It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Chemtrail Hoax

page: 26
26
<< 23  24  25    27  28  29 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 13 2011 @ 05:55 PM
link   
reply to post by Uncinus
 


You can suspect whatever you'd like. It's immaterial. They should not be spraying anything. And we will have to agree to disagree on whether that is happening as we speak.



posted on Aug, 14 2011 @ 04:27 PM
link   

Originally posted by Universer
reply to post by Uncinus
 


You can suspect whatever you'd like. It's immaterial. They should not be spraying anything. And we will have to agree to disagree on whether that is happening as we speak.


there's no evidence that they ARE "spraying" anything at all.

contrails are a visible manifestation of engine exhaust - but the exhaust is the same stuff at ground level or 35,000 ft - whether visible or not. the composition of the exhaust does not change just because you can see the water it is pumping out!



posted on Aug, 19 2011 @ 11:14 PM
link   
A lot of debunking but considering the number of approved PATENTS for weather 'modification' apparatus etc, I believe that we are fooling ourseleves if we continue to ignore what's happening in our skys:

Patents below from this source

1338343 - April 27, 1920 - Process And Apparatus For The Production of Intense Artificial Clouds, Fogs, or Mists
1619183 - March 1, 1927 - Process of Producing Smoke Clouds From Moving Aircraft
1631753 - June 7, 1927 - Electric Heater - Referenced in 3990987
1665267 - April 10, 1928 - Process of Producing Artificial Fogs
1892132 - December 27, 1932 - Atomizing Attachment For Airplane Engine Exhausts
1928963 - October 3, 1933 - Electrical System And Method
1957075 - May 1, 1934 - Airplane Spray Equipment
2097581 - November 2, 1937 - Electric Stream Generator - Referenced in 3990987
2409201 - October 15, 1946 - Smoke Producing Mixture
2476171 - July 18, 1945 - Smoke Screen Generator
2480967 - September 6, 1949 - Aerial Discharge Device
2550324 - April 24, 1951 - Process For Controlling Weather
2510867 - October 9, 1951 - Method of Crystal Formation and Precipitation
2582678 - June 15, 1952 - Material Disseminating Apparatus For Airplanes
2591988 - April 8, 1952 - Production of TiO2 Pigments - Referenced in 3899144
2614083 - October 14, 1952 - Metal Chloride Screening Smoke Mixture
2633455 - March 31, 1953 - Smoke Generator
2688069 - August 31, 1954 - Steam Generator - Referenced in 3990987
2721495 - October 25, 1955 - Method And Apparatus For Detecting Minute Crystal Forming Particles Suspended in a Gaseous Atmosphere
2730402 - January 10, 1956 - Controllable Dispersal Device
2801322 - July 30, 1957 - Decomposition Chamber for Monopropellant Fuel - Referenced in 3990987
2881335 - April 7, 1959 - Generation of Electrical Fields
2908442 - October 13, 1959 - Method For Dispersing Natural Atmospheric Fogs And Clouds
2986360 - May 30, 1962 - Aerial Insecticide Dusting Device
2963975 - December 13, 1960 - Cloud Seeding Carbon Dioxide Bullet
3126155 - March 24, 1964 - Silver Iodide Cloud Seeding Generator - Referenced in 3990987
3127107 - March 31, 1964 - Generation of Ice-Nucleating Crystals
3131131 - April 28, 1964 - Electrostatic Mixing in Microbial Conversions
3174150 - March 16, 1965 - Self-Focusing Antenna System
3234357 - February 8, 1966 - Electrically Heated Smoke Producing Device
3274035 - September 20, 1966 - Metallic Composition For Production of Hydroscopic Smoke
3300721 - January 24, 1967 - Means For Communication Through a Layer of Ionized Gases
3313487 - April 11, 1967 - Cloud Seeding Apparatus
3338476 - August 29, 1967 - Heating Device For Use With Aerosol Containers - Referenced in 3990987
3410489 - November 12, 1968 - Automatically Adjustable Airfoil Spray System With Pump
3429507 - February 25, 1969 - Rainmaker
3432208 - November 7, 1967 - Fluidized Particle Dispenser
3441214 - April 29, 1969 - Method And Apparatus For Seeding Clouds
3445844 - May 20, 1969 - Trapped Electromagnetic Radiation Communications System
3456880 - July 22, 1969 - Method Of Producing Precipitation From The Atmosphere
3518670 June 30, 1970 - Artificial Ion Cloud
3534906 - October 20, 1970 - Control of Atmospheric Particles
3545677 - December 8, 1970 - Method of Cloud Seeding
3564253 - February 16, 1971 - System And Method For Irradiation Of Planet Surface Areas
3587966 - June 28, 1971 - Freezing Nucleation
3601312 - August 24, 1971 - Methods of Increasing The Likelihood oF Precipatation By The Artificial Introduction Of Sea Water Vapor Into The Atmosphere Winward Of An Air Lift Region
3608810 - September 28, 1971 - Methods of Treating Atmospheric Conditions
3608820 - September 20, 1971 - Treatment of Atmospheric Conditions by Intermittent Dispensing of Materials Therein
3613992 - October 19, 1971 - Weather Modification Method
3630950 - December 28, 1971 - Combustible Compositions For Generating Aerosols, Particularly Suitable For Cloud Modification And Weather Control And Aerosolization Process
USRE29142 - This patent is a reissue of patent US3630950 - Combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process
3659785 - December 8, 1971 - Weather Modification Utilizing Microencapsulated Material
3666176 - March 3, 1972 - Solar Temperature Inversion Device
3677840 - July 18, 1972 - Pyrotechnics Comprising Oxide of Silver For Weather Modification Use
3722183 - March 27, 1973 - Device For Clearing Impurities From The Atmosphere
3769107 - October 30, 1973 - Pyrotechnic Composition For Generating Lead Based Smoke
3784099 - January 8, 1974 - Air Pollution Control Method
3785557 - January 15, 1974 - Cloud Seeding System
3795626 - March 5, 1974 - Weather Modification Process
3808595 - April 30, 1974 - Chaff Dispensing System
3813875 - June 4, 1974 - Rocket Having Barium Release System to Create Ion Clouds In The Upper Atmopsphere
3835059 - September 10, 1974 - Methods of Generating Ice Nuclei Smoke Particles For Weather Modification And Apparatus Therefore
3835293 - September 10, 1974 - Electrical Heating Aparatus For Generating Super Heated Vapors - Referenced in 3990987
3877642 - April 15, 1975 - Freezing Nucleant
3882393 - May 6, 1975 - Communications System Utilizing Modulation of The Characteristic Polarization of The Ionosphere
3896993 - July 29, 1975 - Process For Local Modification of Fog And Clouds For Triggering Their Precipitation And For Hindering The Development of Hail Producing Clouds
3899129 - August 12, 1975 - Apparatus for generating ice nuclei smoke particles for weather modification
3899144 - August 12, 1975 - Powder contrail generation
3940059 - February 24, 1976 - Method For Fog Dispersion
3940060 - February 24, 1976 - Vortex Ring Generator
3990987 - November 9, 1976 - Smoke generator
3992628 - November 16, 1976 - Countermeasure system for laser radiation
3994437 - November 30, 1976 - Broadcast dissemination of trace quantities of biologically active chemicals
4042196 - August 16, 1977 - Method and apparatus for triggering a substantial change in earth characteristics and measuring earth changes
RE29,142 - February 22, 1977 - Reissue of: 03630950 - Combustible compositions for generating aerosols, particularly suitable for cloud modification and weather control and aerosolization process
4035726 - July 12, 1977 - Method of controlling and/or improving high-latitude and other communications or radio wave surveillance systems by partial control of radio wave et al
4096005 - June 20, 1978 - Pyrotechnic Cloud Seeding Composition
4129252 - December 12, 1978 - Method and apparatus for production of seeding materials
4141274 - February 27, 1979 - Weather modification automatic cartridge dispenser
4167008 - September 4, 1979 - Fluid bed chaff dispenser
4347284 - August 31, 1982 - White cover sheet material capable of reflecting ultraviolet rays
4362271 - December 7, 1982 - Procedure for the artificial modification of atmospheric precipitation as well as compounds with a dimethyl sulfoxide base for use in carrying out said procedure
4402480 - September 6, 1983 - Atmosphere modification satellite
4412654 - November 1, 1983 - Laminar microjet atomizer and method of aerial spraying of liquids
4415265 - November 15, 1983 - Method and apparatus for aerosol particle absorption spectroscopy
4470544 - September 11, 1984 - Method of and Means for weather modification
4475927 - October 9, 1984 - Bipolar Fog Abatement System
4600147 - July 15, 1986 - Liquid propane generator for cloud seeding apparatus
4633714 - January 6, 1987 - Aerosol particle charge and size analyzer
4643355 - February 17, 1987 - Method and apparatus for modification of climatic conditions
4653690 - March 31, 1987 - Method of producing cumulus clouds
4684063 - August 4, 1987 - Particulates generation and removal
4686605 - August 11, 1987 - Method and apparatus for altering a region in the earth's atmosphere, ionosphere, and/or magnetosphere
4704942 - November 10, 1987 - Charged Aerosol
4712155 - December 8, 1987 - Method and apparatus for creating an artificial electron cyclotron heating region of plasma
4744919 - May 17, 1988 - Method of dispersing particulate aerosol tracer
4766725 - August 30, 1988 - Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor
4829838 - May 16, 1989 - Method and apparatus for the measurement of the size of particles entrained in a gas
4836086 - June 6, 1989 - Apparatus and method for the mixing and diffusion of warm and cold air for dissolving fog
4873928 - October 17, 1989 - Nuclear-sized explosions without radiation
4948257 - August 14, 1990 - Laser optical measuring device and method for stabilizing fringe pattern spacing
4948050 - August 14, 1990 - Liquid atomizing apparatus for aerial spraying
4999637 - March 12, 1991 - Creation of artificial ionization clouds above the earth
5003186 - March 26, 1991 - Stratospheric Welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming
5005355 - April 9, 1991 - Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor
5038664 - August 13, 1991 - Method for producing a shell of relativistic particles at an altitude above the earths surface
5041760 - August 20, 1991 - Method and apparatus for generating and utilizing a compound plasma configuration
5041834 - August 20, 1991 - Artificial ionospheric mirror composed of a plasma layer which can be tilted
5056357 - October 15, 1991- Acoustic method for measuring properties of a mobile medium
5059909 - October 22, 1991 - Determination of particle size and electrical charge
5104069 - April 14, 1992 - Apparatus and method for ejecting matter from an aircraft
5110502 - May 5, 1992 - Method of suppressing formation of contrails and solution therefor
5156802 - October 20, 1992 - Inspection of fuel particles with acoustics
5174498 - December 29, 1992 - Cloud Seeding
5148173 - September 15, 1992 - Millimeter wave screening cloud and method
5245290 - September 14, 1993 - Device for determining the size and charge of colloidal particles by measuring electroacoustic effect
5286979 - February 15, 1994 - Process for absorbing ultraviolet radiation using dispersed melanin
5296910 - March 22, 1994 - Method and apparatus for particle analysis
5327222 - July 5, 1994 - Displacement information detecting apparatus
5357865 - October 25, 1994 - Method of cloud seeding
5360162 - November 1, 1994 - Method and composition for precipitation of atmospheric water
5383024 - January 17, 1995 - Optical wet steam monitor
5425413 - June 20, 1995 - Method to hinder the formation and to break-up overhead atmospheric inversions, enhance ground level air circulation and improve urban air quality
5434667 - July 18, 1995 - Characterization of particles by modulated dynamic light scattering
5441200 - August 15, 1995 - Tropical cyclone disruption
5486900 - January 23, 1996 - Measuring device for amount of charge of toner and image forming apparatus having the measuring device
5556029 - September 17, 1996 - Method of hydrometeor dissipation (clouds)
5628455 - May 13, 1997 - Method and apparatus for modification of supercooled fog
5631414 - May 20, 1997 - Method and device for remote diagnostics of ocean-atmosphere system state
5639441 - June 17, 1997 - Methods for fine particle formation
5762298 - June 9, 1998 - Use of artificial satellites in earth orbits adaptively to modify the effect that solar radiation would otherwise have on earth's weather
5912396 - June 15, 1999 - System and method for remediation of selected atmospheric conditions
5922976 - July 13, 1999 - Method of measuring aerosol particles using automated mobility-classified aerosol detector
5949001 - September 7, 1999 - Method for aerodynamic particle size analysis
5984239 - November 16, 1999 - Weather modification by artificial satellite
6025402 - February 15, 2000 - Chemical composition for effectuating a reduction of visibility obscuration, and a detoxifixation of fumes and chemical fogs in spaces of fire origin
6030506 - February 29, 2000 - Preparation of independently generated highly reactive chemical species
6034073 - March 7, 2000 - Solvent detergent emulsions having antiviral activity
6045089 - April 4, 2000 - Solar-powered airplane
6056203 - May 2, 2000 - Method and apparatus for modifying supercooled clouds
6110590 - August 29, 2000 - Synthetically spun silk nanofibers and a process for making the same
6263744 - July 24, 2001 - Automated mobility-classified-aerosol detector
6281972 - August 28, 2001 - Method and apparatus for measuring particle-size distribution
6315213 - November 13, 2001 - Method of modifying weather
6382526 - May 7, 2002 - Process and apparatus for the production of nanofibers
6408704 - June 25, 2002 - Aerodynamic particle size analysis method and apparatus
6412416 - July 2, 2002 - Propellant-based aerosol generation devices and method
6520425 - February 18, 2003 - Process and apparatus for the production of nanofibers
6539812 - April 1, 2003 - System for measuring the flow-rate of a gas by means of ultrasound
6553849 - April 29, 2003 - Electrodynamic particle size analyzer
6569393 - May 27, 2003 - Method and device for cleaning the atmosphere

I suggest a good read of the link above as there's a lot of data about what's being sprayed and how (Titanium dioxide etc).



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 10:37 AM
link   
reply to post by SpaceJockey1
 


That patent list dates back to 1920. So you think they've been planning chemtrails since then, and only just started implementing the plan?

Anyway, everyone knows that weather modification is nothing new. People have been cloud seeding for decades. Obviously there will be cloud seeding patents. So which of those patents have anything to do with "chemtrails"



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 06:21 PM
link   
reply to post by Uncinus
 


I agree that weather modification has gone on for many years, and have no doubt that what is claimed to be chemtrails, is most likely connected to that. It's the claiming that what people are seeing is just 'contrails', is what bites!

As soon as you start adding things like Silver Iodine and Barrium etc, it becomes CHEMTRAILS in my book.

Knowing how many times our governments have EXPERIMENTS & LIED to the unsuspecting public, it's our DUTY to question EVERYTHING.

---

Weather modification started as early as 1903! (BTW not all is aerial. Cloud seeding can be done by ground generators, plane, or rocket)

Referring to the 1903, 1915, 1919 and 1944 and 1947 weather modification experiments, the Australian Federation of Meteorology discounted "rain making." By the 1950s the CSIRO Division of Radiophysics switched to investigating the physics of clouds and had hoped by 1957 to better understand these processes. By the 1960s the dreams of weather making had faded only to be re-ignited post-corporatisation of the Snowy Mountains Scheme in order to achieve "above target" water. This would provide enhanced energy generation and profits to the public agencies who are the principal owners. Cloud seeding has been shown to be effective in altering cloud structure and size and in converting supercooled liquid water to ice particles. The amount of precipitation due to seeding is difficult to quantify. Cloud seeding may also suppress precipitation. An Austrian study to use silver iodine seeding for hail prevention ran during 1981–2000, and the technique is still actively deployed there.

During the sixties, Irving P. Krick & Associates operated a successful cloud seeding operation in the area around Calgary, Alberta. This utilized both aircraft and ground-based generators that pumped silver iodide into the atmosphere in an attempt to reduce the threat of hail damage. Ralph Langeman, Lynn Garrison, and Stan McLeod, all ex-members of the RCAF's 403 Squadron, attending the University of Alberta, spent their summers flying hail suppression. A number of surplus Harvard aircraft were fitted with racks under each wing containing 32 railroad fuzees that were impregnated with silver iodide. These could be ignited individually or all at once, depending upon the threat. In coordination with ground units, the aircraft would lay a plume of silver iodide in front of approaching cumulo-nimbus clouds with noticeable effect. Large, active CBs were reduced to nothing. Heavy hail storms were reduced in intensity. This effective program was funded by farmer contributions and government grants

In August 1952, the RAF in Britain conducted Operation Cumulus, which involved gliders spraying clouds with dry ice, salt or silver iodide. Within days North Devon received 250 times its normal August rainfall. The town of Lynmouth was virtually washed away and 35 people were killed.
Source

Quote from above link:



John Forrest - who says 40 countries, including South Africa, the United States and China practise weather modification - visited Texas last year, where cloud seeding is practised over a third of the state. Like AMC, he says pollution is hampering rainfall, but cloud seeding with salt will fix it.


There's ample evidence that there's spraying going on in our skys.
edit on 20-8-2011 by SpaceJockey1 because: Sentence addition



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 11:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by SpaceJockey1

I agree that weather modification has gone on for many years, and have no doubt that what is claimed to be chemtrails, is most likely connected to that. It's the claiming that what people are seeing is just 'contrails', is what bites!

As soon as you start adding things like Silver Iodine and Barrium etc, it becomes CHEMTRAILS in my book.


I think though that most people are looking at long white spreading lines in the sky, when they talk about "chemtrails". Seems like you mean something different? Just simple cloud seeding?



posted on Aug, 20 2011 @ 11:40 PM
link   
reply to post by Uncinus
 


It's not just 'simple' cloud seeding, when it has additional chemicals added that can be classed as TOXIC.

The simple difference with contrails & chemtrails is one's a natural occurance and isn't what we're concerned about, the other is the chemical 'soup' that's being sprayed and takes a lot longer to disperse.

Hell, governments put TOXIC fluoride in people's water, they add mercury to vacinnes, they add DU to shells and hundreds of other things...trouble is it's generally many years later that the effects actually catch-up, and people start asking questions.

Have you ever researched de-classified black budget programs from the last 70 or so years, to see what sort of things many governments have been involved in? Trouble is that it's usually many many years later that we get to know. So many tests have been done on the unsuspecting public, that it makes you hair stand on end!

So I personally like to remain suspicious and vigilante



posted on Aug, 21 2011 @ 08:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by SpaceJockey1

It's not just 'simple' cloud seeding, when it has additional chemicals added that can be classed as TOXIC.

The simple difference with contrails & chemtrails is one's a natural occurance and isn't what we're concerned about, the other is the chemical 'soup' that's being sprayed and takes a lot longer to disperse.

Hell, governments put TOXIC fluoride in people's water, they add mercury to vacinnes, they add DU to shells and hundreds of other things...trouble is it's generally many years later that the effects actually catch-up, and people start asking questions.


It's appropriate to be suspicious of the people in power. They do bad things sometimes. I just don't see any visual difference between what people point to as "chemtrails" and regular persistent contrails.

In addition there's a HUGE amount of bunk floating around the topic - such as the highly inaccurate chemical tests - which I think casts significant doubt on the whole theory.

You can't base such a specific theory simply on suspicion - there has to be some actual evidence that the trails are different. Right now all we seem to have is that some people don't recall trails like this, but then lots of other people do, and most people don't even think about it. Plus the science books seem and the historical record to indicate trails have always been like this. Not a great basis for the theory, no matter how evil you think the worlds governments are.



posted on Aug, 21 2011 @ 04:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by SpaceJockey1
reply to post by Uncinus
 


It's not just 'simple' cloud seeding, when it has additional chemicals added that can be classed as TOXIC.


So what are these additional chemicals in cloud seeding??


The simple difference with contrails & chemtrails is one's a natural occurance and isn't what we're concerned about, the other is the chemical 'soup' that's being sprayed and takes a lot longer to disperse.


So what is in this chemical soup??

Why can't anyone actually find any evidence of it??



Hell, governments put TOXIC fluoride in people's water, they add mercury to vacinnes, they add DU to shells and hundreds of other things...


None of which are "chemtrails".

And given that the mercury in vaccines is beign phased out, fluoride isnt' all that toxic in the levels people are getting it in their water, and shells are designed to kill people anyway - what is hte link with chemtrails??


trouble is it's generally many years later that the effects actually catch-up, and people start asking questions.


Which is fair enough - but at least in these, and other cases we know that ther is somethign that exists - thiomersal, depleted uranium, fluoride - all these things exist - you can test for them and find them.

Not so with "chemtails" - no one knows what they are, nothing has ever been found that resembles what htey supposedly are, and there are several different theories as to what they might be - none of which actually have any verifiable evidence to support them.


Have you ever researched de-classified black budget programs from the last 70 or so years, to see what sort of things many governments have been involved in? Trouble is that it's usually many many years later that we get to know. So many tests have been done on the unsuspecting public, that it makes you hair stand on end!

So I personally like to remain suspicious and vigilante


By al means be suspicious - but suspicion should be about evaluating evidence to see whether the suspicion is founded - not leaping immediately to the conclusion that it is true DESPITE the evidence as so many chemmie seem to do!



posted on Aug, 22 2011 @ 06:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by SpaceJockey1
reply to post by Uncinus
 


I
In August 1952, the RAF in Britain conducted Operation Cumulus, which involved gliders spraying clouds with dry ice, salt or silver iodide. Within days North Devon received 250 times its normal August rainfall. The town of Lynmouth was virtually washed away and 35 people were killed.
Source


how about including het very next sentence from that quote:


The link between the experiments and the flood has not been proved and cloud seeding over mainland Australia has also been inconclusive, according to the CSIRO.





There's ample evidence that there's spraying going on in our skys.


There has never been any doubt that there is spraying of various types going on, so why are you so surprised by it??


But such spraying is not what chemtrails are.

chemtrails are high altitude, visible trails, covering long distances, invariably in clear blue skies, that supposedly are doing somethign secret - whether it be geoengineering the sky or the ground, poisoning us to achieve population control or amplifying HAARP.

They started in the mid 1990's - so cloud seeding from the 1950's and earlier cannot possibly be part of the conspiracy!



posted on Aug, 22 2011 @ 08:22 PM
link   
I think it's funny that after all the years that have gone by since the original knowledgeable post was made, it's like it was never made at all the the claims still persist. lol

Cloud seeding experimentation has been done on what amounts to an incredibly small scale. And the funny part is that under normal circumstances... it wouldn't leave any visible 'trail' at all. Ironically, the companies that have been involved with these small scale experimental efforts, actually have had to be somewhat discreet... Not because what they're doing is so terrible... but because the whole "chem-trail" thing has gotten so nuts, that they're actually afraid to publicly announce that they're doing what they do. In a time when 'eco-terorrists' do insane things like torching whole lots of new automobiles and starting forest fires... who knows what some of these people are capable of. So when you've got millions of dollars of aircraft sitting out in the open... you think they''re going to give some nuts a reason to set them on fire or something? So it's a case of a self-fulfilling conspiracy. The claim of a conspiracy, is actually what created secrecy. Not the other way around.

On patents... I've heard patents be used as 'proof' of something or another happening in the past. The truth is, anybody can file a patent on anything. If I wanted to file a patent tomorrow on an anti gravity car that can go to the moon and back... all I'd have to do is follow the basic requirements, submit my documents, pay the fee... and bam... There's my patent. Does that mean it will work? No. Does it mean anybody is ever going to make it? No. So that's not really proof of anything. Large corporations basically patent the crap out of anything they can think of, in the slight chance it ever gets produced. Then they can claim they own it. Most of it never gets made, nor is it possible to make.



posted on Aug, 31 2011 @ 01:10 PM
link   

Originally posted by Warpspeed
It is only happening in America, so it is not some secret plan to save the planet. It is something the American government are doing to Americans.


You obviously haven't traveled much. You can see plenty of contrails all over the world. So if this was a global conspiracy it would have to involve the air forces of hundreds of countries. including places like China and Russia with whom we don't get along that well.



posted on Sep, 7 2011 @ 02:53 AM
link   
Finnally!!! an article about these things that make sense thanks for shareing.



posted on Dec, 15 2011 @ 03:55 PM
link   
reply to post by ANOK
 


Thank you. I sincerely appreciate all the people on this thread that are trying to wake people up to the fact that something is being sprayed into the air and that it is Not Contrails and it is most certainly not normal. I thank all of you. This is a very important topic.



posted on Dec, 15 2011 @ 04:04 PM
link   
reply to post by SpaceJockey1
 

Thank you. I completely agree with your reasoning here. It is quite surprising to me that people are still debating the existence of chemtrails. At this point, it is blatantly obvious, at least to me, that chemtrails are real and dangerous to health.



posted on Dec, 15 2011 @ 04:23 PM
link   
The debate goes on because there's no proof other ther heresay and chemtrail websites. Kina like FEMA camps and no planers hurmous at best



posted on Dec, 15 2011 @ 04:37 PM
link   
If I really did want to spray chemicals all over the place for some unknown, irrational reason... Why would I not add an element to those chemicals that prevented freezing. That would allow the chemicals to distribute themselves much more widely while spraying, and most of all... completely eliminate lasting trails.

But of course... This will be just another logical point that the believers will dismiss.



posted on Dec, 15 2011 @ 04:45 PM
link   
reply to post by dpd11
 


Right up there with the fact that if it is in the fuel then the most obvious place for "finding it in the air" would be next to an airport - where airliners are using maximum thrust to take off at low altitude in large numbers - and not out in the wilderness/countryside thousands of feet under high level fligth routes that are not actually all that heavily flown compared to airport runways....



posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 06:06 PM
link   
What a load of bologna. Chemtrails are real.



posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 06:27 PM
link   
reply to post by aBlueRAY
 


And of course that is why no one has ever managed to present any verifiable evidence of their existence - it is the lack of evidence that proves they exist right??





new topics

top topics



 
26
<< 23  24  25    27  28  29 >>

log in

join