False Flag Alert in Aurora : Biggest Mass Shooting in the History of the USA is not a coincidence

Originally posted by SpittinTruth
How long will this topic last??? The damage has been done, and the agenda has already been put into action; whether we like the agenda, or not. You know what the REAL problem is......who's watching the "authorities"? The way i see it, we have no representative, like a civilian police force. How do we know.....all this is on the "up and up"? How do we know the alleged shooter, doesn't work for TPTB, in order to further their agenda? Sure, this happened for a reason, and i HIGHLY doubt...it's the reason TV is spewing.

This is the same game being run on us...like it was run on 9-11. The authorities found the "terrorists" passports

in all that rubble; and knew EXACTLY who was responsible, within the matter of days. And, in the matter of months...the war drum was beating. However, in reality, the war drum had been beating since G.Dub #1's presidency. "They" just needed an "excuse". They, need to cause a problem, to get the reaction, so they could introduce the solution; which, of course, would be their agenda(s). Even though, the solution and agenda was written, years in advance.

TPTB don't play by the 'rules'. They make the rules...and then pay people to enforce them. Meanwhile, they're breaking all the laws...and LITERALLY getting away with murder. I bet you the alleged shooter, is chillin' somewhere in Dubai. Or maybe, he was shipped back to Iraq or Afghanistan. Never to be heard of again.

Honestly, we're better off just moving on to a new topic; like they want us to do. Nothing we say matters anyway. So, why bother??? Even IF our words woke some up....it's hardly enough. Especially, when there are MILLIONS of people unaware and uninformed.

Our cause is hopeless. And it will continue to be hopeless, until we cut the head off of the snake! And, that snake would be $$$$$$$$$$ "For the love of money is the root of all kinds of evil."

Yeah!!! what he said......money and power.....seriously................s

Originally posted by HolographicPrincipal
I just thought of something regarding the weird exchange with alleged killer's mother:
Isn't it possible that this news person/people described Holmes and the mother simply confirmed that they "have the right person" (paraphrased)? And it's just distorted to seem as if she is implicating her son?

Also... reports I've read (and most are pretty useless as far as delivering actual "news", but valuable in terms of broadcasting an agenda), have stated that Holmes was just "waiting" by his car with a small arsenal and his gas mask. Why then am I seeing pictures of the "crime scene", defined by the lone gas mask on the ground? Wouldn't the police have confiscated it at the time to include as evidence rather than leaving it there? It's an honest question... Perhaps someone who is familiar with procedure can clarify this for me.

The news reports are utterly useless, and some of them even wander into the realm of horrible reporting. Why isn't the general public noticing this? Too wrapped up in the emotional triggers?

well ok, if you're interested in questioning the "scene", here's a few more ...
first, let me say i agree with you ... there's toooo many questions in that scene photo

1. IF the blood trail were from an injured patron (as has been claimed), why didn't they kick/move the gun over by the door, out of their way ??
2. IF Holmes was "waiting" at the car, why is the gun (w/clip) on the ground by the door ?
3. IF he was at the car when officers arrived, planning re-entry, why is his gas-mask, air tank contraption lying on the ground several steps away ?
4. IF he was apprehended without resistance, why is the scene so scattered ?
one more ... 5. IF a bleeding patron exited the building, why is the blood trail leading in the wrong direction ??

It just doesn't add up!

....And another thing...

If Holmes exited during/right after the previews, don't you think more than one witness would have noticed this? Someone on phone (which is disruptive in a theatre to begin with) gets up from their seat in the front? Wouldn't pretty much everyone who is faced forward, looking at the screen notice this?

Originally posted by Xtrozero

Originally posted by Screwed

It just rubs me the wrong way when insecure men feel the need to talk about how big their dicks are durnig a time like this that's all.

That is kind of a funny statement since both guns we were talking about are rather small....

Sorry for hitting some nerve with you but that wasn't my intentions and that small sidebar was really mainly just to that one poster. I wasn't trying to bang my chest in any way.

Alright, then you were doing the unthinkable and talking about how small your dicks are.
Either way, it pisses me off that we have so many people HERE who can and WILL shoot motherF****rs like this
and drop them where they stand and yet?????

NOt a goddamned one of them to be found in that theater!!!!
Which would have been EPIC and would have finally given a boost to our beloved 2nd ammendment.

Sorry for being an A-hole.
This whole thing just has me pissed because I can so clearly see what is happening.

Anyone posted this yet?

truthseeker444.blogspot.co.uk...

Originally posted by HolographicPrincipal
It just doesn't add up!

....And another thing...

If Holmes exited during/right after the previews, don't you think more than one witness would have noticed this? Someone on phone (which is disruptive in a theatre to begin with) gets up from their seat in the front? Wouldn't pretty much everyone who is faced forward, looking at the screen notice this?

maybe you would and maybe not, most people were probably focused 100% on the previews/movie or talking to people next to them during previews which is what most people do anyway, its not the kind of thing that would stick out to you unless something like this happened, and even then im sure most of the people were happy to be alive/scared from what just happend.... not exactly focused that someone left the theater to take a phone call

Would it not be possible for the gunman to purchase the parts to the guns individually, and then assemble them? Its not illegal to own the parts (as far as I know) but as soon as you assemble said gun or firearm, it becomes illegal.

reply to post by Mach5


its easy enough to purchase guns in the US. All you need to do is wait 7 days and not be a convicted fellon. As for shotguns they sell those at Walmart, and just about any standard ammo. as far as parts i dont have a clue. but I'm sure someone here is in the know about that

reply to post by mattdel


I have Played Games my Entire Life ,I also have Shot and own several guns and regularly take my wife to the range .I have never felt the desire to do what this person did even though when i play games like Grand Theft or ModernWarfare i do get a kick out of the violence but its because i know its a game and thats the point ..Why this person did this i just dont know i pray however he wasnt somehow programmed if so just imagine how many others are programmed and have been and what the hell else is gonna be done

reply to post by Dyzan


Of course, the licensing and permit must have taken a tad of time...Especially for every single firearm he had. I assume (and guessing the kid's habits, wouldnt be surprised) it would be easier for him to simply anonymously acquire the parts and assemble them, purchasing the ammo separately. But in all retrospect, banning or restricting guns would be a rather counterproductive action in response to one of these tragic events occurring.

reply to post by Mach5


i dont think tighter gun laws would do jack squat. criminals no matter their history are able to get firearms no matter what. the only way to control guns is to get rid of them completely, no cops having guns no army having guns. a full ban on all guns past and present. of course this is flawed because there will be those few that say hell no and keep them.

apologize for the grammar/ technical errors. Beer makes me type like crap lol

Aurora was chosen for a reason:

1. Dark Knight Rising, Aurora means dawn. Mass killing in Aurora implies Dark Knight has rosen and dawn will not come(maybe someday in the future)

2. DIA, Denver international airport, i suspect it more than just an airport seeing the large scale and complicated underground structure. It' either a military base or a shelter camp for disaster that will be used in the future. The killing here may imply something related to this as well.

Just leaving this here for all the people who think making guns 100% illegal would actually solve the problem.

reply to post by behindXtheXveil
True, true...
Maybe I'm just hyper-perceptive... If I've been in theaters, looking at the screen, someone getting up always catches my eye. The moving silhouette is hard to avoid, especially if crossing the theatre (which who knows the exact trajectory of this dude).

I think a big chunk o' the problem is bad/misreporting. There are simply too few facts to glean from the articles I've read. A recently updated article in the Chicago Tribune
Colorado Shooting Timeline inexplicably cites this:

At about 9:45 a.m. MT, President Barack Obama spoke from Ft. Myers, Fla., where he was scheduled to make a campaign stop. He offered his condolences and reflecting on his personal feelings as he talked about savoring his daughters' embraces tonight. Republican presidential front runner Mitt Romney also issued a similar statement at a press conference and called the shooting an "unspeakable tragedy.

Um. Why is that an essential part of the shooting timeline? I noticed an additional article that once again pulls the presidential race into the topic. Why? A separate article dedicated to this, I could understand. But they are way out of context in these pieces.

Here's the second article I speak of. It's all over the place. Plop in some human interest, touch upon politics, throw in random information, and voila...Evidence Shows Months of Plotting

reply to post by Xaphan


Have to say it, that avatar is incredibly disrespectful to me.

reply to post by Ben81


I agree with you, S&F

There are too many holes in the picture.

As I was with some friends looking online. I saw the guy's photo, his apartment building and what the police were doing. Too many holes, I thought, now why would someone just come in and shoot people, and for what reason?

Now if the person is covered, head to toe, true, they can pin it on the most innocent guy ever and still get away with it.

Plus the guy or shooter was carrying a side arm and two main arms. The side arms and shotguns anyone can get, but the custom machine gun, that will be a little harder for anyone to obtain unless the person had a reason. And so far the reason I see is that the guy was a merc and he was doing what he was paid for in this fake paper we call money.

So, now they are pushing it and saying, no one can have guns in any shape or form.

Would that include the ones that are attached to my torso? Because their guns.

Something I really can't understand how people turn everything in a conspiracy theory

For the tear gas question: tear gas is not hard to be made, esspically for a person that's smart as they say.

The exit door question: he bought a ticket, went thru the exit door and left something to make sure it doesn't lock via a rock, tape, almost anythin.

How police knew about bloody trap question: Police guidelines in a case like that is to use a bomb robot to search the house and not to just knock down the door and run in.... Come on use logic...

And something else if they really false flag this wouldn't you think they make 110% sure the "pre-planned story" would be right?????

And another thing 1000% news reporters use info that they think is right in the first minutes of the story breaking to try to sell the news, somdon't make it a story that they messed up their "per-planned story"

reply to post by Directpowerhouse


He mentioned/hinted to the police about the explosives in his apartment, they don't just sent a bomb robot to every single criminal's home.

reply to post by IamMe14


I know he did, but in any case like this, with the type of arsenal he used. And the situation it's police guidelines to use a police bomb squad robot when searching a suspect's home At first time going in

Originally posted by Directpowerhouse
Something I really can't understand how people turn everything in a conspiracy theory

For the tear gas question: tear gas is not hard to be made, esspically for a person that's smart as they say.

The exit door question: he bought a ticket, went thru the exit door and left something to make sure it doesn't lock via a rock, tape, almost anythin.

How police knew about bloody trap question: Police guidelines in a case like that is to use a bomb robot to search the house and not to just knock down the door and run in.... Come on use logic...

And something else if they really false flag this wouldn't you think they make 110% sure the "pre-planned story" would be right?????

And another thing 1000% news reporters use info that they think is right in the first minutes of the story breaking to try to sell the news, somdon't make it a story that they messed up their "per-planned story"

and some of us (self included) will never understand why so many simply refuse to see what is directly in front of them.

i see you avoided mentioning the second assailant that was pursued into the Mall.
of course, you're sure he bought a ticket AT the venue, right ?
[he couldn't possibly have bought it in advance considering the show was sold-out]

video'd evacuees showed no signs of tear gas/pepper spray (likely a smoke bomb)
Holmes told the police about the explosives at the apartment

hmmmm, 110% on the story ?? why ??
when have they EVER in history and why would they now?

ok, here's a question for you ... over 100 witnesses to this event, yet we're only hearing from less than 10 of them ... WHY ??