It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by stormy01399
What Gomes is saying is that he has found slight perturbations in the outer planets. If this planet were Nibiru it would be much more than slight perturbations as it would be entering the orbits of the known planets every 3600 years.
What Gomes is saying is that he has found slight perturbations in the outer planets.
Invited Speakers
Lia Athanassoula (Observatoire astronomique de Marseille-Provence) Galactic Dynamics (Brouwer Award)
Matija Cuk (SETI Inst.) Dynamics of Multiple Moon Systems
Matthew Hedman (Cornell U.) Dynamics of Dusty Rings
Soko Matsumura (U. Maryland) Dynamics of Exoplanets
Rachel Kuzio de Naray (Royal Military College of Canada) Velocity Fields and Dark Matter Halos
Local Organizing Committee
Alan W. Harris (Space Science Institute, chair)
Kevin Grazier (JPL)
Daniel J. Scheeres (University of Colorado Boulder)
Program Committee
Douglas P. Hamilton, University of Maryland (chair)
Alice Monet, US Naval Observatory (retired)
Wednesday, May 9:
8:00 am-Noon, Galaxies Session
2:00-6:00 pm, Asteroids Session
Free Evening
Last update: 2012-May-09 by Jessica Mink
dda.harvard.edu...
Originally posted by DeadSeraph
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by stormy01399
Also, I was under the impression the speculation in the OP's link is old news and has been talked about for years among astronomers? This just seems like a random article about someone saying something that has been said many times over the last decade or more?
According to National Geographic Gomes spoke on Tuesday. Tuesday was the 8th, not the 9th.
According to National Geographic Gomes spoke at the meeting in May 9
The objects' unexpected orbits have a few possible explanations, said Gomes, who presented his findings Tuesday at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society in Timberline Lodge, Oregon.
1:40PM - 2:00PM 05.01: Signatures Of A Putative Planetary Mass Solar Companion On The Orbital Distribution Of Tno's And Centaurs
- Rodney S. Gomes, Observatorio Nacional, Brazil.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Willease
And that's good enough for you?
Can't prove unicorns don't exist either. Do you believe in them?
It is impossible that any large body enters the inner Solar System on a regular basis. The orbits of the planets would be hopelessly disrupted.
If this is true, then who is to say if the remains of said planet is now in an elliptical orbit called Nibiru by an ancient civilization.
The Sumerians do not describe such an event (except in Sitchin's fantasy) but please elaborate.
By the way, the Sumerians aren't the only culture that describes the same celestial event.
Originally posted by Phage
It is impossible that any large body enters the inner Solar System on a regular basis. The orbits of the planets would be hopelessly disrupted.
Hopelessly disrupted... what's the official criteria for 'hopelessly disrupted'? You mean like, flipped over on their sides, belts of debris, wobbles in their axis,, periods of cometary and asteroid bombardments
Sitchin didn't really 'invent' anything, he translated a lost language to the best of his ability.
Originally posted by twitchy
Originally posted by Phage
It is impossible that any large body enters the inner Solar System on a regular basis. The orbits of the planets would be hopelessly disrupted.
It must be nice to make broad sweeping statements like that. No, it isn't impossiible.
It's 'unlikely' based on your own obviously biased observations of facts provided to you by corporate dominated science agencies and history books, both of which are quite notorious through the ages for their own biased observations, arrogance, secrecy, and dogma.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
So what qualifications do YOU have lets see your proof that what Phage says is wrong, lets see what you have, I take it you must be self taught or is it just the usual conspiracy cliches that many people like you on here roll out when required.
Does it not occur that if the science you claim is a fraud YOU wouldn't be on a computer on the net
ScienceDaily (Apr. 17, 2012) — New research suggests that billions of stars in our galaxy have captured rogue planets that once roamed interstellar space. The nomad worlds, which were kicked out of the star systems in which they formed, occasionally find a new home with a different sun. This finding could explain the existence of some planets that orbit surprisingly far from their stars, and even the existence of a double-planet system.
CAMBRIDGE, Mass., April 17 (UPI) -- Billions of stars in our galaxy may have captured rogue planets that once roamed interstellar space, adding them to their stellar families, U.S. scientists say.
The finding could explain the existence of planets that orbit surprisingly far from their stars, and even account for strange double-planet systems, the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics reported Tuesday.
"Stars trade planets just like baseball teams trade players," astrophysicist Hagai Perets said.
Rogue planets are a natural consequence of star formation, the researchers said, as newborn star systems often contain multiple planets.
If two planets interact, one can be ejected and become an interstellar traveler, and if it encounters a different star moving in the same direction at the same speed, it can hitch a ride.
Originally posted by thetruetruth719
reply to post by eriktheawful
True that is the way we have interpreted gravity and these other laws to 'work' based on evidence we can see and measure; but wouldnt technology that could distort, manipulate, and rearrange gravitiational pulls, not leave evidence because it corrects what it changes? I have no proof of this but let us wrap our 'you must prove it for truth' minds around our own moon's direction, rotation, and distance from 'Earth'. Illogical for natural event? #theyaresmarterthanwecanthinkatthispointinTIME...