It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
These douchebags are so desperate, they will take any measures to regulate gun laws. Desperate I say! tsk tsk. Expect more i say...Unbelievable!
Must be desperate! Please tell us how having a shooting in NYC, a city with strict gun laws, will strengthen the cause for banning guns?
Originally posted by Kandinsky
1 killer dead and 9 bystanders injured in broad daylight on a crowded street?
Those cops did a good job imo.
Of course, they could have stood still shouting 'Freeze' and run the chance of the gunman emptying his clips into the crowd...
Then we'd be reading a different thread about how bad police are instead of reading this thread about how bad police are. I wonder what scenario would help those police escape a thread about bad they were? If they'd disarmed the man maybe we could have run up a thread that they put people's lives at risk?
Originally posted by deadeyedick
This must be some new tactic.
Wound all bystanders so the shooter will have no one to target.
I bet the shooter stood there stunned in awe thinking who's side are you on right before he was taken down.
Civilian "you shot me officer"
Officer "no i saved your life"
Originally posted by Maroboduus
Originally posted by Kandinsky
1 killer dead and 9 bystanders injured in broad daylight on a crowded street?
Those cops did a good job imo.
Of course, they could have stood still shouting 'Freeze' and run the chance of the gunman emptying his clips into the crowd...
Then we'd be reading a different thread about how bad police are instead of reading this thread about how bad police are. I wonder what scenario would help those police escape a thread about bad they were? If they'd disarmed the man maybe we could have run up a thread that they put people's lives at risk?
Are you being facetious? They were no more than 5 feet away from the guy. Why in god's name would you need to fire 9 shots at somebody who is a few feet away? Aren't these highly trained police officers? Shouldn't they be able to take down a perpetrator standing directly in front of them without firing a total of 16 shots? If not, then they shouldn't be police officers or the police need to rethink their training methods. One shot should have been enough. They shot SIXTEEN TIMES!.
Shooting 9 people in order to stop somebody who shot one person, and you think they did a good job.....
Originally posted by SGTSECRET
Police shoot and wound 9 people...it's ok.
If a crazy gunman shot 9 people...national news for at least a week full of anti gun b.s.
Originally posted by Yeats
Originally posted by Maroboduus
Originally posted by Kandinsky
1 killer dead and 9 bystanders injured in broad daylight on a crowded street?
Those cops did a good job imo.
Of course, they could have stood still shouting 'Freeze' and run the chance of the gunman emptying his clips into the crowd...
Then we'd be reading a different thread about how bad police are instead of reading this thread about how bad police are. I wonder what scenario would help those police escape a thread about bad they were? If they'd disarmed the man maybe we could have run up a thread that they put people's lives at risk?
Are you being facetious? They were no more than 5 feet away from the guy. Why in god's name would you need to fire 9 shots at somebody who is a few feet away? Aren't these highly trained police officers? Shouldn't they be able to take down a perpetrator standing directly in front of them without firing a total of 16 shots? If not, then they shouldn't be police officers or the police need to rethink their training methods. One shot should have been enough. They shot SIXTEEN TIMES!.
Shooting 9 people in order to stop somebody who shot one person, and you think they did a good job.....
When was the last time you fired a gun at some one? When was the last time you fired a gun at some on under massive amounts of stress? Have you ever thought about killing some one to protect the many?
Originally posted by Yeats
Originally posted by SGTSECRET
Police shoot and wound 9 people...it's ok.
If a crazy gunman shot 9 people...national news for at least a week full of anti gun b.s.
Completely out of context.
I can play that game as well:
Police remove one hostile individual that had plans on killing a theater full of innocent people.
Unfathomably they also wounded 9 people in the process.
The gun man was subdued and will face trial, the injured will fully recover.
Originally posted by zayonara
Wow. Imagine if nobody in the city had guns, other than the criminals. Ban a gun, but you better also ban crime. A driven criminal will break a law, or a ban, to get a gun.
Try not to assume that the police missed their target nine times. Bullets bounce and create shrapnel. NYC is crowded. Let's use facts.
Nine bystanders were wounded in the 16-shot volley, all by stray or ricocheting police bullets. None of their injuries was life-threatening, police said. Read more: www.foxnews.com...
Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
But, I thought having more guns at a scene of a shooting would keep people safe???
These are trained police officers...and even they can't control their gunfire in broad daylight. Can you imagine if 5-10 people were armed in Aurora inside a smokey dark movie theater???
Some people want you to believe that if other people were armed, they would have taken down the shooter with one clean shot and been the hero...I think this pretty much proves them wrong.
Originally posted by Yeats
Originally posted by SGTSECRET
Police shoot and wound 9 people...it's ok.
If a crazy gunman shot 9 people...national news for at least a week full of anti gun b.s.
Completely out of context.
I can play that game as well:
Police remove one hostile individual that had plans on killing a theater full of innocent people.
Unfathomably they also wounded 9 people in the process.
The gun man was subdued and will face trial, the injured will fully recover.
Originally posted by RomeByFire
You make a solid point and I've never thought of it from that angle but definitely understand where you're coming from, but that's a huge variable to throw into play on its own. Just because more people have guns doesn't mean they are all going to be inaccurate and cause more damage, there's nothing to substantiate that claim.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
It occurs to me that if the Police are willing to admit this screw up so quickly - what are they trying to hide????
New York (CNN) -- A disgruntled former apparel designer was killed Friday morning in a hail of police gunfire in front of the Empire State Building after he shot and killed a co-worker and engaged in a gunbattle with two officers, authorities said.
Police officers fired a total of 16 rounds; one officer shot nine while another one shot seven, the New York Police Department said. He reiterated that the officers appeared to have no choice but to shoot Johnson, whose body had 10 bullets wounds in the chest, arms and legs.