It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NowanKenubi
I wish we could get specs for that probe. Anyone has talent for digging?
Originally posted by purplemer
Maybe the rover ran the object over and made it flip.
Originally posted by yourmaker
we would have to find more of the things we are looking at, at least to prove beyond reasonable doubt, cause this isn't convincing to me at all, that out of everywhere they land on venus, they land in the one place with life? it would need to be expansive and diversified through different species.
I would think that if Venus had any life at all, it would be too small to take an image of, we'd need to send a probe with a microscopic lens, bacteria, viruses etc..
Originally posted by DJW001
Venus' atmosphere is nearly 100 times denser than Earth's, with a mean temperature over 400 degrees Celsius. The wind can gust up to 400 km/hr. That might have something to do with it. As I said:
Originally posted by AmatuerSkyWatcher
Originally posted by AmatuerSkyWatcher
Extremeophiles have been found in some of the most (in what we think) inhospitable environments, yet they thrive.
Originally posted by ALOSTSOUL
reply to post by JimOberg
Heres a picture of Venus's surface taken by the same mission there referring to the the OP.
If I remember rightly they didn't take many pictures because the camera melted.
ETA:
The Venera 9 and 10 landers had two cameras each. Only one functioned because the lens covers failed to separate from the second camera on each lander. The design was changed for Venera 11 and 12, but this change made the problem worse and all cameras failed on those missions. Venera 13 and 14 were the only landers on which all cameras worked properly; although unfortunately, the titanium lens cap on Venera 14 landed precisely on the area which was targeted by the soil compression probe.
ALS
edit on 20-1-2012 by ALOSTSOUL because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
I still think scientists have their heads up their butts when they assume that life can't exist under 'these conditions' or 'those conditions'. All they are familiar with are terran and lunar conditions, and a bit about martian conditions.
Whatever you believe - whether the universe has been here forever, or it was created by God - it is here for one thing: to support life. I personally believe that life is the RULE rather than the EXCEPTION, and I'd wager that we'll find life just about everywhere we look, once we have the technology to do so.
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
I personally believe that life is the RULE rather than the EXCEPTION, and I'd wager that we'll find life just about everywhere we look, once we have the technology to do so.