It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Amanda5
The people who are out in the street are visible for all to see.
Regardless of whether you think they are helping their cause by standing up to TPTB or whether they are playing into the hands of TPTB - they are visible.
By being visible they are being heard - any other method would be lesser - like diluting cordial. The people out on the street are individuals and as such they will not have a single message. The real message is - we are the people you rule over - we are here in front of you and the television cameras.
The cabal/illuminati/whatever would probably rather they all went home because that would make life easier for them. The longer the people stay out on the street the more annoyed the cabal/illuminati/whatever will become. As for martial law - the cabal/illuminati/whatever could enact that right now if they wanted. Anyone who is in the awakened state knows that the cabal/illuminati/whatever do not need a reason to do anything. They do whatever they want whenever they want.
To the people out on the street - in all the locations around the world - stay where you are - when the snow comes - rug up. The only thing the cabal/illuminati/whatever got wrong with all their plans of world dominance is the fact that money will not save them. Once they have all the money in the world - what will that mean? It will mean more people to be part of the occupy *insert location here* - the people on the street are not worried about money - they are concerned about their individual issues - the cabal should be concerned with the fact that money is not going to save them in the long run - it will actually be their undoing.
Much Peace...
Originally posted by christina-66
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
Aaaah - so you're a fascist - that explains everything.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
reply to post by blackhatchet
Let's worry about our country first, and then we can worry about the UN, where after all we still have a vote. Who we put in there TO vote might matter more. And if this oligarchical trend continues, that won't be who we want there voting for us, eh?
Nice thought, but the UN is already in our lives and in our country. All those buzzwords like "sustainability" and "stakeholder" came right out of the UN Agenda 21. The UN supports the World Heritage Sites declaring national parks and other lands and landmarks to be sites of UN special control. The UN is filtering its ideas and ideology right down into all the little NGO's and fringe groups and township councils.
Originally posted by MidnightTide
Originally posted by christina-66
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
Good - but note you are unable to answer fundamental questions.
edit on 30-10-2011 by christina-66 because: (no reason given)
Oh I think they were answered, just people with your mindset chose not to listen. (or even knowledge that conservatives even support "SOME" of what OWS represents)
==========================================================================
To the OWS supporters:
I hear so much of this "taking" back what is ours - what is that exactly, and how do you plan on distributing it among the masses...and better yet, how are you going to identify those to take it from?
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by christina-66
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
No you're right I feel no endearment toward your mindset - but I can't agree that I've involved myself in vicious name calling. You obviously haven't heard me at my best...that was only me being a tad patronising.
Now I've told you what I'm for...and asked you what you stand for as you deride those who attempt to facilitate change - you failed to respond. I've also asked you what you suggest people do in the face of blatant corruption and in the face of the theft of ours and our children's future....please respond or I will be unable to take you seriously.edit on 30-10-2011 by christina-66 because: (no reason given)
What I stand for as I "deride" those who want change? I will deride all the communist sympathizers and Party operatives I feel like, I will deride Obama change agents, I will deride George Soros and anti corporate communist agitators adbusters and Tides Foundations, as they organized and funded the operations. I will deride those who are agitating for violence.
I was in the Tea Party protests, so now you know, what I stand for is limited government and free enterprise and the principles of our Founding Fathers.
I also hope you support ending the unjust wars and reigning in the industrial military complex, as well as making those behind the scenes in the large corporations accountable for their actions.edit on 30-10-2011 by MidnightTide because: (no reason given)
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
Aaaah - so you're a fascist - that explains everything.
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
reply to post by blackhatchet
Let's worry about our country first, and then we can worry about the UN, where after all we still have a vote. Who we put in there TO vote might matter more. And if this oligarchical trend continues, that won't be who we want there voting for us, eh?
Nice thought, but the UN is already in our lives and in our country. All those buzzwords like "sustainability" and "stakeholder" came right out of the UN Agenda 21. The UN supports the World Heritage Sites declaring national parks and other lands and landmarks to be sites of UN special control. The UN is filtering its ideas and ideology right down into all the little NGO's and fringe groups and township councils.
Yes...and, as I said, they will continue to be able to dominate and take advantage of us as we stand divided...with the moneyholders in charge.
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by christina-66
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
Aaaah - so you're a fascist - that explains everything.
I didn't see any there so you must be serious. Third Eye is as much a fascist as Mother Therese was. Pushed to extremes, maybe a harsh word may escape but, no fascist here.
You owe ThirdEye a big apology.
Originally posted by christina-66
reply to post by ThirdEyeofHorus
Aaaah - so you're a fascist - that explains everything.