It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by CaptainLJB
of course you guys will say that both parties are one and the same
Originally posted by magma
And you are going to do what about it?
When push comes to shove...... You , like all the others will die fighting.
thats my point.
Originally posted by BIHOTZ
They want an uprising now that they can control instead of one later they cannot.
Originally posted by mountaingirl1111
What if the "force" were large-scale, game-ending weapons or, even better and effective... viruses or something that allowed the situation to take care of itself? Why use an army of men when you can use something more low-key?
Originally posted by jenlovesturtles
reply to post by LittleBlackEagle
I have to disagree with you about disarming us. When the floods happened in New Orleans the military went willingly with the local police going door to door collecting guns from people who had registered their firearms. Not just in the areas that were flooded but even in areas where there was no flood damage. Not all the military did this the older guys refused to do it but it was the young guys, the ones who have been trained to not question anything that did it you can find videos on youtube about it.
Originally posted by magma
The sad thing that people will actually not get too far with any uprising. We love to dream and be the hero but in fact we are the masses and we have no say.
we will be rounded up like sheep and led to the slaughter.
Shame
Originally posted by kgirl2002
reply to post by snarky412
"What better way for Obama to stay in charge..... no elections. How convenient. "
I recall saying the very same thing about the Bush administration after their second term. I was wrong.