It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
So why haven't you built one?
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
I strongly believe a closed loop magnetic engine that feeds back into itself can be built. This engine can be made to do heavy physical work or produce enough electricity to power common everyday things with no external power source.
If you read my posts explaining the problems you will see I also said these are simple enough devices to build yourself, and I encourage you to build it yourself. I neither expect nor want you to take my word at face value...go ahead and try it, and report the results back to us here.
Yes I did play with that and I liked it. However I'm not sure how accurate it is as a simulator. The version I played with had a few little bugs but it was still fun.
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
Ever played with a popular video game series called The Incredible Machine? If I had a program that simulated all these components, I could make one in theory at least in a computer simulation.
Originally posted by roguetechie
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
If you are only putting half of your energy back into electromagnets then you will constantly be halving the possible output.
...If I had a program that simulated all these components, I could...
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
Perpetual motion is possible in some cases, like a planet with no atmosphere or tidal forces spinning in space can spin pretty much forever without slowing down.
As soon as you try to extract any energy from the spinning motion, it will slow down.
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
So 1) we have established this technically IS a perpetual motion machine. Bravo. that ought to shut the naysayers up.
But 2) many of you are still thinking in the old physical universe where you need torque or power or strength to - move something else through space to do " WORK ". This is childish. Haven't we passed these silly lessons for babies of Newton and his so called physical laws yet?
Think out of the box. It only takes a spark to get a fire going. That's what this thing does. It makes a spark. We don't NEED it to actually do any physical "work". All we need is to take that spark, and use it to feed something else that can produce a bigger spark and so on until we get a roaring fire. It really is that simple.
So he can light LED's.
Originally posted by The Cusp
In the earlier versions depicted in that video, he is essentially pushing the wheel with his hand. The force to turn the wheel is not coming from the magnets, but from the muscle power in his arm.
In his final build, he's relying on gravity to do the pushing, and I just don't think gravity is strong enough in this case to get the job done. The force of the falling magnet would not push the wheel, but balance it's self out.
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
Originally posted by The Cusp
In the earlier versions depicted in that video, he is essentially pushing the wheel with his hand. The force to turn the wheel is not coming from the magnets, but from the muscle power in his arm.
In his final build, he's relying on gravity to do the pushing, and I just don't think gravity is strong enough in this case to get the job done. The force of the falling magnet would not push the wheel, but balance it's self out.
Thats not how I'm seeing it work. In the final build the force to turn the wheel is indeed coming from the magnets.. say, 3/4 of a turn - But then he has to move his "pusher magnet" out of the way so so the fields don't cancel each other out,
I maintain it can be done if you forget this thing doing physical work and use it for electrical work instead to feed something else ( as seen in the second video down the page)
Originally posted by renegadeloser
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
He modifies the device, so that it does the work of raising the bar itself, and still has enough power to spin.
Hopefully it's not a problem that I agreed with you, is it? Why do I need to re-read your post?
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Maybe you should reread my post. That is exactly what I said.
Originally posted by dashen
reply to post by boncho
Neither is the machine in the featured video, but the 1000 or so years it would take the magnet to lose its charge puts your initial comment in perspective.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
Originally posted by JohnPhoenix
Originally posted by The Cusp
In the earlier versions depicted in that video, he is essentially pushing the wheel with his hand. The force to turn the wheel is not coming from the magnets, but from the muscle power in his arm.
In his final build, he's relying on gravity to do the pushing, and I just don't think gravity is strong enough in this case to get the job done. The force of the falling magnet would not push the wheel, but balance it's self out.
Thats not how I'm seeing it work. In the final build the force to turn the wheel is indeed coming from the magnets.. say, 3/4 of a turn - But then he has to move his "pusher magnet" out of the way so so the fields don't cancel each other out,
Where does the energy come from to move the pusher magnet? That is energy being introduced into the system. This alone prevents it from being a perpetual motion system.
I maintain it can be done if you forget this thing doing physical work and use it for electrical work instead to feed something else ( as seen in the second video down the page)
You display you lack any sort of understanding as to what work is. Electrical work is work, it is impossible, even if this was a perpetual motion device (which it is not as I already proved) it could not do any electrical work or the system would stop.