It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by tomd1111
I would also handle discipline much different with a girl then a boy.
Originally posted by tomd1111
My two main points really don't have to do with the actual act of hitting a child so I guess I should of stayed out of this one but my general feelings are that the government shouldn't be meddling in childcare minus abuse, there "needs" to be a mix of respect, love, fear of consequences, etc.,
Originally posted by tomd1111
AND many in this country go WAY WAY WAY to far with being sensitive and far too liberal. Nothing makes me want to puke on parents more than seeing youth sports with no winner so that nobody gets there feelings hurt. Other countries are making us look silly due to our weakness and the fear that parents have to discipline their own children......Then after the baseball game with no winner the kids can come home to watch M. Obama on Ellen talk about turkey burgers an why a real one would be evil ..
Originally posted by tomd1111
When and if I have kids I will be driving home from that game they played awful in telling them how much they sucked in a supportive way by either working on their skills or finding something they are good at, all while talking it over eating a double cheeseburger with the small chance of me giving one a "tap" if they get out of line. Let's get America back!
Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
The fact is...
If you currently discipline your child by hitting them, whether it's right or wrong, you WILL support it.
Why? Because you do it, and you have to justify yourself somehow... otherwise you will feel like a complete #
So who are you really trying to convince..... yourself?
Originally posted by hp1229
Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
The fact is...
If you currently discipline your child by hitting them, whether it's right or wrong, you WILL support it.
Why? Because you do it, and you have to justify yourself somehow... otherwise you will feel like a complete #
So who are you really trying to convince..... yourself?
Is this fact based on personal experience?
Just curious. I even wonder how many people on this thread are parents.
Originally posted by Biliverdin
Originally posted by hp1229
Originally posted by v1rtu0s0
The fact is...
If you currently discipline your child by hitting them, whether it's right or wrong, you WILL support it.
Why? Because you do it, and you have to justify yourself somehow... otherwise you will feel like a complete #
So who are you really trying to convince..... yourself?
Is this fact based on personal experience?
Just curious. I even wonder how many people on this thread are parents.
Whether or not all those contributing have experienced being parents, we have all, without exception, been kids and therefore have a valid opinion and experience to contribute.
but I am raising a free-thinker
Originally posted by BelieveInEnochAs f
ar as adapting to society: I'm not sure what you are referring to but society is falling. Yeah, they have adapted to broken homes/marriages, gay propaganda, sex constantly bombarding them everywhere, and almost everybody is expected to raise them except their parents (daycare, school, and the govt.). With the current rate of violence, fornication (sex without the intent to be married), and the lack of any true moral values of kids as a whole, I'm simply lost at how you think everything is OK. Actually I'm not lost, the truth is you yourself do not see the truth about yourself, otherwise you would be able to see the problems in society all around you, even Hitler understood that if you control the kids, you control the future. Point is: we are where we are today because of the past parenting choices, and as a whole spanking has been slowly disappearing, starting a few generations ago. The result is, parents like you raising today's moral standard of kids.
‘...There was just such a man when I was young – an Austrian who invented a new way of life and convinced himself that he was the chap to make it work. He tried to impose his reformation by the sword, and plunged the civilised world into misery and chaos. But the thing that this chap overlooked, my friend, was that he had a predecessor in the reformation business, called Jesus Christ. Perhaps we may assume that Jesus knew as much as the Austrian did about saving people. But the odd thing is that Jesus did not turn the disciples into storm troopers, burn down the Temple of Jerusalem, and fix the blame on Pontius Pilate. On the contrary, he made it clear that the business of philosophers was the make ideas available, and not to impose them on people.’
Originally posted by BelieveInEnoch
Yeah, as I figured, someone with one child against spanking, opposing what I said. My kids are free thinkers, they are smarter than the majority of government incorporated school raised kids, and they are raised to higher level of moral values than schools will ever teach, but thanks for your disagreement with your permission to raise them according to my convictions. Just as you have your right to do the same.
Children do not have to adapt to gay propaganda, sexual imagery, et al. It is the society that they were born into, to them it is the norm. Unless you shield them from this reality, they, children, are surprisingly tolerant of such difference.
My parents, their parents have had to adapt certainly, but to the current generation, it is not anything special or different, nothing to be feared, or looked down upon.
As I said, I look around and the kids are alright
set an example of entitlement and consumer driven greed that has shaped the current world, that has drained it of it’s natural resources
‘...There was just such a man when I was young – an Austrian who invented a new way of life and convinced himself that he was the chap to make it work. He tried to impose his reformation by the sword, and plunged the civilised world into misery and chaos. But the thing that this chap overlooked, my friend, was that he had a predecessor in the reformation business, called Jesus Christ. Perhaps we may assume that Jesus knew as much as the Austrian did about saving people. But the odd thing is that Jesus did not turn the disciples into storm troopers, burn down the Temple of Jerusalem, and fix the blame on Pontius Pilate. On the contrary, he made it clear that the business of philosophers was the make ideas available, and not to impose them on people.’
Now, believe it or not, morality is a relative thing. Relative to our time and our environment. What was right for those that penned the Bible, is not necessarily right for us today.
In an overpopulated world, with our natural resources becoming ever more depleted, I, for example, consider it morally reprehensible for someone of reasonable intelligence and education to be spewing forth children at the rate that you are seemingly do so.
Yes, I have only one child. I would have liked two, but I miscarried my second pregnancy, and upon reflection felt that one was more than enough anyway and I should be satisfied with what I had already got.
Reproduction is, afterall, a very selfish act.
I on the otherhand, have the ability to give my child 100% of my attention
I on the otherhand, have the ability to give my child 100% of my attention, and can therefore make the time to explain lifes lessons to him without having to resort to physical discipline.
And while I may be a fornicator, given the rapidity with which you seem the reproduce, you have no greater control over your carnal desires than the wee brained bunnies hopping around in the fields.
Physical punishment has been linked with a variety of psychiatric disorders in children and adults, including depression, anxiety, and drug and alcohol abuse. More recent research suggests physical punishment slows cognitive development and hampers academic achievement.