It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
John Darby and Ms. MacDonald popularized the teaching, they didn't invent it.
Darby made it into a doctrine, then built an entire theology around it, then actively promoted it with big money backing, most likely rich Zionists who saw the theories as supporting their planned future take-over of Jerusalem.
The traditional Christian view of Daniel 9 is to see the "prince" in the vision as the Messiah, otherwise known to his followers as Jesus.
I'd check Daniel 9 again.
You are effectively denying that the Daniel prophecy was about Jesus, and are giving it to the antichrist beast.
The events of the 70th week have not happened.
The traditional Christian view is that the writer of Revelation was the John who was one of Jesus' twelve disciples, where your dating, to make it written after the fall of Jerusalem, and in the time of Domitian, negates that and throws it open to speculation who wrote it and if it is authoritative, being then an anonymous writing (according to your heretical theory).
John writes about that coming week in Revelation, penned in 95 AD.
He was transported to the Day of the Lord and told to write everything he saw, heard, and felt.
That would be step #4, after things like seeing the context within the text itself, and seeing what the literal meanings of the words within it are.
Okay, lets try some contextual theology. The first rule of Biblical hermeneutics is to always account for historical and cultural context. Rule #1.
OK, you brought this up, so how is that relevant?
Who was Christ addressing in Matthew 24? Jews or Christians?
You say below that there was no concept of a rapture, so you narrow down the possible meanings of this verse right there. I would say there probably was an idea of a rapture in Jesus' day, the unknown thing would have been the concept of a rapture independent of a hypothetical "end of the world" scenario.
And is that verse talking about the rapture or the 2nd advent of Christ. Is Christ coming to Earth in that passage or just the heavens, and will all people see the event or just His own?
So who was it that "solved" this mystery?
. . . The mystery of the rapture wasn't even revealed yet at the time Christ was speaking in Matthew 24.
He will be on His way to Earth when His own will see Him and be caught up to meet Him in the air. Then the Church will turn around and come the rest of the way back with Christ.
All this can be written off as a sort of description of the change from one eon to another, and as Matthew's expansion of the Markan parallel verses which describe the creation of the new congregation of God, otherwise known as, the church of Jesus.
"29Immediately after the tribulation of those days shall the sun be darkened, and the moon shall not give her light, and the stars shall fall from heaven, and the powers of the heavens shall be shaken: 30And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory." (Matthew 24:29-30 KJV)
"Immediately after the tribulation of those days" does not take place before the tribulation of those days.
At the rapture He comes FOR His bride, the church/Ekklesia. At the rapture only His own will see Him. At he 2nd Advent He comes WITH His bride, the entire world will see Him return in glory.
You are skipping something, too. Like the verse that explains where the people come from, in 6:11,
Minor problem here. You left off verses 27 and 28.
. . . . . . . . . .
The tribulation being talked about here is the tribulation of the days of the carcass. Not the great tribulation. This is a separate event.
Also consider the description of the 6th seal of Revelation.
. . . . . . . . . .
Where did all the people come from? They have to be the raptured. Also these people were not present at the start of the prophesy. Revelation 4-6 describes a sea of glass surrounding the throne of God and where the seal are being opened. If there was a multitude of people there at the time why are they not mentioned?
I would have to say the rapture is part of the events of the 6th seal of Revelation.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
2. No, in Matthew 24 Christ is addressing Jews, that's the "cultural context" of that chapter.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
3. The 2nd advent and the rapture are not the same thing. During the rapture He comes in the air and takes His bride for the marriage supper. At the rapture He comes FOR His bride, the church/Ekklesia. At the rapture only His own will see Him. At he 2nd Advent He comes WITH His bride, the entire world will see Him return in glory.
Originally posted by truejew
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by dwarfflex
Whats your thoughts on the rapture , before during or after the great tribulation ?
Before. And even before Daniel's 70th week begins. You do realize the period of time labeled "great tribulation" is just the last 3 1/2 years of Daniel's 70th week. In John's vision of the Day of the Lord the church is present in heaven when Christ is handed the 7 sealed scroll and begins to loose it's seals starting Daniel's 70th week.
Daniel's 70th week has already happened. It began with the start of the ministry of Jesus.
Since most "Christians" have done nothing to stop wars, famine and general grief of the rest of humanity. They have also taken horrible care of their "Fathers" house with little or no regard for the eventual return. Doing things like supporting the strip mining whole sale rape and reaping of the earth, it’s resources and life!
Originally posted by truejew
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
2. No, in Matthew 24 Christ is addressing Jews, that's the "cultural context" of that chapter.
Jesus was addressing Christian Jews. Therefore He was addressing both.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
3. The 2nd advent and the rapture are not the same thing. During the rapture He comes in the air and takes His bride for the marriage supper. At the rapture He comes FOR His bride, the church/Ekklesia. At the rapture only His own will see Him. At he 2nd Advent He comes WITH His bride, the entire world will see Him return in glory.
They are the same. Jesus comes twice, not three times.
Originally posted by truejew
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
Is it finished or not?
"24Seventy weeks are determined upon thy people and upon thy holy city, to finish the transgression, and to make an end of sins, and to make reconciliation for iniquity, and to bring in everlasting righteousness, and to seal up the vision and prophecy, and to anoint the most Holy." (Daniel 9:24-25 KJV)
"30When Jesus therefore had received the vinegar, he said, It is finished: and he bowed his head, and gave up the ghost." (John 19:30-31 KJV)