarnated as a man. In the rapture verses He comes, never sets foot on the Earth, gathers His bride and returns to heaven for the marriage supper and the Judgment Seat of Christ.
Something never described in the Bible.
At the rapture only His own will see and hear Him.
More fabrications that are not taught in the Bible.
At His second advent He comes with His bride in glory, sets foot on Earth, everyone will see Him sinner and saint alike, and He comes to establish the Davidic Covenant. The two are completely different.
It does not say the great tribulation, but a testing, where they had already shown the ability to resist temptation.
In the letters to the 7 churches the overcomer is promised to be spared/removed from the great tribulation.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by abeverage
Since most "Christians" have done nothing to stop wars, famine and general grief of the rest of humanity. They have also taken horrible care of their "Fathers" house with little or no regard for the eventual return. Doing things like supporting the strip mining whole sale rape and reaping of the earth, it’s resources and life!
Jesus never tasked us with stopping wars, that is not what he made us for. What is it with all you people who think this responsibility falls on us?
What did my brothers and sisters do in the face of Nero's wrath? They did not fight back, they stood their ground in their faith and they died martyrs deaths and they loved not their lives even to death, being burned to death on a stake as his "Roman candles", thrown to gladiators and lions in the Coliseum and arenas. What does taking a life accomplish? Nothing but blood on your own hands, and then you become the very thing you hated the most.
The night is coming and believing only that saving their brothers was the only good work have not understood and will suffer the same fate as the rest. I am not saying they would be denied heaven but there will be a price to be paid for not being good stewards of his house and not heeding those words
Foolish to believe you will be whisked away while others suffer the same suffering they have allowed for so long and done nothing to prevent! No rapture until they face the master of the house and admit they were misled and did wrong
Originally posted by 1PLA1
reply to post by SimonPeter
Are they the Church or are they those martyred during the tribulation?
Whoever they are they definitly went through the great tribulation.