It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
There is plenty in the bible that clearly show that Jesus was NOT God.
I can do nothing on my own. I judge as God tells me. Therefore, my judgment is just, because I carry out the will of the one who sent me, not my own will.
-John 5:30
Here is a breakdown of the verse...
I can do nothing on my own = Jesus was an ordinary human being.
I judge as God tells me = Jesus was taking orders from a separate entity.
I carry out the will of the one who sent me, = Jesus was 'sent' , and therefore cannot be the same as the one who sent him.
not my own will. = Jesus placed Gods will above his own.
So, how can you possibly think Jesus does as God tells him and YET be God?
Jesus is stating that as God, come in the flesh, all He did was in accord with the Father.
That even though he was a free/independent agent of God and was God as part of the unity of the trinity that his will was never in opposition to Gods or his own.
Here are some OT and NT passages to support the Idea that only God can Judge.
Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
reply to post by NihilistSanta
Here are some OT and NT passages to support the Idea that only God can Judge.
Yes, and Jesus says he judges as God tells him to.
So it is God who is making the real judgement and Jesus is simply carrying out orders.
Its like a court judge giving authority to a subordinate to carry out judgement.
The subordinate is simply following orders... but the real power lies with the judge.
Will you say that the subordinate is part of the judge, or that the subordinate is himself a judge because of the power given to him by a higher authority?
Yes but his judgement is Gods because He is God. God has referred to himself in the plural before like in Genesis 1:26 so it would be natural for him to talk to God and for God to tell him things.
. . . for nonbiblical scholars who have never bothered to read the Holy Bible, this is a way to allow those who do not understand who Yeshua is . . .
The theme of the bible tells us that Jesus is the son of Yahweh.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
. . . for nonbiblical scholars who have never bothered to read the Holy Bible, this is a way to allow those who do not understand who Yeshua is . . .
Problem with this statement is there is no way to find out about a person by that name in the Bible since you cannot find it there.
The Bible talks about someone named Jesus, and it also says those who do not believe in that name cannot be saved.
So, right from the get-go, you are leading people off a cliff, straight into Hell.edit on 26-7-2012 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
Who is Jesus? Son of God or God
John 1:1 ... In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
Yes, and Jesus says he judges as God tells him to.
So it is God who is making the real judgement and Jesus is simply carrying out orders.
Its like a court judge giving authority to a subordinate to carry out judgement.
The subordinate is simply following orders... but the real power lies with the judge.
Will you say that the subordinate is part of the judge, or that the subordinate is himself a judge because of the power given to him by a higher authority?
Originally posted by chadderson
Some people are born with the ability to be enormously muscular. Some people are born with genes that keep them thin for their entire lives. Some people are born with yada yada yada... Jesus was an anomaly, a savant, a 1 in a bajillion occurance.. but he was not god. He was simply born with a gift that others do not possess. It is not impossible for others to posses it, but only he had what he had, and to this day nobody has been able to replicate that inherent connection that he did.
He shared his knowledge through is actions and following his heart, aka the truth, and his reason for living was to touch the lives of others so they may also find peace of mind and assurance of a god themselves. Can others also feel that they may be here to help others? I can say i am happy with my life, to the point of not being 'needy', but to do what jesus did and die for what he believed in, that is another story and that takes next to pure courage and heart to pull off.
EDIT: But i think that is the age we are entering as humanity. The ability to follow our hearts and our beliefs that flow out of love itself, and would be willing to die before we picked up a gun and killed someone that is unable to see the truth themselves. It is within the capacity to forgive others for not being able to see truth... after all we are living in a society that is manipulated by people who want to control, control, control.edit on 25-7-2012 by chadderson because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Lazarus Short
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
. . . for nonbiblical scholars who have never bothered to read the Holy Bible, this is a way to allow those who do not understand who Yeshua is . . .
Problem with this statement is there is no way to find out about a person by that name in the Bible since you cannot find it there.
The Bible talks about someone named Jesus, and it also says those who do not believe in that name cannot be saved.
So, right from the get-go, you are leading people off a cliff, straight into Hell.edit on 26-7-2012 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
"That name." It's always a problem, that Jesus. Yes, I find "Jesus" in my Bibles too, but let's think outside the box. In Jesus' own time, do you suppose His name was pronounced as we pronounce it today? Is our salvation based on correct pronunciation? Correct spelling? Do we use the Hebrew, Greek, or English spelling? For that matter, the letter "J" is a fairly late development in the history of the alphabet, so that every "J" word in your or my Bible once began with an "I." Happily, salvation is by the blood of Yeshua, Iesous, or Jesus, and not based on linguistic orthodoxy. If we're going to Hell [Are you meaning the Grave or the fictional Hell of Dante?] over word or name usage, we're all in a LOT of trouble.edit on 26-7-2012 by Lazarus Short because: lah-de-dah
Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
Jesus also said he was doing Gods will and not his own... and that he cant do anything on his own, thereby establishing that God, the One who sent him was higher.
Originally posted by mileysubet
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by mileysubet
You would think that a "god" with omnipresent powers would be able to stop by for a chat every once and and a while right?
I would think that someone who thought it all to be "fairy tales" would find better uses for their time then trolling forum threads
If my opinion is considered "trolling" then so be it. No skin off my back, but what ever man, keep on keeping on.
But here in reality, why would a omnipresent god not be able to "speak" directly to its "subjects", does this not raise a red flag to you? 2000 years and no one has seen this so called god? why would it do that? to what purpose?
It really makes no sense what so ever.edit on 25-7-2012 by mileysubet because: (no reason given)