Exclusive - Obama's Literary Agent in 1991 Booklet: 'Born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia and Haw

Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by Anon008

 

So if I didn't have access to your post, it proves you called Obama a Kenyan Pornstar with minions who disseminate his various nefarious orders to the Black Panther Party? edit on 20-5-2012 by Anon008 because: (no reason given)

Please, tell me what I accused him of.
I am saying that Mr. Obama was not properly vetted.

You have accused me of disliking him. I do not know him personally, so I don't harbor personal dislike for him. I think he sucks as a President, but I think that of all of the Presidents right on back to Andrew Jackson. I think he was a good one for this reason.

You don't dislike him you just think he sucks...I swear to God if I knew you in real life I would mock take away your 'Talking Card'.

Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
reply to post by Annee

 

No. I do know that the guy looks the same in 2 of the web sites pictures. Do you think anything he wrote in the article sounded made up or untrue?

Its a habit of mine to research the source of an article or author.

At the bottom of his credentials it gives his website: contrariansview.org

He is apparently good with the Stock Market - - - but he also seems to be into conspiracies.

I don't think I can give him credibility from what I've found. He's obviously intelligent - - but seems to be a bit of a "wacka-doodle".

About the author: Nick Chase is a retired but still very active technical writer, technical editor, computer programmer, and stock market newsletter writer. During his career he has produced documentation on computers, typewriters, typesetters, headline-makers, and other pieces of equipment most people never heard of, and he has programmed typesetting equipment. You can read more of his work at contrariansview.org. Read more: www.americanthinker.com...

Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by Anon008

 

You are going to quote your post.

You are claiming precognition now.
Do you understand why I mentioned the paranormal forum earlier?

Predicting and precognition are not the same. Two different words. The fuller segment quote said
"(let me save you some time. You are going to quote your post. I will then reply "This could have been easily photo shopped". To which you would HOPEFULLY understand what I just did to you, is what birthers do to Obama.) "

Also, what was it like growing up in Kenya under Obama's dictator grandfather?

reply to post by Anon008

I couldn't have put it much more clearly for you. I have no personal dislike for the man.
As a President, it is my opinion that he sucks at the job, just the rest of them, right back to Andrew Jackson.
If you can't comprehend that, I can't help you any further.
With regard to you making the attacks personal, there are some exercises that can help to relieve stress and aggression. Maybe some yoga?

Originally posted by Annee

Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
reply to post by Annee

 

No. I do know that the guy looks the same in 2 of the web sites pictures. Do you think anything he wrote in the article sounded made up or untrue?

Its a habit of mine to research the source of an article or author.

At the bottom of his credentials it gives his website: contrariansview.org

He is apparently good with the Stock Market - - - but he also seems to be into conspiracies.

I don't think I can give him credibility from what I've found. He's obviously intelligent - - but seems to be a bit of a "wacka-doodle".

About the author: Nick Chase is a retired but still very active technical writer, technical editor, computer programmer, and stock market newsletter writer. During his career he has produced documentation on computers, typewriters, typesetters, headline-makers, and other pieces of equipment most people never heard of, and he has programmed typesetting equipment. You can read more of his work at contrariansview.org. Read more: www.americanthinker.com...

I like how in the original article he points out that there could not have been multiple typewriters, and then proceeds to not give an explanation of why multiple typewriters cant be true. He sees what he want to see and hears what he wants to hear.

Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by Anon008

 

I couldn't have put it much more clearly for you. I have no personal dislike for the man.
As a President, it is my opinion that he sucks at the job, just the rest of them, right back to Andrew Jackson.
If you can't comprehend that, I can't help you any further.
With regard to you making the attacks personal, there are some exercises that can help to relieve stress and aggression. Maybe some yoga?

Yes, you do not dislike him personally, you just think he sucks professionally, which makes you above the suspicion of bias. How very unique of you. Your the most perfect snowflake.

reply to post by Anon008

Predicting and precognition are not the same. Two different words. The fuller segment quote said "(let me save you some time. You are going to quote your post. I will then reply "This could have been easily photo shopped". To which you would HOPEFULLY understand what I just did to you, is what birthers do to Obama.) "

And how much of the above took place?
Maybe you should try precognition.

Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by Anon008

 

Predicting and precognition are not the same. Two different words. The fuller segment quote said "(let me save you some time. You are going to quote your post. I will then reply "This could have been easily photo shopped". To which you would HOPEFULLY understand what I just did to you, is what birthers do to Obama.) "

And how much of the above took place?
Maybe you should try precognition.

Havn't you ever heard the saying that if you kill a butterfly in the past it alters the future?
I told you your own future, so it inherently changed.

lol, j/k, couldn't resist.

Did you think I was trying to predict the future or use a hypothetical scenario to engage your mind?

Or does your interest in the paranormal only extend to a witch hunt?

reply to post by Anon008

Did you think I was trying to predict the future or use a hypothetical scenario to engage your mind?

Honestly, I thought you were just being a troll.
If I went with my gut feeling, I would also say that I think that you are not a registered Republican. I am not accusing you of lying, just saying what my gut feeling is. It may have something to do with the vehemence with which you attack and how you look for a fight when there isn't one there, regarding Obama.

Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by Anon008

 

Did you think I was trying to predict the future or use a hypothetical scenario to engage your mind?

Honestly, I thought you were just being a troll.
If I went with my gut feeling, I would also say that I think that you are not a registered Republican. I am not accusing you of lying, just saying what my gut feeling is. It may have something to do with the vehemence with which you attack and how you look for a fight when there isn't one there, regarding Obama.

Yes, you use your gut feeling to decide a lot of things don't you?

Originally posted by Anon008

Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by Anon008

 

Did you think I was trying to predict the future or use a hypothetical scenario to engage your mind?

Honestly, I thought you were just being a troll.
If I went with my gut feeling, I would also say that I think that you are not a registered Republican. I am not accusing you of lying, just saying what my gut feeling is. It may have something to do with the vehemence with which you attack and how you look for a fight when there isn't one there, regarding Obama.

Yes, you use your gut feeling to decide a lot of things don't you?

No, as a matter of fact, I don't. But I do pay attention to them and try to keep track of how they pan out.
You make assumptions that are not valid.

Originally posted by butcherguy

Originally posted by Anon008

Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by Anon008

 

Did you think I was trying to predict the future or use a hypothetical scenario to engage your mind?

Honestly, I thought you were just being a troll.
If I went with my gut feeling, I would also say that I think that you are not a registered Republican. I am not accusing you of lying, just saying what my gut feeling is. It may have something to do with the vehemence with which you attack and how you look for a fight when there isn't one there, regarding Obama.

Yes, you use your gut feeling to decide a lot of things don't you?

No, as a matter of fact, I don't. But I do pay attention to them and try to keep track of how they pan out.
You make assumptions that are not valid.

Yes, your 100% correct. All your gut feelings should be 'kept track of' so that you can prove they were right. You should always listen to them, even when they tell you to follow a 17 year old black man in your car with a pistol, even when the police told you not to.

Don't listen to these other guys, your always going to be 100% correct when you follow your gut. Herp Derp.

//sarcasm off

Are you ready to call your gut feeling what it actually is yet?

Originally posted by blueorder
Hardly a "false" dilema, I am stunned by your level of fawning over your leader, what is that makes people prostrate themselves so- I shine lights on all leaders, black or white, and I pay no heed to children with their "birther" and "racist" pathetic insults

Are birthers all crazy?
I see no fawning of any kind in that post or any of the other non birther posts.
Shining a light is great until you start finding things that are not there. Those are hallucinations and you can see them with the light off too.
What is an insult about "birther?"

Originally posted by Anon008
reply to post by sad_eyed_lady

 

Vetting
en.wikipedia.org...
"Vetting is a process of examination and evaluation, generally referring to performing a background check on someone before offering them employment, conferring an award, etc. In addition, in intelligence gathering, assets are vetted to determine their usefulness."

You are asking who ran a background check on Obama, and that since no elected Democrat had vetted him, the Democratic party has fudged up. Let me first begin by stating the every US intelligence agency 'Vetts' presidential candidates. CIA FBI SS NSA, all of em.

You have any documents to back that up?

Originally posted by MsAphrodite
Just because you say it does not make it so. No, I am not a birther nor have I ever been one.


I am questioning the honesty of President Obama based on the evidence I have in front of me. Your obfuscation and attempts to label and insult me will not shut me up. Deal with it.

Honesty about what?
If it is not where he was born, isn't it a little off topic?
Also, you kind of already posted a lot of stuff about how it is about where he was born.
Why are birthers so afraid to own what it is that they are?

There is nothing bad about the word. I do not get that. It is hard to even begin to believe you are having an honest discussion with someone who says "I am not a birther but........I do not believe he is honest about being born in Hawaii."
That just sounds like "I am not a gas station attendant, I just work at a gas station attending to the place."

Originally posted by Autumnal


"I am not a gas station attendant, I just work at a gas station attending to the place."

Ah hahahah!

Nice

Originally posted by FoosM

Originally posted by Anon008
reply to post by sad_eyed_lady

 

Vetting
en.wikipedia.org...
"Vetting is a process of examination and evaluation, generally referring to performing a background check on someone before offering them employment, conferring an award, etc. In addition, in intelligence gathering, assets are vetted to determine their usefulness."

You are asking who ran a background check on Obama, and that since no elected Democrat had vetted him, the Democratic party has fudged up. Let me first begin by stating the every US intelligence agency 'Vetts' presidential candidates. CIA FBI SS NSA, all of em.

You have any documents to back that up?

Ok, how about this then,
Every Presidential Candidate has to go through multiple background checks, first their party does about 5(every candidate has background checks run by the party and every potential opponent within the party) then you have the background checks run by the opposing party, then each state has to fulfill their laws on certifying Presidential candidates with about 2/3rds of the states requiring background checks and all requiring certification of the candidates required forms (including their birth), then on the federal level all Presidential Candidates have a basic background check run by the FBI, Secret Service, NSA and Military Intelligences Services and all candidates who get at least 5% of the vote in Primaries are then given extensive background checks and Security Clearance Background Checks.

There are three more that I'm sure I missed.

Hell, we even USED to background check campaign contributors (thanks a lot Citizens United...).
www.washingtonpost.com...
You don't think ANYONE ran a background check on him?

So what then, is everyone who ran a background check on Obama in one giant conspiracy? Even Republican party officials?
Oh no! How much further does this rabbit hole go!?

Originally posted by Anon009

Thats some unintelligible mental acrobatics you just pulled on me, but let me put it this way.

erm, this stems from your weird "logic", so any "unintelligible mental acrobatics" are as a direct result of your nonsense comparing Obama's birthplace bio piece with the capital of a state

If the pamphlet said you were born in Tallahassee when you were actually born in Manhattan, would you need an eidetic memory or even access to a computer to know it was a fact checking error?

Right, now you have moved on to comparing a bio of another person (not someone close, but a bio of dozens of people) from 20 years ago with a pamphlet about yourself!?!?

I am doing mental acrobatics *chortles*

Here is the deal

- she wasn't doing a pamphlet about herself
- she wasn't doing a pamphlet about a state capital
- she was doing a pamplet for a client (out of dozens)
- in order to get his birth information she needed to ask Obama (or possibly someone close to him), hardly the same as knowing where you were born or the capital of a state
- she put Kenya
- either this was a "fact checking error" or Obama (or someone close to him) gave her this information

Regardless of how the info came about there is zilcho chance she can remember this particular snippet out of many from 20 years ago.

I am open minded to concede that it could have been a "fact checking error" (whilst laughing heartily at the notion she can definitely remenber this)- AS well as the possibility that Obama or someone close to him gave this- my money is on the latter, though I cannot prove it.

You are closed minded and just use terms of abuse in discussions "half retard" is a disgusting comment as well as your pathetic remarks towards older people who often are a damn sight wiser than younger folks, as evidenced by this thread..........

Originally posted by blueorder

Originally posted by Anon009

Thats some unintelligible mental acrobatics you just pulled on me, but let me put it this way.

erm, this stems from your weird "logic", so any "unintelligible mental acrobatics" are as a direct result of your nonsense comparing Obama's birthplace bio piece with the capital of a state

If the pamphlet said you were born in Tallahassee when you were actually born in Manhattan, would you need an eidetic memory or even access to a computer to know it was a fact checking error?

Right, now you have moved on to comparing a bio of another person (not someone close, but a bio of dozens of people) from 20 years ago with a pamphlet about yourself!?!?

I am doing mental acrobatics *chortles*

Here is the deal

- she wasn't doing a pamphlet about herself
- she wasn't doing a pamphlet about a state capital
- she was doing a pamplet for a client (out of dozens)
- in order to get his birth information she needed to ask Obama (or possibly someone close to him), hardly the same as knowing where you were born or the capital of a state
- she put Kenya
- either this was a "fact checking error" or Obama (or someone close to him) gave her this information

Regardless of how the info came about there is zilcho chance she can remember this particular snippet out of many from 20 years ago.

I am open minded to concede that it could have been a "fact checking error" (whilst laughing heartily at the notion she can definitely remenber this)- AS well as the possibility that Obama or someone close to him gave this- my money is on the latter, though I cannot prove it.

You are closed minded and just use terms of abuse in discussions "half retard" is a disgusting comment as well as your pathetic remarks towards older people who often are a damn sight wiser than younger folks, as evidenced by this thread..........

Yes I know hypothetical situations are sometimes hard to understand , and things like 'logic' and 'rationality' are just abstract concepts. Just keep trying and someday you will get there. I promise.
Oh, and stop *chortling* it makes you look like a cholde.

Originally posted by Autumnal

Are birthers all crazy?

more pathetic demonising terms

I see no fawning of any kind in that post or any of the other non birther posts.

you choosing what you want to read?

Shining a light is great until you start finding things that are not there. Those are hallucinations and you can see them with the light off too.

This pamphlet is there- either it was a "fact checking error" or Obama or someone close to him gave him this info, and there is jack s chance this Obama supporter/contributor actually remembers this specific detail from 20 years ago

What is an insult about "birther?"

it is used as a term of abuse by people who also throw about erroneous claims of being "crazy"

*sees the irony*