It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

ALL MEMBERS READ:Increased Scrutiny for Aliens & UFO Forum

page: 9
137
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 24 2011 @ 04:04 AM
link   
I just finished reading the whole thread and I would like to add:

On the subject of ET's, there are research documentaries or interviews which lack scrutiny. So I'm pretty lenient if others don't use scrutiny.

The only really prevalent issue to bring up: the "aliens" which are discussed on the forum.

I feel more realistically discussed aliens are discussed less, such as potential extremophiles in our Solar System. More often aliens who are part of conspiracy theories are discussed.

I don't mind and I do enjoy reading outside the box thinking on ETI's because well they kinda haven't been discovered yet, so I think it's ok to brainstorm logically.

I do think there are some good threads that re-surface to the top consistently so that is a positive.

Where are the 2 threads on the White House Response to visiting ET's? Those didn't stick around too long either. The thread on today's BBC article has barely any posts in it as of now.

There are good subjects that appear in the forum but don't resurface.

If more strong threads continued to resurface we probably wouldn't have an issue.

edit on 24-11-2011 by game over man because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 26 2011 @ 03:10 AM
link   
A Note About Baiting, And Threads Based On Baiting

Members who choose to make this their vocation are going to be out of a job.



posted on Nov, 29 2011 @ 04:11 PM
link   
The idiotic posts such as "swamp gas", "chinese lanterns", "weather balloons", and other such infantile comments are alive and well. All one needs to do is to look at the first page of this recent thread:

www.abovetopsecret.com...




posted on Dec, 1 2011 @ 01:08 PM
link   
Your action and policy is very appreciated, ATS staffs. It makes this forum a civil one. I admitted that I stopped posting threads on this for a while because I couldn't tolerate the rude sayers, ridicule, and insults. It 's so uncivlised. And it's the reason why I quit that website. And I have found this. The civil one that we can discuss in peace. Thank you that you are stepping up.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 12:44 AM
link   
reply to post by Helmkat
 
i must agree oops i made a silly post on the UFO site no debunking of genuine posts . i have personally seen things through my reflector telescope . that are unexplained apart from that in 1968 myself and my older brother watched one hovering bright blue for one hour then it just shot off it wASin Scotland and it was snowing heavily .NOTthe moon as it was out of phase at the time once again apologies to any member i may have inadvertently upset MERRY CHRISTMAS



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 03:10 AM
link   
reply to post by tothetenthpower
 


It is evident and well documented that any blog,chat room or discussion group needs to be monitored. With out this sooner or later someone will inheriently become a pest at the least. Good job and keep it up.



posted on Jan, 16 2012 @ 04:37 PM
link   
Thank you for your efforts in maintain all the chat rooms



posted on Jan, 18 2012 @ 01:48 AM
link   
Hi Friends,

Glad to see ATS staffers noticing this and taking action. I've personally been apprehensive towards posting any new threads for the fear of ridicule and rude remarks from skeptics. I love to watch videos related to UFO at my cable tv online and want to share my views with you guys



posted on Jan, 18 2012 @ 02:12 AM
link   
I hope you stick with these guidelines

It has been said before , & yet we still face ridicule when we post



posted on Jan, 24 2012 @ 02:03 PM
link   
I haven't had the oportunity to see a UFO but know people who tell me they have. They don't like to tell others because they feel they would be deemed crazy by people. These people I know that have seen them are about as sane as anyone else I know.

My question is why do these UFO occupants have to be alien? In the millions of years that this earth has supported life here isn't it possible that a race of beings got advanced enough to create spaceships and to cloak an island here on earth?

Look how much our technology has evolved in the last 50 years and in the 100 years before that. We are getting close to possessing technology to cloak items from sight and all radar technologies we have created. Why couldn't another civilization have evolved sooner that could have vastly exceeded our knowledge and perception. If we wouldn't have had all the plagues and wars in the past and limited vision of things we may have evolved into great beings long ago. Maybe the Aliens are not really aliens at all but residents of this planet that have great knowledge and understanding. We are not a very observent race. They put up buildings right on our way to work and we don't even notice till 6 months later. I know if I was advanced way beyond the humans of this world I would not intermingle with people or give them any technology they could use against me or my kind. I would not give them the rope to hang themselves either. Would these beings look like us? Maybe. They could be the nicest people you know and not wish to get involved with our screwed up societies filled with greed, pride, and desire for power. They could live next door.

Is this possible... yes... is it probable.... no not really. Is it really possible humans are not the most intelligent beings on this planet? Maybe some squirrels are flying these UFOs. Maybe they are fueled by nuts.
edit on 24-1-2012 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 05:46 PM
link   
Agreed.
How about also applying the same to all the other forums also (excluding SKUNKWORKS)
There seriously needs to be some moderation especially in religion and current events.
And can we PLEASE finally have posting nothing but bible quotes in threads OUTSIDE religion,
to be considered as spamming or "off topic"?



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 05:52 PM
link   
reply to post by LionOfGOD
 


Problem is we have thousands of members and only a staff of less than 100, it's though for us to be everywhere at once.

That's why we rely on the membership, to alert these posts so that we may keep things in line with the T&C.

~Tenth



posted on Mar, 19 2012 @ 04:57 AM
link   
 




 



posted on Mar, 19 2012 @ 02:29 PM
link   
reply to post by Tripple_Helix
 
I agree 100%. endless been there, done that...'case closed' with a link provided. It is killing so much of the updated info that needs to be in the global conversation. Especially the NASA UFO studies.



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 09:16 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Mar, 31 2012 @ 09:18 PM
link   
 




 



posted on Apr, 2 2012 @ 12:46 PM
link   
This site has a brony admin?
I would like to be banned please.



posted on Apr, 23 2012 @ 05:11 PM
link   
reply to post by Blue Shift
 
After studying many UFO cases one can come to the conclusion that the White House has disclosed what it knows about the UFO subject, nothing. However, not all past presidents can say this honestly.

Think of this... Why would any person, or persons that are privileged to the knowledge as to what these unknown anomalies are ever tell an elected official any information, when that particular president has no power over that data, and has no reason to know...

Data is protected by sub-compartmentalizing. Proven fully from the military, and private sector contractors that control who is told what, and more importantly, why do they need to know. This application of thought has worked very well with new technologies, and logically would be deployed on any foreign technological advancement of this earth, or from somewhere else.



posted on Apr, 24 2012 @ 09:09 PM
link   
Had I higher access, I'd post a chapter from my unpublished (and probably never to be published while I'm still alive) book... But it's rather "blunt and honest" and I know from decades of online experience how moderators can go off the deep end and dissect bits. And while it starts off on UFOs it eventually wobbles all over the Unknown field pulling in all manner of topics. And I Know how moderators love to pigeonhole certain threads and topics, pinning them down to only Certain subs and the like...



posted on Apr, 24 2012 @ 09:15 PM
link   
Maybe the mods should not allow every thread to be published 'a friend of my brothers cousin's girlfriend told me she was beamed aboard a purple pickle' seriously not to be a hater but some of these threads deserve to be ridiculed. If that makes me a Bad member so be it, provide some type of evidence!!



new topics

top topics



 
137
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join