It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Just be glad they aren't burning down the houses yet... just poopin on them
Originally posted by dc4lifeskater
Originally posted by SM2
reply to post by ChemistryAdept
and why should a business owner, lets say a restaurant owner, feel compelled to spend the extra money on cleaning supplies and such for his restrooms to allow a bunch of non customers use his facilities, when this protest is almost assuredly all ready impacting his business by the loss of customers due to the protests? it is private property and he has the right to refuse anyone service, and refuse anyone entry to his property. I am sure, that if a protester was his/her costumer, they would be free to use the restrooms.
Because we are human beings (that use to mean something) and we are americans (that use to mean something to) and actually most of the business's surrounding OWS that are locally owned are doing pretty well thanks to the protesters being there.. One pizza place is making upwards of 250 pizzas per day for the protesters that are being paid for by donations from all around the US...
The problem is there aren't that many places, there are to many people so there are not enough bathrooms to go around... So like I said if the CITY would ALLOW the protesters to setup proper toilets to use maybe they wouldn't have to go to the bathroom outside which I am sure none of them are happy about doing because not to many people enjoy going to the bathroom outdoors in front of a bunch of people...
Just be glad they aren't burning down the houses yet... just poopin on them
Also in case you didn't know small locally owned business's pay more taxes and get less tax breaks then huge companies that make billions in profits and pay virtually no taxes... Imagine that, sounds fair right?
Fed up homeowners said that they've been subjected to insults and harassment as they trek to their jobs each morning. "The protesters taunt people who are on their way to work," said James Fernandez, 51, whose apartment overlooks the park.
Many Spaniards today feel that their country — much like the United States — has settled into a stagnant and corrupt political system. They believe that the two major parties are virtually indistinguishable on the issues that affect people’s lives the most, because both are ruled by the “tyranny of common sense.” “Keep the banks, big business and the credit rating agencies happy, by imposing austerity on, and demanding efficiency from, your citizens. Let your citizens vote every once in a while —we are, after all, a democracy— and make sure that they keep consuming. When elections come around, each party should trot out the trusted, old wedge issues, which camouflage the profound similarities between the two parties and focus the attention on largely superficial or symbolic differences. The two political parties must bring out their bases on election day, even if voters have to hold their noses in disgust when they vote. Each party must scare voters into believing that the stench of the other guy is even worse than ours.”
A new common sense seems to be emerging in the wake of May 15. Many Spaniards have finally decided to say out loud, in public squares, and virtual spaces that didn’t exist 10 years ago, that you are not alone or disloyal if you think that the choices stink, if it looks to you like the emperor has no clothes, if you feel that the demos has been dropped from democracy. The protesters in Spain are wondering aloud why their access to their leaders is limited to casting a ballot once every four years, while banks, business leaders and credit rating agencies seem to have unlimited access.
The protesters are asking the basic questions supposedly left behind in these commonsensical, post-historical, post-ideological times. They are refusing to take the bait of the parties’ wedge issues. They are claiming that the two main parties have been taking them for granted, and they are saying to all of this: “basta ya.” Enough is enough.
“Stealing is our biggest problem at the moment,” said Nan Terrie, 18, a kitchen and legal-team volunteer from Fort Lauderdale.
“I had my Mac stolen -- that was like $5,500. Every night, something else is gone. Last night, our entire [kitchen] budget for the day was stolen, so the first thing I had to do was . . . get the message out to our supporters that we needed food!”
Yan, R. N., & Lotz, S. (2009). Taxonomy of the influence of other customers in consumer complaint behavior: A social-psychological perspective. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 22, 107-126.
Originally posted by jjjtir
October 17, 2011 - New Yorkers Back Wall St. Protesters 3 - 1, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Stay As Long As You Want, Even Republicans Say
www.quinnipiac.edu/x1302.xml?ReleaseID=1662
By a 67 - 23 percent margin, New York City voters agree with the views of the Wall Street protesters and say 87 - 10 percent that it is "okay that they are protesting," according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today.
Agreeing with the protesters views are Democrats 81 - 11 percent and independent voters 58 - 30 percent, while Republicans disagree 58 - 35 percent, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN-uh-pe-ack) University poll finds. Even Republicans, however, agree 73 - 23 percent with the protesters right to be there.
New York City voters say 72 - 24 percent, including 52 - 41 percent among Republicans, that if the protesters obey the law, they can stay as long as they wish.
A total of 72 percent of voters say they understand the protesters' views "very well" or "fairly well," with 17 percent who say "not too well" and 10 percent who say "not well at all."
Voters split 46 - 45 percent in their approval of the way police are handling the Wall Street protest, but approve 61 - 33 percent of how the police are doing their job overall.
(...)
Originally posted by marzabeth
reply to post by marg6043
I thought the protestors were protesting against the 1%? Surely you aren't suggesting that trillionaires are slogging off to work each and every morning by foot are you? These aren't the 1% and you know it. Turns out you all are just pissed at anyone that has anything better than you.
Originally posted by TinfoilTP
They are 99% annoying filthy freeloaders, that makeup is fully believable.
Great story OP
OWS...Occupying Wastes of Skin
Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
Assuming this is true, I see an easy fix to the bathroom problem
The city just has to stop refusing to allow the OWS movement the permit to rent and bring in toilets, with their own money. Or the city could show that they care about the peoples complains and start providing the toilets in order to stop this problem...
But the thing is the city is not allowing toilets to be brought in. People go to the bathroom and this does not stop just because there are no toilets available. If you want to blame some one, blame the city for not allowing toilets to be brought in.
As for the drumming, I can understand that complaint. Where I live there is a 10 PM noise curfew. If you are making noise that disturbs the peace after 10 PM you get a ticket. Those who are drumming, need to be respectful and stop drumming at a reasonable hour. If not maybe start handing out tickets.
As for yelling at passer bys, all I can say is, IT'S A FREAKING PROTEST! they will shout and chant at passer by's. That is going to happen.
There, that is all I have to say. Feel free to attack me or revere me all you want.
Originally posted by blupblup
The OP of this thread has been on many OWS threads and has an agenda.... they are against the movement and along with others on the site, are trying every tactic to rubbish and discredit the movement.
Just ignore them.
Mayor Bloomberg said Friday that he's going to start turning the screws on the Occupy Wall Streeters.
The city is planning to take a harder line on demonstrators camping out in Zuccotti Park - and insist on permits every time they want to march through Lower Manhattan, he said.
"We will start enforcing that more," Bloomberg said on his weekly radio show.
Part of the difficulty for the city is that OWS is made of a number of different groups and nobody speaks for them all.
"It's a little bit complicated by there's nobody to work it out with," he said. "There just is not any one group, one idealogy, one objective, one person to negotiate with."
Originally posted by CastleMadeOfSand
Where's the OP at?
4 pages and he's only replied 3 times in only the first page. That should tell you what you are dealing with.
......A troll with an agenda.
Can anybody show me evidence of people actually "raging" over OWS? ....NO? ....Ok!
Originally posted by jibeho
NEWSFLASH! Bloomberg is finally manning up. I think
Mayor Bloomberg said Friday that he's going to start turning the screws on the Occupy Wall Streeters.
The city is planning to take a harder line on demonstrators camping out in Zuccotti Park - and insist on permits every time they want to march through Lower Manhattan, he said.
"We will start enforcing that more," Bloomberg said on his weekly radio show.
Chaos just Like Alinsky called for. Even Bloomberg see's it that way. I see it as pathetic!
Part of the difficulty for the city is that OWS is made of a number of different groups and nobody speaks for them all.
"It's a little bit complicated by there's nobody to work it out with," he said. "There just is not any one group, one idealogy, one objective, one person to negotiate with."
Read more: www.nydailynews.com...
Boo Hoo