The only authentic UFO video I have ever seen

In all my years of studying UFOlogy, and as a graphics expert, and with a great deal of knowledge of camera work, and lighting, and physics, this is the only video that has ever passed my test.
When I first discovered the video in Kazaa, where it was leaked years ago, it was quite high def.

But even so when you examine the video frame by frame, you can find that one or two frames in the video were out of sequence. The video was edited, and those frames reversed to allow for plausible deniability.

The actual imagery was not tampered with, just a few frames reversed in sequence.

The plasma in the original was very clear, and at the time, it was not possible to do plasma as a special effect and I am not sure it can be done now even as well as it appeared in the original of this video.

At any rate take a look, it is all over the net now so you have probably seen it before.
Its a good litmus test for fake UFO websites.

If they have UFO videos and do not have this video? That website is probably disinfo.

There was a massive effort to discredit this video when it was leaked on Kazaa.

The net was flooded with similar fakes and it was very difficult to find it on-line for several years.

Google Video Link

So google video will not work for me?

Link then
video.google.com...

You video seems to be a blank.

Originally posted by MrUncreated
You video seems to be a blank.

Maybe that's the message, no authentic UFO's he has seen?

Originally posted by MrUncreated
You video seems to be a blank.

For some reason google video will not comply.

Do me a favor and use the link I provided and post the video in this thread using google vid linking option vid:google as I have tried.

That's likely one of the sketchiest UFO vids I've ever seen. At the 0:10 mark, the "craft" seems to pixelate the branch it passes behind, and is it me or does the camera wobble not match the wobble movement of the UFO?

Sorry,

this video doesn't convince me in the SLIGHTEST.

It looks like a cheap editing trick, the UFO appears to be moving like on a another layer or as if someone used a cheap trick using mirrors etc.....there is just something off about it. Also...at approx 6 secs...you can see the UFO shaking in a suspicious way...which makes it even more plausible that some mirror/camera trick was used to "copy" the UFO in the footage.

Also..the camera is not consistent with the UFO...at the end when the UFO vanishes..why wouldnt he just look for the UFO...instead of simply holding the camera steady at one point even if the UFO disappeared to the left?

(Like he pre-shot the first footage, if you know what i mean)

I'm sorry but why do ufos pose for video cameras for 5 seconds then just drift off without the camera chasing where its headed...just doesn't make sense

Unfortunately this is a fake video. The pixelation is wrong on the UFO- its has much smaller pixels then the rest of the video. Some may argue that this is because its further away but that's totally incorrect. Not only can you see a perfect square of smaller pixels surrounding the supposed "UFO"

sorry, and I really hate to say it out loud, but it feels CGI in the tween of the animation/movement.
(after it pauses, it doesn't stay in sync with the background so to speak)

This worked well for me:

video.google.com...#


OP....

any more info and where it was taken and when?

Due to recent threads about rules and etiquette:

I have nothing nice to say about this video so I will say nothing at all..

You know, I have no proof that this is fake. No real skills at video analysis. But at first blush from an untrained eye, when it looks too good to true it's probably because it is.

Originally posted by FugitiveSoul
That's likely one of the sketchiest UFO vids I've ever seen. At the 0:10 mark, the "craft" seems to pixelate the branch it passes behind, and is it me or does the camera wobble not match the wobble movement of the UFO?

What you are seeing is a washed out version of the original video.

CHances are you will see a million copies of this washed out version and not a single original as it was
leaked on Kazaa years ago.

In the original it was color, and under the craft you could clearly see plasma. Like lightning type plasma.

With very fine detail. Something even Star Wars couldn't reproduce with Industrial Light and Magic.

reply to post by Rocketman7


I was not as impressed by this as you are, because of what I believe to be very clear digital manipulation.

Where the "ufo" exits frame:
The sky and trees have been separated on the right side.
The "ufo" then placed behind the trees but in front of the clean withe background or sky.
This is very easy to manipulate if you have a clean color background to any foreground.
Notice also the beginning of the video:
The maker did not risk trying to fake the beginning the same way.
The reason being, the sky has clouds that have to move with the trees.
His skill level was low.

Freeze frame and zoom in on the "ufo" when it's half behind the trees.
What you should be able to spot is a clear white outline surrounding the branches of the tree and the "ufo" falling behind the white.
This is due to bad isolation of pixels. The sky is actually still on the tree.

Later
covermind

reply to post by ElOmen

I'm sorry but why do ufos pose for video cameras for 5 seconds then just drift off without the camera chasing where its headed...just doesn't make sense

Agreed, I would be trying to run around them trees and watch it for as long as possible.

hmm thanks for posting another interesting video, but imho this looks very much staged

reason:

if you put your camera on an object like this and you move your camera along with the object, you would overshoot its movement when it stops, or be in a natural way inacurate in pointing.

i mean

if you are calm enough not to shake it like mad, the cams movement would show a dynamic motion. But with this one it looks kind of odd. The movement does at some point not fit from what i would expect the background and the object would move.

Originally posted by covermind
reply to post by Rocketman7

 

I was not as impressed by this as you are, because of what I believe to be very clear digital manipulation.

Where the "ufo" exits frame:
The sky and trees have been separated on the right side.
The "ufo" then placed behind the trees but in front of the clean withe background or sky.
This is very easy to manipulate if you have a clean color background to any foreground.
Notice also the beginning of the video:
The maker did not risk trying to fake the beginning the same way.
The reason being, the sky has clouds that have to move with the trees.
His skill level was low.

Freeze frame and zoom in on the "ufo" when it's half behind the trees.
What you should be able to spot is a clear white outline surrounding the branches of the tree and the "ufo" falling behind the white.
This is due to bad isolation of pixels. The sky is actually still on the tree.

Later
covermind

Well lets not jump to conclusions until some real ufologist in this group, if there is a single one,
reaches into their private archives, and posts the original as leaked in Kazaa years ago.

If that doesn't happen, my friends, its all a moot point.

Oh I have it somewhere. Am I the only one???

Well, it aint bad, but I'll say that I've seen Billy Meiers footage that was better. No, there's nothing in this video that would convince me it's any more "real" than Billy Meiers. In fact, I see this video as sort of a tribute to Billy Meiers. It needs a LOT of provenance before you can say anything else about it.

And, BTW, admitting that you're a "graphics expert" AND a UFO enthusiast is a big red flag.

Sorry, guy: You picked a REALLY tough audience. Any video that falls short of absolutely perfect is gonna be torn apart. Which I guess includes all of them, so far.

On the other hand, if you truly have reason to still believe in it--well, it's probably best to say no more about it....

Originally posted by ZeskoWhirligan
Well, it aint bad, but I'll say that I've seen Billy Meiers footage that was better. No, there's nothing in this video that would convince me it's any more "real" than Billy Meiers. In fact, I see this video as sort of a tribute to Billy Meiers. It needs a LOT of provenance before you can say anything else about it.

And, BTW, admitting that you're a "graphics expert" AND a UFO enthusiast is a big red flag.

What if you are a graphics expert and a UFO enthusiast?

Ok I'm a plumber from Wisconsin. How's that?