We really ARE alone ("Aliens" are not "E.T's" they are "E.D's")

Originally posted by mysterioustranger
reply to post by thegagefather

 

Well, one day we'll all see if its true or not, right? And the Bible and Quran too.

Thanks so much. Glad we all agree. The Bible is no proof. And this from a Christian yet. Go figure!

'Must be one of those fallen angels...wait...DEMON...no, wait! Im just a FEMA 1st Responder. Same thing.

Tidings of comfort and joy to you as well. See you in class.

If only they could all be like you. Maybe we'll see one day, maybe not. My money is on the latter, but I don't know everything so I could be direly wrong. Clearly the OP doesn't agree, though.

reply to post by Tripple_Helix


Thank you.. I didnt get a chance to type all of that, but you did it for me.

As per my question.. and your response, we have PROOF and EVIDENCE that earth is much older then 6,000 years old.. please disproove it for me.

Originally posted by tbonedude
reply to post by Tripple_Helix

 

Thank you.. I didnt get a chance to type all of that, but you did it for me.

As per my question.. and your response, we have PROOF and EVIDENCE that earth is much older then 6,000 years old.. please disproove it for me.

He'll tell you what he told me. Carbon dating is a hoax. Dinosaur bones are a hoax. Really old dirt is a hoax. Only Jesus and Extra Dimensional Angels are real, dude. Accept it, and get into the after(party)life, already.

reply to post by thegagefather


This is not a discussion about theology or world views, please stick to the subject in my original OP.

Thank you.

Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by Tripple_Helix

 

I wonder why you keep replying with nothing constructive to add and feel the need to reply for other people. I'm sure theirs a few forum rules against spamming and the likes of what your doing. I'm not going to reply to any more off topic post's and will report them from now on, this is getting way out of hand. If you don't like me or the topic I have made then move on. you are not obligated to be here. I want this to be a interesting discussion and debate and thanks to a few individuals that regularly visit my threads people are going to get very bored reading through all this spam and off-topic posts. That's enough of this.

edit on 9-11-2011 by RevelationGeneration because: (no reason given)

Nothing here has been off-topic. You gave us a topic and we've chosen to reply the way we have because you have failed to provide any evidence of what you claim. You just simply claim that there is evidence and historical context, but don't provide any.

You can make any thread you want, that's true... But if you don't want to hear the opinions of the people whom you feed your ideas to, YOU, sir, are not obliged to be here.

Originally posted by thegagefather

Originally posted by tbonedude
reply to post by Tripple_Helix

 

Thank you.. I didnt get a chance to type all of that, but you did it for me.

As per my question.. and your response, we have PROOF and EVIDENCE that earth is much older then 6,000 years old.. please disproove it for me.

He'll tell you what he told me. Carbon dating is a hoax. Dinosaur bones are a hoax. Really old dirt is a hoax. Only Jesus and Extra Dimensional Angels are real, dude. Accept it, and get into the after(party)life, already.

Well, you calling me a troll is somewhat true.. if I had read the entire thread i'd have known that, thanks for pointing it out.

So what about the egyptians history? It clearly dates back 6,500 years BC and thats just the history thats left.. The rest of that kings tablet that im refering to was destroyed.. But it acts as a calendar and goes back 500 years longer then the OP agrees can even exist...

Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by thegagefather

 

This is not a discussion about theology or world views, please stick to the subject in my original OP.

Thank you.

We've all been asking for proof. Please provide proof. That's all I want. That's all we all want. Arguing your point that we don't believe isn't proof. A link to a source which is legitimately citable is the best form of proof you can pull from the internet, so maybe start there..

Originally posted by tbonedude

Originally posted by thegagefather

Originally posted by tbonedude
reply to post by Tripple_Helix

 

Thank you.. I didnt get a chance to type all of that, but you did it for me.

As per my question.. and your response, we have PROOF and EVIDENCE that earth is much older then 6,000 years old.. please disproove it for me.

He'll tell you what he told me. Carbon dating is a hoax. Dinosaur bones are a hoax. Really old dirt is a hoax. Only Jesus and Extra Dimensional Angels are real, dude. Accept it, and get into the after(party)life, already.

Well, you calling me a troll is somewhat true.. if I had read the entire thread i'd have known that, thanks for pointing it out.

So what about the egyptians history? It clearly dates back 6,500 years BC and thats just the history thats left.. The rest of that kings tablet that im refering to was destroyed.. But it acts as a calendar and goes back 500 years longer then the OP agrees can even exist...

I asked about the Sumerians... Still waiting on that response..

Originally posted by thegagefather

Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by thegagefather

 

This is not a discussion about theology or world views, please stick to the subject in my original OP.

Thank you.

We've all been asking for proof. Please provide proof. That's all I want. That's all we all want. Arguing your point that we don't believe isn't proof. A link to a source which is legitimately citable is the best form of proof you can pull from the internet, so maybe start there..

Proof of what? I have not claimed I have hard proof of anything. What's legitimately citable all depends on what you consider legitimate.

Originally posted by RevelationGeneration

Originally posted by thegagefather

Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by thegagefather

 

This is not a discussion about theology or world views, please stick to the subject in my original OP.

Thank you.

We've all been asking for proof. Please provide proof. That's all I want. That's all we all want. Arguing your point that we don't believe isn't proof. A link to a source which is legitimately citable is the best form of proof you can pull from the internet, so maybe start there..

Proof of what? I have not claimed I have hard proof of anything. What's legitimately citable all depends on what you consider legitimate.

It seems you are the one who makes the decision on what is a legitimate citable source.. Gonna avoid my question just as you did his?

Originally posted by thegagefather

Originally posted by tbonedude
reply to post by Tripple_Helix

 

Thank you.. I didnt get a chance to type all of that, but you did it for me.

As per my question.. and your response, we have PROOF and EVIDENCE that earth is much older then 6,000 years old.. please disproove it for me.

He'll tell you what he told me. Carbon dating is a hoax. Dinosaur bones are a hoax. Really old dirt is a hoax. Only Jesus and Extra Dimensional Angels are real, dude. Accept it, and get into the after(party)life, already.

Wow I didn't say any of that... please don't put word's into my mouth.

reply to post by RevelationGeneration

I wonder why you keep replying with nothing constructive to add and feel the need to reply for other people. I'm sure theirs a few forum rules against spamming and the likes of what your doing. I'm not going to reply to any more off topic post's and will report them from now on, this is getting way out of hand. If you don't like me or the topic I have made then move on. you are not obligated to be here. I want this to be a interesting discussion and debate and thanks to a few individuals that regularly visit my threads people are going to get very bored reading through all this spam and off-topic posts. That's enough of this.

Because I am puzzled by your logic. I'm sorry- I do not reply for other people. My replies are to the statements that you make. I keep on asking you questions but you avoid them like the plague.

Go on and report these "off topic posts". Most of them are yours.
You are right, I do not like you. My reason for that has been made clear by the first reply I made in this thread. You condemn anyone who doesn't share the same view as you to hell.

You are a bad example for true Christians.

But in any case- If you want me out of this thread, it's done.

I'm going to leave before I take my frustration out on my monitor.

Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by neobludragon

 

You can deny the existance all you want but I know the truth.

No you don't you think you do due to brainwashing from Hollywood but you are not even close to the truth my friend.

You have no evidence of life on other planets yet you blindly believe it because you have been programmed too.

I was once a believer in "E.T" myself until I learned what they really are.

Don't be ignorant and think just because the universe is large there has to be life, this is just intellectual dishonesty. That's like saying "I live out in the woods where theirs alot of beavers and beavers love wood so their must be a family of them somewhere in my log cabin, but I've never seen them".

No. It isn't. It really isn't anything like that at all. A wood is a small area with trees. The Universe is infinite. And if the Universe is infinite, then all things are possible within it, including life on other planets. As others have said, fossilized microbes have already been found on Martian rock. Mars is the next planet along to us. Do the math.

Originally posted by RevelationGeneration

Originally posted by thegagefather

Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by thegagefather

 

This is not a discussion about theology or world views, please stick to the subject in my original OP.

Thank you.

We've all been asking for proof. Please provide proof. That's all I want. That's all we all want. Arguing your point that we don't believe isn't proof. A link to a source which is legitimately citable is the best form of proof you can pull from the internet, so maybe start there..

Proof of what? I have not claimed I have hard proof of anything. What's legitimately citable all depends on what you consider legitimate.

The title of your post is completely definitive, implying that you have proof, or at least strong evidence of what you claim...

Originally posted by Troofseeker

Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by neobludragon

 

You can deny the existance all you want but I know the truth.

No you don't you think you do due to brainwashing from Hollywood but you are not even close to the truth my friend.

You have no evidence of life on other planets yet you blindly believe it because you have been programmed too.

I was once a believer in "E.T" myself until I learned what they really are.

Don't be ignorant and think just because the universe is large there has to be life, this is just intellectual dishonesty. That's like saying "I live out in the woods where theirs alot of beavers and beavers love wood so their must be a family of them somewhere in my log cabin, but I've never seen them".

The plurality of worlds is an ancient grecian concept. It doesn't originate from hollywood. Not even close.

Edit: It's actually far more ancient than that, but often times the Greeks are credited for it.


Extra Edit: No, it's not like that last scentence about beavers at all. It would be more like saying "Well, people live where there is water and oxygen, so it's probable to say that other things might live where there is water and oxygen"

What you said would be like saying "Well, people live where there is oxygen and water, so it's probable to say that there's people wearing scuba gear in siberia, I just haven't seen it."

reply to post by thegagefather


I have evidence, but its not satisfactory for you.

Are you done yet?

reply to post by RevelationGeneration


· King James Version, KJV (1611) - The most popular translation ever produced, this Bible was done during the reign and at the urging of King James the I of England. 47 scholars, divided into 6 groups, worked on this translation. Based largely on the Bishop's Bible, many Hebrew and Greek texts were also studied as well as all the other available English translations, to insure the best results. By choosing men of many different theological and educational backgrounds, it was hoped individual prejudices of the translators could be minimized. Printed in a handy size and in clear type, the KJV was suppose to please clergy and congregation alike. Despite initial resistance, the KJV became and still is the largest selling translation of the Bible.

· Revised Version (1881-1884) - Designed to be a revision of the KJV, the Revised Version, had the advantage of being able to access some of the ancient manuscripts. Although this revision was sponsored by the Church of England, many American scholars were invited to participate.

New English Versions
(1901 to Present)

I must appologize for my 7 or 8 as previousally said. Those are the 3 times its been re-written.

See what I did there? I had a theory... found evidence to proove or disproove it.. and well.. its pointless to explain the rest of that because you wouldent follow any how...

You've still avoided my question...

Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by Swills

 

Trolls don't get 150 flags and 939 stars now though do they?

/off topic

yes they do, just look at Phage

/on topic

You contradict yourself too often to be taken seriously.

You say ur not religious yet you keep calling for what's written in the Bible and said by Jesus as proof of your claims.

Blatantly blanketing the existance of alien life so that they all MUST be interdimensional just so it fits your view of us being special and created by some bored allmighty being just TALKING us into existance.

This just once again proves to me how biased both science and religion are, soon to be just religion since science seems to be finally catching up with the "unknown"

Originally posted by RevelationGeneration
reply to post by thegagefather

 

I have evidence, but its not satisfactory for you.

Are you done yet?

....No. No, you do not.

I'll be done when you stop talking about said evidence and show it.