It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
I just wanted to thank everybody whop has contributed to a great discussion so far. Thanks for all the links and input.
Now, Pakistan is basically split between two opposing worlds really. There are those in Pakistan [Mostly modern urban city/town dwellers] who would like to have closer ties with the West and outside world vs those who are [Mostly rural dwellers] the majority of whom are of a stricter Islamic belief.
this is where I (just saying) would add Russia, for they have a stake in this too, Pakistan nuke falls in the wrong hands... Moscow gets mushroom cloud.
So if any Extremist groups were able to gain control over some of Pakistan's Nuclear stockpile it would not just be a threat the US/West but potentially also China. There is common ground here which both sides need to set aside their differences and deal with Pakistan's lack of willingness to go after those who are fermenting the problems within their borders and get on the ball which would also help with the ongoing conflict in Afghanistan
The US/West and China have common ground here....
Originally posted by Vitchilo
That's not what I read. From what I've seen from Pakistani polls, most Pakistanis want to cut off relations with America and become a full ally with China.
But yeah you're totally right, China is a fool to trust Pakistan. The ISI has been training, funding, giving intelligence to dozens of terrorists groups for decades. The ISI thinks it's a valuable asset ``against Pakistani enemies (India, America, etc)... they had quit a little in the last few years but since the ``Bin Laden`` raid, a lot of ISI went even more rogue and started give even more support to those groups.
I appreciate the participation.
Do we have a link of said poll? I'd like to check it out..
So in your opinion do you think China will be able to wrestle this beast of a situation to the ground unlike the West?
Originally posted by Vitchilo
reply to post by SLAYER69
I appreciate the participation.
Do we have a link of said poll? I'd like to check it out..
That was a few months ago I read that... don't remember where. Sorry.
.................Less Support for U.S. Involvement
America’s overall image remains negative in Pakistan. Along with Turks and Egyptians,
Pakistanis give the U.S. its lowest ratings among the 22 nations included in the spring 2010 Pew
Global Attitudes survey – in all three countries, only 17% have a favorable view of the U.S.
Roughly six-in-ten (59%) Pakistanis describe the U.S. as an enemy, while just 11% say it is a
partner. And President Barack Obama is unpopular – only 8% of Pakistanis express confidence
that he will do the right thing in world affairs, his lowest rating among the 22 nations.
Moreover, support for U.S. involvement in the fight against extremists has waned over
the last year. Fewer Pakistanis now want the U.S. to provide financial and humanitarian aid to
areas where extremist groups operate, or for the U.S. to provide intelligence and logistical
support to Pakistani troops fighting extremists, although about half of those surveyed still favor
these efforts. There is also little support for U.S. drone strikes against extremist leaders – those
who are aware of these attacks generally say they are not necessary, and overwhelmingly they
believe the strikes kill too many civilians.
The U.S.-led war in neighboring Afghanistan is widely opposed by Pakistanis. Nearly
two-thirds (65%) want U.S. and NATO troops removed as soon as possible. And relatively few
Pakistanis believe the situation in Afghanistan could have a serious impact on their country: 25%
think it would be bad for Pakistan if the Taliban regained control of Afghanistan and 18% say it
would be good; 27% think it would not matter and 30% have no opinion..................
Originally posted by OldCorp
Excellent thread Slayer.
I don't trust Musharraf either. He's a smarmy little bastard that was double dealing the entire time he was in office. The ISI has always supported the Taliban and never stopped, despite Bush's threat, "You either with us or with the terrorists." He paid lip service to the US while pocketing our money and letting the ISI pee on our legs.
The Chinese threat that an attack on Pakistan is an attack on China is fairly worrisome though. Seems like lately the commies - Russian and Chinese both - are growing some balls. They may very well get neutered if they keep it up.edit on 11/25/2011 by OldCorp because: (no reason given)
Pakistan stops NATO supplies after raid kills 28
(Reuters) - NATO helicopters attacked a military checkpoint in northwest Pakistan on Saturday, killing up to 28 troops and prompting Pakistan to shut vital supply routes for NATO troops fighting in Afghanistan, Pakistani officials said.
The attack is the worst single incident of its kind since Pakistan uneasily allied itself with Washington in the days immediately following the Sept 11, 2001 attacks on U.S. targets.
Wen warns US on South China Sea dispute
China has warned "external forces" not to get involved in its maritime disputes with neighbouring countries over the South China Sea.
In comments apparently directed at the US, Premier Wen Jiabao said that the disputes should be resolved by "relevant sovereign states".
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
I came across this while checking the morning news:
Pakistan stops NATO supplies after raid kills 28
(Reuters) - NATO helicopters attacked a military checkpoint in northwest Pakistan on Saturday, killing up to 28 troops and prompting Pakistan to shut vital supply routes for NATO troops fighting in Afghanistan, Pakistani officials said.
The attack is the worst single incident of its kind since Pakistan uneasily allied itself with Washington in the days immediately following the Sept 11, 2001 attacks on U.S. targets.
Originally posted by neo96
Seems to me if there was going to be a "false flag" against Pakistan already would have happened when we went after Bin Laden.
No action will be taken agianst China because we buy and borrow their junk for some reason people love being "The boy who cried wolf" that's not to say something is going to happened within the next 10 to 20 years US and China will be at war or have a "limited" conflict.
The best scenario would be a new "Cold War" with China but that will never happen as long as our economies are tied together.