It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ACTS 2:38
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
Jesus is God in the flesh.
God whose name is Jesus had to fulfill the prophecy of the old testament.
It is hard for man to wrap the concept up in their finite minds, but you are three in one
you are a son or a daughter, you could be a mother or a father, you are a person.
all three can be used to describe you and yet you have a name that identifies just you.
John 5:37-47
37 And the Father who sent me has himself testified concerning me. You have never heard his voice nor seen his form, 38 nor does his word dwell in you, for you do not believe the one he sent. 39 You study the Scriptures diligently because you think that in them you have eternal life. These are the very Scriptures that testify about me, 40 yet you refuse to come to me to have life.
41 “I do not accept glory from human beings, 42 but I know you. I know that you do not have the love of God in your hearts. 43 I have come in my Father’s name, and you do not accept me; but if someone else comes in his own name, you will accept him. 44 How can you believe since you accept glory from one another but do not seek the glory that comes from the only God?
45 “But do not think I will accuse you before the Father. Your accuser is Moses, on whom your hopes are set. 46 If you believed Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote about me. 47 But since you do not believe what he wrote, how are you going to believe what I say?”
Luke 18:15-17
15 People were also bringing babies to Jesus for him to place his hands on them. When the disciples saw this, they rebuked them. 16 But Jesus called the children to him and said, “Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of God belongs to such as these. 17 Truly I tell you, anyone who will not receive the kingdom of God like a little child will never enter it.”
You will never understand the Holy Qur'an, lonewolf because of your hard heart, God has cursed you for being obstinate and for rejecting the Truth even if you recognize it as you would recognize your own son
Bread is already a type of food, and it also is one of the things consumed at a Seder, and now you are making bread to also be the lamb. I don't think that would work out too good, to have a Seder, and when the guests ask where the lamb is, you just tell them the bread is also lamb. You are just making up some sort of fantasy mash-up.
Consumption of the Lamb (bread) and the wine (blood) was done at the last supper, before his crucifiction.
None of this is described in the New Testament, where the crucifixion is playing out the Passover. There is no one-to-one correlation between the crucifixion and the celebration of the festival of Passover. Now obviously there was a correlation time-wise, where this was a very large gathering of Jews (for the festival) to witness the crucifixion event. Somewhere in the Gospels it describes Jesus as our Passover, but it is borrowing the imagery the Passover calls up, in order to convey a certain concept and we don't know for sure what that is exactly and could be something as simple as us identifying with Jesus as God's people, and it may not go further than that. Jesus'death does not interpret the Passover, it already having a specific interpretation which points back to the Exodus from Egypt.
This was a symbolism for the event about to unfold although today it should be done on Passover because the lamb and wine were consumed with bitter herbs on Passover.
I see the symbolism between the Lord's Supper and subsequent interpretations of Christ's work and our relationship to him, but I don't see it as relating to a Passover Seder, or the Passover itself being some sort of prophecy regarding Jesus' death. I definitely see nothing to recommend a Passover Seder as anything Christians should be participating in.
So we see the symbolism in the jewish Feast of Passover within the Last Supper. In the Last Supper we have the bread (Lamb) the wine (blood) and the sorrow (bitter herb) the disciples were to consume symbolized in like manner as Passover.
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by queenofangels_17
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by queenofangels_17
Jesus said, "If the flesh came into being because of spirit, it is a wonder. But if spirit came into being because of the body, it is a wonder of wonders. Indeed, I am amazed at how this great wealth has made its home in this poverty."
I hope you find the interpreation of this saying.
Why do you think quoting the Gnostic and non-canonical Gospel of Thomas is going to make headway with Christians? That passage is classic Gnostic dualism, the perfection of the spiritual and the evil nature of the material. Christ would never have said that.
That is exactly what he said... Jesus spoke in parables, but those with heavy hearts will never understand them until you spell it out to them.
If you believe only canonical gospels which Jesus never spoke, then you will never know nor will you have any idea of what the real Jesus said.
When you find the interpretation, maybe you will have an idea.
I know full well what it says, because I've studied the Gnostics a lot. Let me spell it out for you:
If the flesh came into being because of spirit, it is a wonder.
Evil flesh, coming into being through means of perfected spirit? That's wild!
But if spirit came into being because of the body, it is a wonder of wonders.
Perfect spirit, coming into being through evil flesh? That's just ridiculous!
Indeed, I am amazed at how this great wealth has made its home in this poverty.
It is amazing, indeed, that perfect spirit can be found residing in these corrupt material forms.
Those are all Gnostic views, completely contrary to Jewish and Christian beliefs, so, no, Jesus would never have said them.
YHVH is the Father and His Son is the Lord Jesus Christ of Nazareth.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by queenofangels_17
You will never understand the Holy Qur'an, lonewolf because of your hard heart, God has cursed you for being obstinate and for rejecting the Truth even if you recognize it as you would recognize your own son
There's nothing holy about a book written in lies and that condones lying. The very nature of your false prophet defies the Torah and that book along with him. That is all i need to know. The truth is staring you in the face and you're blind to it. I have wasted enough pearls on you.
Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
reply to post by NOTurTypical
YHVH is the Father and His Son is the Lord Jesus Christ of Nazareth.
Whoa... hang on.
Ive heard another christian here say that Jesus is actually YHVH.
But you say YHVH and His son are 2 seperate entities?
Which one of you is wrong?
Originally posted by queenofangels_17
reply to post by NOTurTypical
That's what you want to believe, Notur... but that doesn't make it true.
2:15 Whoso is wont to think through envy that Allah will not give him (Muhammad) victory in the world and the Hereafter and is enraged at the thought of his victory, let him stretch a rope up to the roof of his dwelling, and let him hang himself. Then let him see whether his strategy dispelleth that whereat he rageth! -
You are not even getting what i am saying so i'm just going to end it here, no point trying.
Both.
Ive heard another christian here say that Jesus is actually YHVH.
But you say YHVH and His son are 2 seperate entities?
Which one of you is wrong?
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by jmdewey60
Do you have any idea how confusing that is? I think they deliberately made it confusing so that no one would realize the truth...
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by queenofangels_17
You will never understand the Holy Qur'an, lonewolf because of your hard heart, God has cursed you for being obstinate and for rejecting the Truth even if you recognize it as you would recognize your own son
There's nothing holy about a book written in lies and that condones lying. The very nature of your false prophet defies the Torah and that book along with him. That is all i need to know. The truth is staring you in the face and you're blind to it. I have wasted enough pearls on you.
Originally posted by queenofangels_17
The disciples answered, "O Master, who shall that man be of whom you speak, who shall come into the world?" Jesus answered with joy of heart: 'He isMuhammad;, Messenger of God, and when he comes into the world, even as the rain makes the earth to bear fruit when for a long time it has not rained, even so shall he be occasion of good works among men, through the abundant mercy which he shall bring. For he is a white cloud full of the mercy of God, which mercy God shall sprinkle upon the faithful like rain.'
We have shown that the history and authenticity that Muslims attribute to the Gospel of Barnabas hold no credibility. Evidence from history, and from the document itself, show that it could have been written no earlier than the fourteenth century. The writer of the gospel could not have been the Barnabas of the New Testament. It is full of errors and contradictions and much of it is in conflict with Islam and the beliefs of the Ahmadiyya movement.
This gospel of Barnabas is a prime example of what happens when a spurious work is subjected to critical review. When all the errors and inconsistencies are considered, this gospel is exposed as a product of a ‘Pseudo-Barnabas’ who was never a first-century disciple of Jesus nor been in the land where Jesus walked and taught.
No, and I am taking you as meaning what I said was confusing, on its own it would not be, but a person could find themselves in a state of confusion brought on by having learned some inaccurate version of the explanation.
Do you have any idea how confusing that is?
You mean the New Testament writers? It may be that they had a broad audience so wanted a version that could be acceptable to the most people, so toned down the rhetoric so Jews were not put off right away. Some people may have been shocked to find out that who they took to be God was actually angels representing God.
I think they deliberately made it confusing so that no one would realize the truth...