It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LDragonFire
Its my opinion the baby boomer generation have lead us to this place, there fear and welcoming of a police state will not be tolerated by the younger generations.
Go kids!!! fix what your parents have broken!!!!
Originally posted by jlv70
reply to post by tankerpilot
Right here.
Soros: not a funder of Wall Street protests
Is Reuters good enough for you?
www.reuters.com...
Originally posted by LDragonFire
Its my opinion the baby boomer generation have lead us to this place, there fear and welcoming of a police state will not be tolerated by the younger generations.
Go kids!!! fix what your parents have broken!!!!
Originally posted by Aim64C
For the life of me, I will never understand why it is some people feel existence is an inherent right. The right to life is the right to experience the peculiar and temporary experience we all share. It's not a concept that affords one food, shelter, and healthcare on account of being alive. Life is temporary, regardless, and the end of one's experience cannot be guaranteed by birthright.
By no means does that mean we should not help each other out - but it would seem to be a particularly destructive mentality to presume others are obligated to provide for one's self; or that anyone other than one's own self is obligated to charitable deeds.
I find it quite repulsive that the "poor" and "underprivileged" have been reduced to a political fulcrum of leverage. They are given money and benefit programs in exchange for votes or as a mask for more controversial legislation. Even worse is the popular fallacy that argues the poor and underprivileged are only able to survive because of government programs (or charities). Not only is their capacity for accomplishment insulted by such approaches; they are expected to remain in a politically favorable state (where people can make more programs for the poor and appear to be better beings for it).
It's all a charade. It's not about having a group of people that can always be stood upon for personal gain. "We're helping the poor. We're good people. That's why we need you to give us the power to take more money from people."
No matter how you look at it - that is what these "for the poor" or "against the rich" movements or articles of legislation add up to. After all is said and done - the poor stay the poor, and some douche will always be using them as some kind of soap box.
Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by spacedonk
I'll be down at Wall St supporting OWS this Spring. I expect many fireworks.
"It's ironic that the 1st window broken at #OWS was because an officer threw a protester into a window." #KellyMustResign
4:44 PM - 20 Mar 12