It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bluemooone2
reply to post by Rocketman7
I would really appreciate the effort here. I know of one other video that was so high deff and breathtaking It was immediately said to be CGI and a very obscure videographer claimed credit for it although , as far as I can tell all he ever filmed was African wildlife, no CGI work at all really. Since then all copy's of the high deff version of that video have also been disappeared.
Anyway I would really be glad if you can find the codec.
Originally posted by Violence
Sorry this just isn't helping your case.
How did the "plasma" magically disappear? Since you're apparently more of an expert on video's etc..
The "UFO" looks so 2 dimensional.
The video could have plasma, it could have fire shooting out of the dome, it could be setting the trees on fire for all I care, you just haven't submitted anything decent that would make myself and I'm sure other people believe this is a real E.T spacecraft.edit on 29-12-2011 by Violence because: (no reason given)
post by Rocketman7
The only authentic UFO video I have ever seen
In all my years of studying UFOlogy, and as a graphics expert, and with a great deal of knowledge of camera work, and lighting, and physics, this is the only video that has ever passed my test.
Originally posted by Rocketman7
Originally posted by sweetnlow
Its CGI
no really it is
CGI was developed by programmers over a long period of time. I am one of those programmers who developed CGI.
Originally posted by Rocketman7
In all my years of studying UFOlogy, and as a graphics expert, and with a great deal of knowledge of camera work, and lighting, and physics, this is the only video that has ever passed my test.
When I first discovered the video in Kazaa, where it was leaked years ago, it was quite high def.
But even so when you examine the video frame by frame, you can find that one or two frames in the video were out of sequence. The video was edited, and those frames reversed to allow for plausible deniability.
The actual imagery was not tampered with, just a few frames reversed in sequence.
The plasma in the original was very clear, and at the time, it was not possible to do plasma as a special effect and I am not sure it can be done now even as well as it appeared in the original of this video.
At any rate take a look, it is all over the net now so you have probably seen it before.
Its a good litmus test for fake UFO websites.
If they have UFO videos and do not have this video? That website is probably disinfo.
There was a massive effort to discredit this video when it was leaked on Kazaa.
The net was flooded with similar fakes and it was very difficult to find it on-line for several years.
Google Video Link
So google video will not work for me?
Link then
video.google.com...edit on 28-12-2011 by Rocketman7 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Violence
reply to post by Rocketman7
Just stating facts on the type of person you have shown yourself to be in other threads
Making observations, something you can't do with this video.
In regards to your last attempt at cleaning up the video, you can put sprinkles on dog crap, when you serve it up, it's still dog crap.
Originally posted by MysticPearl
Originally posted by Rocketman7
In all my years of studying UFOlogy, and as a graphics expert, and with a great deal of knowledge of camera work, and lighting, and physics, this is the only video that has ever passed my test.
When I first discovered the video in Kazaa, where it was leaked years ago, it was quite high def.
But even so when you examine the video frame by frame, you can find that one or two frames in the video were out of sequence. The video was edited, and those frames reversed to allow for plausible deniability.
The actual imagery was not tampered with, just a few frames reversed in sequence.
The plasma in the original was very clear, and at the time, it was not possible to do plasma as a special effect and I am not sure it can be done now even as well as it appeared in the original of this video.
At any rate take a look, it is all over the net now so you have probably seen it before.
Its a good litmus test for fake UFO websites.
If they have UFO videos and do not have this video? That website is probably disinfo.
There was a massive effort to discredit this video when it was leaked on Kazaa.
The net was flooded with similar fakes and it was very difficult to find it on-line for several years.
Google Video Link
So google video will not work for me?
Link then
video.google.com...edit on 28-12-2011 by Rocketman7 because: (no reason given)
Well, you suck at researching ufology.
Shouldn't have to tell a so called "ufologist" this, but there's video of numerous ufo's stationed right over the White House in July, 1953, on two separate occasions. President Truman talked about it, and fighter pilots were sent after them, to no avail.
It's laughable you don't know about that incident, especially since I posted a thread on it.
Originally posted by Rocketman7
this is the only video that has ever passed my test.
Originally posted by Rocketman7
Originally posted by sweetnlow
Its CGI
no really it is
CGI was developed by programmers over a long period of time. I am one of those programmers who developed CGI.