It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by queenofangels_17
reply to post by stupid girl
2:256 There is no compulsion in religion. The right direction is henceforth distinct from error. And he who rejecteth false deities and believeth in Allah hath grasped a firm handhold which will never break. Allah is Hearer, Knower.
Peace!
'The Book Pertaining to the Turmoil and Portents of the Last Hour (Kitab Al-Fitan wa Ashrat As-Sa`ah)' of Sahih Muslim.
6981
Ibn 'Umar reported Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: You will fight against the Jews and you will kill them until even a stone would say: Come here, Muslim, there is a Jew (hiding himself behind me) ; kill him.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
Every detail of the Passover foreshadowed Christ and His ultimate sacrifice.
Originally posted by deadeyedick
These words spoken from the cross are certainly perplexing. How could Jesus be God and yet be forsaken by God? Martin Luther said it best "God forsaking God who can understand that?” I don’t know for certain, but here are a few thoughts that I have on this passage.
www.biblecenter.com... ossmygodwhyhaveyouforsakenme.htm
My thoughts on this subject mirror that of Martin Luther as stated above.
I will not deny the father,son, and definitely not the holy spirit because i believe that would lead me down a forsaken road to a wide gate.
In a vague sort of way, but that was not what you said earlier, that they were prophecies.
Genesis 22 and Exodus 12 were foreshadows of Christ being crucified.
I would say, no, they are not "mirroring" but went on divergent courses from the time of Christ.
Christianity is mirroring judaism.
More like they served as convenient backdrops for Jesus to act out to make certain points.
The jewish feastdays were dress rehearsals to be fulfilled by Christ.
These are not "prophecies" to be "fulfilled". The corresponding concepts built into those celebrations have already been utilized.
Passover and Shavuot (Pentecost) were already fulfilled by him, theres 3 left to go. Rosh Hoshana, Yom Kippur and Sukkot which are still to come and occur in the tribulation period.
You may believe that happened, probably from Acts, which I do not take as actual history but more a parable that made use of things already known, making nice little connections like that for the "wow" factor.
Just as the Israelites Shavuot occured 50 days after Passover, so to did Pentecost occur 50 days after Christ's crucifiction.
It isn't. The stories in the Gospels may, but that has nothing to do with the church. If Judaism was somehow "ok", then there would have been no reason for the church.
So you really didn't know christinianity is linked to judaism and the Feast days of Yahweh?
Huh? No, we did not go through the Red Sea, but were baptized. They aren't the "same thing". One has a fuzzy sort of correspondence with a few aspects of the other.
Everything that happened to their church happened to ours right down to the apostacies.
No, that doesn't even make sense and why would you want any of that stuff to be true anyway?
The jewish church when Christ began his ministry was stuck in the Laodician church age, and we're there right now. We're mirroring them step by step.
Riddle me this, if jews and christians have the same God as muslim do, why do muslim kill christians and jews? If Allah is the same as Yahweh why murder people who have the same God hm? Why does the Quran say:
The Last Supper was not a Seder, remember Jesus was executed before Passover.
The Seder meal where the Israelites (in Exodus 12) would eat the flesh of the lamb with bitter herbs and drink wine was a direct foreshadowing of the Last Supper where Jesus broke the bread and said "this is my body which has been broken for you, take and eat", the disciples were eating the "body of the lamb" as it were, the Bread of Life.
Where does it say Yahweh is the "name above all names"?
In Isaiah Yahweh is the Savior, the name above all names
In a lot of the manuscripts, it leaves off the article, so it says "name above all names" which is more a position as Lord rather than an actual proper name.
In Philipians 2 Jesus holds the name above all names, the Savior.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
The Last Supper was not a Seder, remember Jesus was executed before Passover.
The Seder meal where the Israelites (in Exodus 12) would eat the flesh of the lamb with bitter herbs and drink wine was a direct foreshadowing of the Last Supper where Jesus broke the bread and said "this is my body which has been broken for you, take and eat", the disciples were eating the "body of the lamb" as it were, the Bread of Life.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by queenofangels_17
Religion shows how to worship God, it unites man's social life with his worship of the Almighty God.
Let's focus right there. You're right, it shows how to worship. Thing is, spirituality is not specifically worship. Spirituality is a connection. Religion teaches us to find it outside of us, spirituality teaches us that it's actually INSIDE of us.
Finding an outside invisible bearded man in the sky makes it easier to worship, that's all.
Originally posted by queenofangels_17
Jesus said, "If the flesh came into being because of spirit, it is a wonder. But if spirit came into being because of the body, it is a wonder of wonders. Indeed, I am amazed at how this great wealth has made its home in this poverty."
I hope you find the interpreation of this saying.
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by queenofangels_17
Jesus said, "If the flesh came into being because of spirit, it is a wonder. But if spirit came into being because of the body, it is a wonder of wonders. Indeed, I am amazed at how this great wealth has made its home in this poverty."
I hope you find the interpreation of this saying.
Why do you think quoting the Gnostic and non-canonical Gospel of Thomas is going to make headway with Christians? That passage is classic Gnostic dualism, the perfection of the spiritual and the evil nature of the material. Christ would never have said that.
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by queenofangels_17
Jesus said, "If the flesh came into being because of spirit, it is a wonder. But if spirit came into being because of the body, it is a wonder of wonders. Indeed, I am amazed at how this great wealth has made its home in this poverty."
I hope you find the interpreation of this saying.
Why do you think quoting the Gnostic and non-canonical Gospel of Thomas is going to make headway with Christians? That passage is classic Gnostic dualism, the perfection of the spiritual and the evil nature of the material. Christ would never have said that.
Originally posted by queenofangels_17
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by queenofangels_17
Jesus said, "If the flesh came into being because of spirit, it is a wonder. But if spirit came into being because of the body, it is a wonder of wonders. Indeed, I am amazed at how this great wealth has made its home in this poverty."
I hope you find the interpreation of this saying.
Why do you think quoting the Gnostic and non-canonical Gospel of Thomas is going to make headway with Christians? That passage is classic Gnostic dualism, the perfection of the spiritual and the evil nature of the material. Christ would never have said that.
That is exactly what he said... Jesus spoke in parables, but those with heavy hearts will never understand them until you spell it out to them.
If you believe only canonical gospels which Jesus never spoke, then you will never know nor will you have any idea of what the real Jesus said.
When you find the interpretation, maybe you will have an idea.
If the flesh came into being because of spirit, it is a wonder.
But if spirit came into being because of the body, it is a wonder of wonders.
Indeed, I am amazed at how this great wealth has made its home in this poverty.