It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by twitchy
Originally posted by wmd_2008
So what qualifications do YOU have lets see your proof that what Phage says is wrong, lets see what you have, I take it you must be self taught or is it just the usual conspiracy cliches that many people like you on here roll out when required.
Does it not occur that if the science you claim is a fraud YOU wouldn't be on a computer on the net
So, I claimed science was a fraud? Funny, I have a pretty decent memory and yet fail to recall that at all, I think I used words like corporate and dogma. I'm very curious as to what qualifications, self-teachings, or cliches you seem to think I would need to disagree with Phage though.
As to what I have, well, let's see...
Alan Parsons good enough source for you?edit on 16-5-2012 by twitchy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TWILITE22
who cares what it's called?If a rogue planet is floating around our solar system does it really matter what its name is?Am I missing something here?Whether its Nibiru,Tyche,or whatever isn't the point the idea that we could have a planet on the loose should be the main concern of this subject.
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by muzzleflash
Also another thing I don't see mentioned ever is the possibility that "If the ancient Mesopotamians created reliefs depicting a dozen or so celestial objects", we could be incorrectly assuming they are all planets.
Exactly. However we don't even need to go into apparent magnitudes. Mesopotamian cultures used different symbols to represent stars and planets. The cylinder seal that supposedly shows twelve planets only contains the symbols that were used for stars.
Originally posted by 1AnunnakiBastard
Originally posted by Telos
Originally posted by 1AnunnakiBastard
If he's correct, this could be the astronomical find that finally corroborates the translations of Sumerians tablets made by Zecharia Sitchin. The intriguing part is how this object is keeping itself hidden from Earth telescopes... Perhaps it's not really a planet... Perhaps it's artificial in nature...
1- Ancient Sumerian Dictionaries - PROVE SITCHIN IS NO EXPERT OF ANY KIND REGARDING SUMERIAN TEXTS AND DELIBERATELY MAKING IT UP AS HE GOES ALONG.
2- THERE ARE NO TEXTS ANYWHERE THAT SAY THE THINGS THAT SITCHIN CLAIMS.
Dude, seriously forget about Sitchin. Just answer how Hindu people have two 4,000 yo aeronautics treaties, named Vaimanika Sastra and Samarangana Sutradhara depicting aircrafts named "Vimanas", piloted by "space-gods", with details about the type of metal used in the hull, fuel, range flight, onboard weapons, crew capabilities and stuff like that?? Also a whole rich ancient literature describing massive wars between "sky-gods" using nuke devices and aerial vehicles and accurate depictions of a frigging nuclear fallout??
Originally posted by 1AnunnakiBastardYou know, all naysayers concentrate their fire power upon Sitchin and forget the scriptures left by other ancient civilizations, besides Sumerians, reporting the same "star-gods" such as the Mayan Popol Vuh that depicts bearded caucasian-like "gods" identical to the Anunnaki, as well as ancient Asian texts reporting "dragon-emperors" coming from the sky.
Originally posted by 1AnunnakiBastardNo matter how much you hate the ancient-alien theory or how much scholars claim that Sitchin mistranslated cuneiform tablets, because there are other scriptures from multiple cultures that reported the same thing the Sumerians reported.
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by Harte
After doing some quick double-checking, you're correct. However, the iconography for Sun is different from stars and planets. The reason Sitchin claimed Cylinder Seal VA243 depicted the solar system is because he thought the center object with six points depicted the Sun. In truth it is actually a symbol used to depict a star.
ScienceDaily (Mar. 22, 2012) — Seven years ago, astronomers boggled when they found the first runaway star flying out of our galaxy at a speed of 1.5 million miles per hour. The discovery intrigued theorists, who wondered: If a star can get tossed outward at such an extreme velocity, could the same thing happen to planets?
Humanity had been storing its nuclear waste in vast disposal sites on the far side of the Moon. Prefaced by wild emissions of an unknown form of magnetic radiation, the accumulated waste reaches critical mass and, on 13 September 1999, detonates in a massive thermonuclear explosion. The force of the blast propels the Moon like an enormous booster rocket, hurling it out of Earth orbit and into deep space at colossal speed, thus stranding the 311 personnel stationed on Alpha.[2] The runaway Moon, in effect, becomes the "spacecraft" on which the protagonists travel, searching for a new home. During their interstellar journey, the Alphans encounter an array of alien civilizations, dystopian societies, and mind-bending phenomena previously unseen by humanity.
Originally posted by 1AnunnakiBastard
reply to post by Phage
Regardless the possibility that Sitchin could have miscalculated the orbit of what the Sumerians called "Nibiru", just the fact that finally someone from INSIDE the club finally admitted the possible existence of this alleged rogue object, looks a pretty good step to start disclosing it.
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
After doing some quick double-checking, you're correct. However, the iconography for Sun is different from stars and planets. The reason Sitchin claimed Cylinder Seal VA243 depicted the solar system is because he thought the center object with six points depicted the Sun. In truth it is actually a symbol used to depict a star.