The only authentic UFO video I have ever seen

reply to post by Rocketman7

OK twist my arm, I will tell you where the other sighting was of this same disk.

Take a look top right on this page

This scan is better:

www.disclosureproject.org...

If your film was made in 1981, that would explain the cheesy optical effects. You're right, it's not CGI, it's a simple double exposure. That's why it jutters.

reply to post by Rocketman7

post by Rocketman7
Lights in the sky swamp gas of Venus. You can do a lot to the atmosphere with lasers, masers, and that sort of thing.

Someone shows you a video that , lets be honest is better than the one you posted and all you can do is give a dismissive response .
I believe you are just playing games and making up stories , and you know full well the video you posted is fake

post by Rocketman7
Lights in the sky are lights in the sky.

And CGI is just CGI ....Enough is enough

Originally posted by Rocketman7

Originally posted by Char-Lee

Originally posted by FugitiveSoul
That's likely one of the sketchiest UFO vids I've ever seen. At the 0:10 mark, the "craft" seems to pixelate the branch it passes behind, and is it me or does the camera wobble not match the wobble movement of the UFO?

Also why did the camera man stop at the tree and not scan toward the dirrection the UFO went like I would have done...they acted like they were waiting for it to come back which is strange.

He was fumbling for the stop button on his cam corder.

Something like that. It was over and he knew it was over. There is no sound in this video but maybe there were audible clues for him when he was filming.
So he knew it was coming, and he knew it had left.

Well it looked to be moving at a slow rate and if it were me I would have continued in case it could be seen through the tree and on. In most of these cases they say there is no sound. Really if you saw this, wouldn't you be so excited you would not just STOP the camera when you come to the tree?

Originally posted by rreeves5
reply to post by FugitiveSoul

 

No, It is not just you, the wobble does not match. It is not authentic, it is a computer created video.

Well that wobble is what kept the person who leaked the video from getting hit on the head for it.
Plausibe deniability.

If you know anything at all about this subject, you can push the envelope providing at some point you discredit your evidence.

Otherwise it will not get out there.

Like I said about ants not being able to make us do anything, we can sure mess with them. We can trash their little ant farms and do all sorts of things to them and they would be clueless.

There is nothing that says that an advanced race cannot even mess with reality as we know it.

How do we know?

What do we really know about time lines and how the universe works except through our own small abilities and perceptions?
We can't travel through time. Maybe someone else can. We can't move so fast you can't see it. Maybe someone else can.
We don't have electronic equipment that can modify imagery and arrange the atoms in a polaroid shot to make a photorealistic image out of the flora and fauna.
Someone can though because Red Elk had such an image on his website for years.
If it wasn't gone now I would link to it and show you.

We can't draw huge 20 mile long images on the surface of the earth, but there are plenty of them you can see from space.

Oh but thats just a figment of our imagination.

Thats what the one ant told the other ant.

Look at this indian image and see whats on his head....
imagination?

Honestly with all the CGI effects and photoshopping people can do on their home computers now, why even bother posting videos and pictures? Do you really think people are going to believe that?

What is more believeable is when you find evidence of this kind of stuff from archeaology and the stories from the ancients because they didn't have windows photoshop or CGI. The amount of hoax material out there is unreal. Out of all the "proof" probably .005% is what was actually real.

I think it is CGI.
Movement too linear to be real world.

I'm sorry but the video you provided hasn't shown me anything new at all.

It would seem that some people like to play games and will be very serious and defensive about their video, even if it is clearly not the best one.

I think you are playing games and it really annoys me when I see these threads and unfortunately they're becoming more and more frequent.

I'm not going to stoop to name calling because it's not worth it.

Mods, where you at???

Hey look at me, I just travelled through time used the way back machine and voila...

www.imagebam.com...

Originally posted by ohiotim2112
Due to recent threads about rules and etiquette:

I have nothing nice to say about this video so I will say nothing at all..

Originally posted by SilentE
I'm sorry but the video you provided hasn't shown me anything new at all.

It would seem that some people like to play games and will be very serious and defensive about their video, even if it is clearly not the best one.

I think you are playing games and it really annoys me when I see these threads and unfortunately they're becoming more and more frequent.

I'm not going to stoop to name calling because it's not worth it.

Mods, where you at???

edit on 29-12-2011 by SilentE because: (no reason given)

Why are you calling for the mods?

This is a thread that shows a purported ufo. What were you expecting?

What are you doing here?

The video worked for me. Almost seems TOO good, ya' know...?

reply to post by Rocketman7

That one has clearly been added to the video afterwards. You can see it in the way it moves compared to camera.

Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
Honestly with all the CGI effects and photoshopping people can do on their home computers now, why even bother posting videos and pictures? Do you really think people are going to believe that?

What is more believeable is when you find evidence of this kind of stuff from archeaology and the stories from the ancients because they didn't have windows photoshop or CGI. The amount of hoax material out there is unreal. Out of all the "proof" probably .005% is what was actually real.

Well part of the credibility of this video is that it is 10 years old. Prior to really good graphics that could be done on a home pc and if you can see it under good conditions, proper codec, proper player, it shows detail that cannot be faked using the best programs available.

As a for instance examine the disk just as it approaches the trees and you can see the effect it has on the air.

Now in this youtube copy you cannot see it as well as the copy I uploaded to megaupload - the enlarged AVI, and you need to use a quality player like Cyberlink PowerDVD to see it clearly.

But you can see air currents, just like heat coming off a highway type of air currents.

Well sorry but you can't do that with CGI and make it look realistic.

reply to post by gortex

Someone shows you a video that , lets be honest is better than the one you posted and all you can do is give a dismissive response

I am now convinced he is just trying to mess with our heads. He is now on ignore.

I have personally witnessed 2 unexplained UAP phenomena and no one can convince me that what I saw was human concocted devices, at least not from this era, maybe time travelers but I think otherwise. Also, they were witnessed in the tropics near the jungle re-enforcing the theory of otherworld/dimensional entities.

That...does not...look real...at all.

In fact,its probably one of the most,unconvincing and unimpressive UFO video's i have ever seen.

Authentic my backside,good luck spaceman.

Cheers

Looks like photo shop to me. I love how ufo's seem to change with our under standing of what they should look like.

Originally posted by Rocketman7
Why are you calling for the mods?

This is a thread that shows a purported ufo. What were you expecting?

What are you doing here?

edit on 29-12-2011 by Rocketman7 because: typo

What am I doing here?

What are you doing here????

I'm here for knowledge, for fun, for truth?...

I'm calling mods because i'm sick of these 'proof' video's that find there way here that show nothing significant at all.

edit on 29-12-2011 by SilentE because: (no reason given)