It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Quake Watch 2012

page: 40
159
<< 37  38  39    41  42  43 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:11 AM
link   
Japan is about to get something big check out the activity

www.ustream.tv...

very disturbing activity


Was watching this for about 10 minutes and notice a pressure buildup occurring usually shown as pattern vibrations that shows up like a Christmas tree. Example: vibration then silence then more stronger vibration than silence.
It this this 4 times followed by a long continuous vibration. And the give away is the pattern of quiet between each event.
edit on 4/5/2011 by dreamfox1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:34 AM
link   
Yeah it seems to keep getting real intense. It was a sound jab drawn out beep sort of sound earlier. I didn't know about this stream before, it sounds so cool.



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 02:10 AM
link   
Really getting intense right now. Activity is now spiking

www.ustream.tv...
edit on 4/5/2011 by dreamfox1 because: danger



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 02:23 AM
link   
reply to post by PuterMan
 

Nice to see that Plate Tectonic was mention here. As I posted some time back, this is the things we was working with here in a computer simulation, but it was based on the "common" info regarding how much the plates moved and in what direction. Nothing fits. Combining the sea floor spreading theory with continental drift and information on global seismicity, as they do use today, makes everything wrong because the "official" figures of spreading/subduction do not add up.



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 02:32 AM
link   
reply to post by Aromaz
 


And

reply to post by PuterMan
 


See the following document:

Testing an astronomically-based decadal-scale empirical harmonic climate model versus the IPCC (2007) general circulation climate models


The proposed model assumes that the climate is resonating with, or synchronized to a set of natural harmonics that have been associated to the solar system planetary motion, mostly determined by Jupiter and Saturn. We show that the GCMs fail to reproduce the major decadal and multidecadal oscillations found in the global surface temperature record from 1850 to 2011. On the contrary, the proposed harmonic model is found to well reconstruct the observed climate oscillations from 1850 to 2011, and it is able to forecast the climate oscillations from 1950 to 2011 using the data covering the period 1850-1950, and vice versa. The 9.1-year cycle is shown to be likely related to a decadal Soli/Lunar tidal oscillation, while the 10-10.5, 20-21 and 60-62 year cycles are synchronous to solar and heliospheric planetary oscillations.


There are lots pf charts and graphs in the paper showing how the relationship between the angles of Jupiter and Saturn to each other affect the global climate.


The major hpothesized mechanism is that the planets, in particular Jupiter and Saturn, induce solar or heliospheric oscillations that induce equivalent oscillations in the electromagnetic properties of the upper atmosphere. The latter induces similar cycles in the cloud cover and in the terrestrial albedo forcing the climate to oscillate in the same way. The soli/lunar tidal cyclical dynamics also appears to play an important role in climate change at specific frequencies.


They have backcasted what the temperatures should be with their model and it shows an amazing degree of congruence with the ice core records for the studied time period.



The red line is the recorded data, the solid black line is the results of the hypothesized model, and then there are the various IPCC (Anthropogenic Global Warming) projections.

While not earthquake related directly, the paper does speak to the topic of other planets and the sun having a greater affect upon our world than is generally considered.



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 04:02 AM
link   

Originally posted by ericblair4891
About two weeks ago, Northern Italy was active. The Swiss quake was probably influenced by Italy moving.
Could be, the entire region is very limited in scope


TextMagnitude ML 3.3 Region NORTHERN ITALY Date time 2012-02-12 07:48:21.0 UTC Location 44.13 N ; 12.38 E Depth 30 km Distances 17 km NW Rimini (pop 135,953 ; local time 08:48:21.0 2012-02-12) 4 km NW Savignano sul rubicone (pop 16,231 ; local time 08:48:21.0 2012-02-12) 2 km NW Gatteo (pop 7,375 ; local time 08:48:21.0 2012-02-12)
source(www.emsc-csem.org...



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 09:33 AM
link   
perhaps the aziatic plate is playing up.... regarding the many EQ/s at turkey/greece/and siberia...aswell?



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 01:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by angelchemuel
reply to post by Hellas
 

When was Switzerlands last 'significant' eq? Anyone know?

Rainbows
Jane


depends what you mean by significant



8.5
Date/Time: 1855/7/25 12:0: UTC
Lat: 46.1 Long: 7.2
Location: Switzerland:Haut-Valais
Magnitude: 8.5 Unk
Depth: - km
Source: Ganse and Nelson (1981, 1982), Raid and Myers (1985)

MWEQ 314-2011

there have may have been 7's since (but not since 1910 anyway)



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 02:49 PM
link   
Riots and earthquakes.


Magnitude mb 4.3 Region DODECANESE ISLANDS, GREECE Date time 2012-02-12 19:17:34.0 UTC Location 36.91 N ; 27.46 E Depth 12 km Distances 111 km S Aydin (pop 163,022 ; local time 21:17:34.2 2012-02-12) 15 km S Bodrum (pop 39,317 ; local time 21:17:34.2 2012-02-12)
source(www.emsc-csem.org...



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 03:15 PM
link   
reply to post by diamondsmith
 



Hey y'all . . . Muzzy, Puterman and Diamondsmith

Do you notice here:

earthquake.usgs.gov...

The virtual line of 5.X quakes from

Magnitude 5.1 - MINAHASA, SULAWESI, INDONESIA

Clear over and down toward Tonga?

I suspect all you experts will note that there's no possible correlation between those quakes etc. etc. yadda yadda yadda.

Guess I'm not buying it. Just doesn't look that way to this layman.

Is there any precedent for such a line and NOTHING of significance following afterwards?

Might should go on South a bit and include in that line this one:

Magnitude 5.3 - KERMADEC ISLANDS, NEW ZEALAND

earthquake.usgs.gov...

Therefore what, I don't have a clue.

It just kind of jumped out at me as not all that common, somehow.

Is it INCONCEIVABLE

that along that whole long line might be a much bigger quake in the not distant future?

IIRC, Bandah Ache was not that long a . . . what was it . . . a fault slip?

Is there a handy map available showing the known faults near that line of quakes?



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 03:51 PM
link   
reply to post by BO XIAN
 



IIRC, Bandah Ache was not that long a . . . what was it . . . a fault slip?

The Cause: moving geological plates The Indo-Australian plate moves below the Eurasian plate at around 70 mm per year on average. Plates get locked and move very little for many years, even centuries, pressure builds up - and is then suddenly and catastrophically released in the form of a major earthquake. This happened on 26th December 2004 below Sumatra on the fault line between the Indo-Australian and the Eurasian plates.
source(www.andaman.org...




Plate tectonics -www.andaman.org..." target='_blank' class='tabOff'/>


Plate tectonics behind the 2004 earthquake-www.andaman.org..." target='_blank' class='tabOff'/>

Tonga plate-
www1.gly.bris.ac.uk..." target='_blank' class='tabOff'/>

I don't think they could be related in a way.



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 04:02 PM
link   
reply to post by diamondsmith
 



Thanks greatly for your kind links and skilled and experienced perspective.

Certainly given the fault lines . . . and the distances . . . one could readily conclude the line of quakes was merely

coincidence.

Yet, it sure LOOKS . . . at least interesting . . .

So much for being a layman. LOL

Appreciate your thoughtfulness.



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 07:37 PM
link   
Now that's a strange location....



Magnitude mb 5.0
Region MOZAMBIQUE
Date time 2012-02-13 00:49:31.0 UTC
Location 13.93 S ; 40.93 E
Depth 11 km
Distances 75 km N Nacala (pop 224,795 ; local time 02:49:31.7 2012-02-13)
125 km N Moçambique (pop 54,315 ; local time 02:49:31.7 2012-02-13)


EMSC



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 07:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hellas
Now that's a strange location....



Magnitude mb 5.0
Region MOZAMBIQUE
Date time 2012-02-13 00:49:31.0 UTC
Location 13.93 S ; 40.93 E
Depth 11 km
Distances 75 km N Nacala (pop 224,795 ; local time 02:49:31.7 2012-02-13)
125 km N Moçambique (pop 54,315 ; local time 02:49:31.7 2012-02-13)

EMSC


I thought that was strange also,can you pull up the history of that location?



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 08:01 PM
link   
reply to post by BO XIAN
 


yeah, you would think they are all related to the same thing wouldn't you, ie expansion of the Australian Plate.

then out of left field .................... Mozambique



edit on 12-2-2012 by muzzy because:to add this .......

I hadn't looked at this page for a while, looks like they have taken it past the Beta version and this is going to be the style. I like it
About time!

USGS Latest Earthquakes - Mapping
edit on 12-2-2012 by muzzy because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 08:02 PM
link   
Anymore info anywhere about the Swiss eq anyone?
Just curious.
Rainbows
Jane



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 08:12 PM
link   



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 08:19 PM
link   
I guess the Mozambique quake is not so odd after all.

Earthquake Hazard Map.


This from the 7.5 in 2006.


A powerful earthquake measuring 7.5 on the Richter Scale struck Mozambique and Zimbabwe just past midnight. The quake's centre was in Manica Province and news reports say that two people were killed and more than a dozen injured. Earthquakes in Southern Africa are recorded by the Seismology Unit of the South African Council for Geoscience in Gauteng; the unit has seismic a history for South Africa since 1620. As this seismic hazard map for Africa shows, it's not an area that often gets quakes, so it's not surprised people were panicked.


africanhistory.about.com...
edit on 12-2-2012 by kdog1982 because: (no reason given)



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 08:33 PM
link   
reply to post by kdog1982
 


I remember that one like it was yesterday



Date/Time: 2006/2/22 22:19:7.8
Lat: -21.324 Long: 33.583
Region: NW of Mabote, Mozambique
Mw: 7.0 Ms: 7.5
Mb: 6.5 ML: n/a
Depth: 11 km
Deaths: 4 , Injuries: 36
Tsunami: n/a
Source: noaa
One person killed at Espungabera, one killed at Machaze and 2 killed at Beira. Thirty-six people injured and at least 294 buildings damaged in the Espungabera-Beira-Chimoio area. Power outages occurred at Maputo. Felt (V) at Beira, Inhambane and Maputo; (IV) at Matola. Felt (IV) at Harare and Mutare, Zimbabwe. Also felt (IV) at Louis Trichardt and Phalaborwa; (III) at Durban and Middelburg; (II) at Johannesburg and Pretoria, South Africa. Felt throughout Mozambique and eastern Zimbabwe. Felt in Swaziland and at Lobatse, Botswana and Lusaka, Zambia.


Interesting how neither Africa or Australia has had a Mag 8 (since 314 AD anyway) That Mag 8 map again

there must have been some biguns in the Rift Valley thousands of years ago though



posted on Feb, 12 2012 @ 08:43 PM
link   
reply to post by muzzy
 


Yea,I saw your map.
Something must be on the move that hasn't happened in a long time.




top topics



 
159
<< 37  38  39    41  42  43 >>

log in

join