It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Lesbian Widow Sues Over Estate Tax JONAH COMSTOCK - 10 November 2010. BY An 81-year-old gay woman whose partner of 44 years died last year sued the federal government today over the Defense of Marriage Act, which she called discriminatory and therefore unconstitutional. Edith Windsor is suing over a $350,000 federal estate tax that was levied against her, even though under federal law a spouse is exempt from paying estate taxes – the so-called “widow’s exemption.” cityherald.org...
Originally posted by aardvark888
The gay lifestyle is unnatural, unhealthy, perverse and immoral. Why are we even having this debate.
Originally posted by aardvark888
The gay lifestyle is unnatural, unhealthy, perverse and immoral. Why are we even having this debate.
Originally posted by Labrynth2012
The GLT community does not follow or believe in Christian or biblical life, rules and Laws of God.
If the did, they would not be doing whatever it is they are in defiance of God's will.
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by whyamIhere
Watch me avoid your point completely.
Second Circuit rejects BLAG’s motion to suspend oral arguments in Windsor v. USA
August 23, 2012 - Jacob Combs
In a one sentence order released today, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals denied a request by the Bipartisan Legal Advisory Group (BLAG) to suspend oral arguments at the appellate court in the DOMA case Windsor v. USA that are currently scheduled to take place in New York on September 27.
Edie Windsor, a New York widow forced by DOMA to pay over $360,000 in estate taxes following the death of her wife, won a district court ruling striking down DOMA and ordering her taxes be repaid. Windsor had appealed the case to the Second Circuit and requested an expedited appeal schedule, but she also filed a petition for certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking to have the case heard there before it is taken up by the Second Circuit. BLAG asked the appeals court to put the case on hold pending a Supreme Court decision on the Windsor petition; the Ninth Circuit recently vacated arguments in another DOMA case, Golinski v. OPM, that had been appealed directly to the Supreme Court. www.prop8trialtracker.com...
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by whyamIhere
Watch me avoid your point completely.
She must have had an estate of $6,000,000 or more. The IRS exempts the first $5 million from estate taxes. If you're getting older with an estate that size and haven't done any estate planning, then you're being careless. And from the article, she knew about the problems of not being married in the US, another reason to plan ahead.
To your point, though. One of the worst words in the political and economic vocabulary is "fair." Nobody knows what it means precisely, but it trumps all existing laws and rules. If someone breaks a law, the cry is (sometimes) "But the law isn't fair."
Maybe I've spent too much time in threads discussing this issue. But if you want to say a law is "unconstitutional," fine, file your court documents and let's see. Calling something "fair" is about the worst reason for supporting a law that I know of.
Again, forgive me for exploding like this. I try to keep my cool. I think I'll go have a drink.
Originally posted by Labrynth2012
Originally posted by aardvark888
The gay lifestyle is unnatural, unhealthy, perverse and immoral. Why are we even having this debate.
Because the GLT community is upset that they don't get to have the same PRIVILEGES that are given to Heterosexual couples. It is a "legal status" that they are upset about getting that they do not have.
The GLT community does not follow or believe in Christian or biblical life, rules and Laws of God.
If the did, they would not be doing whatever it is they are in defiance of God's will.
You're absolutely right, I agree completely. That's why I said at the beginning of my post that I was avoiding the point. It's certainly true. But, by itself, it kind of ends the discussion. It's like noting that the water is wet.
The point is - - if her marriage was recognized Federally - - she would not have to pay. THAT WAS THE POINT.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by aardvark888
The gay lifestyle is unnatural, unhealthy, perverse and immoral. Why are we even having this debate.
It's an orientation - - - birth right - - - how the body is wired. Basically - - how God made them.
Who the hell are you or your personal belief system - - to dictate what is moral?
Its your belief - nothing more.
Lifestyle - - is how someone lives their life. What career they have - what car they drive - what movies they like - etc etc etc.
Originally posted by aardvark888
The gay lifestyle is unnatural, unhealthy, perverse and immoral. Why are we even having this debate.
Originally posted by aardvark888
The gay lifestyle is unnatural, unhealthy, perverse and immoral. Why are we even having this debate.
Originally posted by GreatOwl
That's just an opinion. God didn't say he made them this way, either. At least the Judeo-Christian-Muslim God is very clear on how he made man, what sexual orientation he designed into man, he says it right in the book of Genesis
Originally posted by charles1952
Leaving aside questions of orientation, anybody with that much money could have avoided the estate tax with very little work. Apparently, she didn't do any work. It's not surprising that she got hit with a tax.
Originally posted by Annee
[
Sexual orientation is not a choice.
Originally posted by GreatOwl
Originally posted by Annee
[
Sexual orientation is not a choice.
Sorry, but that's just your belief. You state it as if it is a proven fact. But, it's all opinion, and repeated opinion.
But, actually, some same-sex birds do do it. So do beetles, sheep, fruit bats, dolphins, and orangutans. Zoologists are discovering that homosexual and bisexual activity is not unknown within the animal kingdom.