It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
Actually I have written about this a whole deal, and even in this thread i gave a small description of what and who sold what to Iraq.
My friend, EUROPEAN COUNTRIES were the majority of the people/companies who sold military equipment to Iraq, and it was GERMANY who sold the mustard gas, and such to Iraq which Saddam used to gas the Kurds, and many of his own people.
Heck France built the first nuclear weapons facility for Iraq and taught them how to make more and how to make nukes, not to mention that Saddam got his jets from France as well...
The United States unfortunately did sell SAMPLES of biological agents to Iraq to be used by Iraqi Universities to make vaccines, as well as advanced computers which Saddam used for military purposes.
The United states did sell other DUAL used equipment, such as helicopters for spraying pesticides on crops, but Saddam used people as the crops.
The other thing the U.S. sold to Saddam was intelligence to fight against the Iranians.
In the 90s the Russians became Saddam's number one suppliers of military equipment and WMD to the point that Saddam owed more money to the Russians than to anyone else...
Did the U.S. know that the DUAL use equipment and biologicals which they sold as samples were going to be used not as vaccines but to produce more biological agents? Who knows.
You do know that for example the PS3 and XBox360 are advanced computers and are also DUAL USE, which could be used for things they are not intended to be used, including for miltiary purposes?...
Are you going to go after the companies which build these game consoles because they are DUAL USE?...
edit on 18-1-2012 by ElectricUniverse because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by beezzer
I wonder how many threads on Iran we are going to see.
Probably as many as the Nirubu, is my guess.
The Iranians I know are not so enamoured as the OP is with the Iranian Regime. They fear the oppressive nature, the potential for violence on the part of their government.
Sure have seen alot of hearts and flowers lately for little ol' Iran.
As a sceptic, I don't believe even half of what my own government is telling me.
Does anyone here honestly believe the Iranians government?
Or their apologists?
My opinions are probably well known by know on the subject of iran. But I'll repeat them just to avoid any issue.
Get rid of the nuclear ambitions, you're making the rest of the world nervous.
Want to be taken seriously? Start by allowing human rights into your society.
Like equality for women and gays.
Stop with the IED's to other countries. It's annoying and it p!sses the rest of the world off.
I guess that's all for now.
Peace.
beez
In his September 21, 1992 speech to the United Nations, President George Bush announced that foreign troops, would occupy America and train for a New World Order Army. He stated:
"Nations should develop and train military units for possible U.N. peacekeeping operations. ... If multinational units are to work together, they must train together. ... Effective multinational action will also require coordinated command & control and inter-operability of both equipment and communications."
"...WE MUST CHANGE OUR NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS if we are to change our international relations. ... THE UNITED STATES IS PREPARING TO MAKE AVAILABLE OUR BASES AND FACILITIES FOR MULTI-NATION TRAINING AND FIELD EXERCISES. One such base, with facilities is Fort Dix, N.J."
President Bill Clinton has continued and expanded George Bush's surrender-America policy. As a result, increasing numbers of foreign troops, including Russian Spetsnaz, along with vast amounts of foreign military equipment are now entering the United States to serve as a U.N. OCCUPATION force.
Originally posted by marinesniper0351
I am also Iranian however half American as well, I was born and raised in the bay area, I am a US. Marine and have never visited Iran. I dont want to get into my differences with yours because they are your views and I respect them.
I will however say that all of my family that was born and raised in Iran hate their current Government. I hear over and over again about how much they miss the Kings time "The Shah", my grandfather was a General in the Military in charge of the military finance department and times were GOOD. Woman had freedom...
Iranians are pissed with their Government but unfortunately they are not armed like we are here in the US and an uprising would be brutal and probably suicidal...
I would rather the last thing I feel before getting killed to be "RECOIL" rather than on my knees or running away...
Originally posted by Rocky Black
reply to post by shansen
One must ask one self.
Why are you here.
Why do you aspire to be like us.
Why do you come here.
Why?
Because where you come from people held you down,.
You were opressed by your government.
You were left to starve and die in the streets.
So you came to the us.
We feed you .
We give you a place to live.
Then we give you a car.
A home to call your own with a 0% loan .
We help educate you.
We give you money to feed your family
We give you free helth care.
No wonder all these people are coming to the greatest country in the world.
Thats right.
You don't get that were your from do you.
You get jack.
So stop your complaining and stop trying to change this great place.
True hurts don't it.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Exsisto
Typical leftist view of things. What did the leftist POTUS do in the Iranian uprising? NOTHING! And yet he is now supporting rebels in Libya. Would you care to explain that one to me?
Oh yes, wait! I'll explain it. Iran is an ally of the Soviets even since the Soviets tried to turn Iran into a communist satellite. Even our leftist POTUS won't touch Iran till the Globalists are ready. Meanwhile he is supporting rebels in Libya. Wasn't that kind of thing called "meddling" where Iran was concerned?
What were Bill Ayers and Medea Benjamin doing in Egypt just before the uprising and overthrowing of the pro Western leader there? Oh yes, more fun meddling by LEFTIST radical communists.And radical Union leader Richard Trumpka also bragged about his involvement there.
edit on 18-1-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Exsisto
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by Exsisto
Typical leftist view of things. What did the leftist POTUS do in the Iranian uprising? NOTHING! And yet he is now supporting rebels in Libya. Would you care to explain that one to me?
Oh yes, wait! I'll explain it. Iran is an ally of the Soviets even since the Soviets tried to turn Iran into a communist satellite. Even our leftist POTUS won't touch Iran till the Globalists are ready. Meanwhile he is supporting rebels in Libya. Wasn't that kind of thing called "meddling" where Iran was concerned?
What were Bill Ayers and Medea Benjamin doing in Egypt just before the uprising and overthrowing of the pro Western leader there? Oh yes, more fun meddling by LEFTIST radical communists.And radical Union leader Richard Trumpka also bragged about his involvement there.
edit on 18-1-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
It's difficult to take you seriously when you don't even know what Communism is. Perhaps you should spend less time trawling right-wing conspiratorial websites, and more time educating yourself on geo-political systems and economics.
The quotes above were scanned directly from a now long-forgotten book entitled Prairie Fire: The Politics of Revolutionary Anti-Imperialism, which was written and published in 1974 by William Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn and other members of the Weather Underground. In this slim volume, which functioned as the Weather Underground's ideological manifesto, Ayers declares himself to be a communist, and announces that his group's bombing campaign was intended to start a violent revolution to overthrow the American government.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Why would you say I don't know what communism is? That is the stock answer by people who themselves must not know or are apologists for it.
Tell me what you think it is? I know for a fact that redistribution of wealth is part of it. Abolition of private property. All one has to do is read the Communist Manifesto. Have you done that? Do you know the abject hatred Karl Marx shows for the family? Yes abolition of the sacred family is part of communism. Hatred of the "bourgeois family" and "bourgeois capitalists". Hatred of capitalism entirely.
Uprising of the "proletariat", which Lenin himself said, the "dictatorship of the proletariat" was a necessary step in the establishment of the communist society.
So why in the world must you make such a ridiculous assumption that I have not studied this and do not understand? It can only be because you yourself don't or you are just using it to beat me down. Alinsky's Rules for Radicals ring a bell?
I have posted even the writings about the Soviet expansion of communism in Iran by presumably a Persian and you do not acknowledge that. I don't believe you know what communism is about or you were just too lazy to read the link.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Everything that happens geopolitically has to be related to the world wide conquest of communism, which today could be renamed Globalism or the New World Order.Many Bilderbergs are involved. The names may change but the end result is intended to be a One World Govt with the wealthy elites as the rulers over 7 billion people. It is completely diabolical.
Originally posted by Exsisto
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Why would you say I don't know what communism is? That is the stock answer by people who themselves must not know or are apologists for it.
Tell me what you think it is? I know for a fact that redistribution of wealth is part of it. Abolition of private property. All one has to do is read the Communist Manifesto. Have you done that? Do you know the abject hatred Karl Marx shows for the family? Yes abolition of the sacred family is part of communism. Hatred of the "bourgeois family" and "bourgeois capitalists". Hatred of capitalism entirely.
Uprising of the "proletariat", which Lenin himself said, the "dictatorship of the proletariat" was a necessary step in the establishment of the communist society.
So why in the world must you make such a ridiculous assumption that I have not studied this and do not understand? It can only be because you yourself don't or you are just using it to beat me down. Alinsky's Rules for Radicals ring a bell?
I have posted even the writings about the Soviet expansion of communism in Iran by presumably a Persian and you do not acknowledge that. I don't believe you know what communism is about or you were just too lazy to read the link.
I'm basing my opinion on your definition of Communism as written in your initial post in this thread.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Everything that happens geopolitically has to be related to the world wide conquest of communism, which today could be renamed Globalism or the New World Order.Many Bilderbergs are involved. The names may change but the end result is intended to be a One World Govt with the wealthy elites as the rulers over 7 billion people. It is completely diabolical.
That's not Communism, or even Globalism, for that matter.
I refuse to debate with someone who so clearly lacks an understanding of the topic.
And I'll add; referring me to a link at zombieland.com only strengthens my earlier advice to you (as I obviously have you pegged) ... "Perhaps you should spend less time trawling right-wing conspiratorial websites, and more time educating yourself on geo-political systems and economics."edit on 18-1-2012 by Exsisto because: (no reason given)edit on 18-1-2012 by Exsisto because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by amkia
What beheadings is this song referring to? Google has a translator
Anyways, these death chants are solely made by extremists and used for the purpose of empowering the regime. They do this through the promotion of an external enemy and by utilizing an understandable hatred amongst Iranians towards toward the west. In essence, they are baseless; practically a bluff on the regimes behalf because they know they don't stand a chance against "America"