It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
. . . not even the Son knows when the timing of the Harpazo is.
Of course there is no verse in the Bible that says that, using that particular word.
Generally it is used in the New Testament to describe a bad thing, like the wolves snatching away the sheep.
Here is what I said:
A little confused here. Are you saying there isn't a verse in the NT with the word "harpazo" in it? Because that's inaccurate, there are several places that the term appears. Or are you claiming Jesus said even He doesn't know the date of His return for His bride?
There are two clauses, a main clause and then a second, dependent clause.
Of course there is no verse in the Bible that says that, using that particular word.
The second, dependent clause serves to clarify the main clause by focusing in on the main thing that excludes your sentence from being a match to any Bible verses, which is the use of that particular word, harpazo.
. . . not even the Son knows when the timing of the Harpazo is.
But if you were a person more interested in what the Bible says, over harebrained schemes, then your earlier statement is on its face a false statement if you are trying to use it as a quote from the Bible.
Which would make sense to someone who had a very narrowly matched view of what is supposed to happen that we know not the hour of.
So the only "coming" of Christ where no one would know the day nor the hour of would have to be the harpazo, His 2nd coming to rule is shared in both Daniel and Revelation, 1,260 days after the abomination of desolation.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
So the only "coming" of Christ where no one would know the day nor the hour of would have to be the harpazo, His 2nd coming to rule is shared in both Daniel and Revelation, 1,260 days after the abomination of desolation.
Which would make sense to someone who had a very narrowly matched view of what is supposed to happen that we know not the hour of.
My point being that it does not specify exactly what is supposed to happen and it is very doubtful that it extends off so far to where it becomes a concern of ours, meaning something that could happen involving us.
Most likely it is talking about the thing that is the point of the Gospel you would find a quote like that in, which is the impending doom of Jerusalem, which did happen, a long time ago.
Originally posted by rickymouse
I'm not planning on having a rapture in December. I'm going to take it easy this year just in case. I had two hernia surgeries already and don't need another
You should read what more church historians have to say than textual critics.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by NOTurTypical
You should read what more church historians have to say than textual critics.
That would be pretty boring reading textual critics more than in tiny doses, when you need to.
There is something supposedly said by Papias about someone named John being in some sort of incarceration, or something, in the time of Domitian but I don't know of any more details than that. If you have the text, feel free to share it.
There is a book out, Redating the New Testament where the author, A.T. Robinson, says that there is information we know through Tertullian and Jerome, that John was exiled in the time of Nero.
Ephesus where he died of old age in 96 AD.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by odinson
Sounds like the antichrist. In Biblical figurative language, false religions or leaders are seen as "immoral women", or sometimes people who have kept themselves from "idolatry" are symbolic of virgins. The cross would mean it's a false Christian religion.
I have no idea really, that was my first thought about your vision, I could be totally wrong though.
Apparently something you got from a YouTube video since you cite no sources in even the vaguest way.
Originally posted by odinson
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by odinson
Sounds like the antichrist. In Biblical figurative language, false religions or leaders are seen as "immoral women", or sometimes people who have kept themselves from "idolatry" are symbolic of virgins. The cross would mean it's a false Christian religion.
I have no idea really, that was my first thought about your vision, I could be totally wrong though.
Hello
That is an interesting take on it. However, when I was looking through that person's eyes, I felt full of the Holy Spirit and was quoting Bible verses fully and laying low those who we coming against her/me. I wish that I knew where she was going. It could mean that Christ is so close to coming and to arm yourself in His armor and maybe to head into the wilderness.
God Bless
Apparently something you got from a YouTube video since you cite no sources in even the vaguest way.
"We will not, however, incur the risk of pronouncing positively as to the name of Antichrist; for if it were necessary that his name should be distinctly revealed in this present time, it would have been announced by him who beheld the apocalyptic vision (John). For that (the 'apocalyptic vision') was seen no very long time since, but almost in our day, towards the end of Domitian's reign."
You can visit his tomb today in Ephesus, Turkey.