It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by no1smootha
This proves to me that even highly educated people can be paranoid. I wish I could find the peer reviews of this.
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Uh, no. The Manchurian Candidate is not a good example as it is a fictional cinematic endeavor.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
...rabid defense...
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
I will have you know I had my rabies vaccine.
Originally posted by MemoryShock
The following video can be argued and I expect you to, however that is just the first resource...if you care to push the topic, we can have a more interesting discussion than the usual rabid defense of Masons I usually see from your posts (not bad; just a topic that I care not for).
"Final conclusion that NASA is 100% ruled by Illuminati Freemasons with a secret agenda for hide the existence of intelligent alien civilizations from mankind." - 1AnunnakiBastard
HC's Ancient Aliens MINDBLOWING episode "The NASA Connection"
John Parsons (aka Marvel Whiteside Parsons, Jack Parsons), an occultist, communicated with SS NAZI officer Werner Von Braun and by the age of 13 began summoning evil spirits and demons with rituals learned from Aliester Crowley, whom Jack referred to as his father. He designed and patented several liquid and solid rocket engines still being used today on ICBMs and the space shuttle. It utilizes a pentagram shaped void pressed into the solid rocket fuel to assist burning.
Originally posted by partycrasher
Re to No1 smooth "Actually Freemasons have very good memories. By the time we are Master Masons we have thousands of words committed to memory, as any Brother here can attest"
perfect example of what I have been stating, you have had to make room in your mind for all of this nonsensical info that is only needed when you are clubbing it.
lol gluteus maximus or whatever external validation title you feel you need to go by.
I do not attend cultmeetings with you otherwise I would talk the same preprogrammed talk as a mainstream lackey like you.
However I feel that since I have had enough exposure to these cliques and have not become another cell in the composite jellyfish organism that owns you I can participate in evaluations of your mob.
you attampt to perpetuate the mindset that no one inside talks about the group and then your group explains that members do leave the gang and you further attempt to kkkontrol discussions about your coven by stating that " oh they were disgruntled with the broderbund" or " they were not accepted because of a felony conviction" etc. as if your fellow cultists/elitists are better than everybody else ( the profane) and we are all subject to your ridicule which is similar to all other racist/religious slant ridicule " goyim, gaijin. infidel. heathen, outlander, outsider" etc.
I can take that as another admission. it is good that you masons want to get things off your chest and come clean as it is a lot of weight for someone to bear all of those secrets and try to hold down two realities.
the healing process will have some pain but in the end you will be glad you left the clan.
Originally posted by 1nOne
Getsmart: Please, at your convenience, read my posts concerning Freemasonry and Satanism.
It has been whispered that the internet itself is a "Window" or a "portal" to realms of the non-living.
Your thoughts?
The key point in the argument is that the system of symbols common to Freemasons around the world (centering on the Architect of the Universe and given added weight by the rule of secrecy) tends to foster a "supraconfessional humanitarian" way of conceiving the divine that neutralizes or replaces the faith dimension of our relationship with God. Even though given lodges may abstain from endorsing any particular position, including one that considers religious faith to be a matter of indifference (i.e., nothing more than a matter of personal preference), the contemporary world's social atmosphere of moral and religious relativism creates a climate in which a merely humanitarian symbol system works to undermine the religious faith by which we receive God's revelation.
It was for this reason that the Congregation declared that local church authorities are not competent to give a judgment on the nature of Masonic associations, and has reserved to itself the right to make any such pronouncements. Because of the serious danger posed to individual Catholics by the subtle but real influence of symbols described above, the Congregation declared that it would be objectively a grave sin for a Catholic to join a Masonic lodge. The prohibition from receiving Holy Communion is meant to highlight the gravity of the situation. - Reverand Thomas C. Anslow, CM., J.C.L. Vicar for Canonical Services
Why Roman Catholics Oppose Freemasonry
Originally posted by Getsmart
Yes, they ARE members of a Religious sect, a Satanic Religion called the Cult of Lucifer gone underground centuries ago. Any decent, moral human being would be revolted by a Religion which says that Good is Evil and Evil is Good, and which militantly advances the cause of Hell on Earth.
The Temple measures 210 feet which comes to 64 meters in height, which means that the sacrificial alter must be exactly 8.5 feet below ground level in a cellar used for rituals. Its location at that depth would make it exactly 66.6 meters below the top elevation of the cathedral, if you are familiar with their taste for symbolic numbers - 666 represents in numerical form... the AntiChrist.
Originally posted by Getsmart
Hi Memory Shock,
Unfortunately the video you linked to is "malformed". Since we don't know to what video you might have been referring, do you think you could find another link?
Originally posted by Getsmart
The Temple measures 210 feet which comes to 64 meters in height, which means that the sacrificial alter must be exactly 8.5 feet below ground level in a cellar used for rituals. Its location at that depth would make it exactly 66.6 meters below the top elevation of the cathedral, if you are familiar with their taste for symbolic numbers - 666 represents in numerical form... the AntiChrist.
Originally posted by KSigMason
Keyword in this paragraph is "must", not "is". The OP cannot say for sure what the "sacrificial altar" is at or even if there is one.
Originally posted by Getsmart
We will note that while the Washington Monument, a phallic obelisk, is 555.5 feet tall...
...and 55.5 feet wide on each side at its base...
...this by coincidence just happens to translate into 6666 inches tall and 666 inches wide.
Not to mention that while this additional measurement has been contested, tour guides in Washington D.C. routinely tell tourists that its foundation is 20 percent of its height, which corresponds to a the buried height of Its foundation of 111.1 feet deep, which would give a total length of the obelisk from its bottom to its top of 666.6 feet.
Lower Freemasons, among which there are a very likely greater number of honest people, will clamor that they know nothing about any of all this Others will explain it by virtue of mysterious ancient architectural numbers forming some exalted perfection of constructed buildings.
Originally posted by Getsmart
Not to mention that while this additional measurement has been contested, tour guides in Washington D.C. routinely tell tourists that its foundation is 20 percent of its height, which corresponds to a the buried height of Its foundation of 111.1 feet deep, which would give a total length of the obelisk from its bottom to its top of 666.6 feet.
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
The foundation is slightly over 36' deep which makes your assinine 666 figure, well, assinine.
Originally posted by Getsmart
Thus St Patrick's day has a downside?
Had you been less hellbent upon attacking my post, you might have read it properly and noted that I clearly stated that the foundation depth measurement is contested.
Had I any proclivity such as those of the highest ranking Masons for anything demonic, I would be embracing "brothers" such as yourself rather than oppsing them.
After all, the predecessors of your order, the Templars...
...had their Knights kiss the anus of their high priest.
...you are "perfectly possessed" - but it would be by a lower order demon way down in the hierarchy of Hell, not everyone is directly connected with hte big bad boy.
Otherwise it would be odd that you would dare to so vehemently deny the unholy character of the number 666, revered in awe by Satanists.
This should hopefully strike the minds of those who cannot understand the implications of Satanists ruling over Science.