It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
And gravity is still a theory of an effect that has no known cause.
And if one doesn't really know what causes the effect, then one doesn't really comprehend the problem.
And if one doesn't comprehend the problem, then the theory is a wild ass guess.
If the theory is a wild ass guess, educated or not, the theory is simply conjecture.
Until someone figures out what causes gravity, the effects are simply miracles that cannot be explained because one can simply say, God causes gravity, and no one can prove otherwise.
Originally posted by diamondsmith
reply to [url=http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread756912/pg13#pid12457994] we are better and faster then you guys,maybe the following days will bring you what you so desperate do not wan't to became public!you will see just patience,please......very please!
Originally posted by Xcalibur254
reply to post by consciousgod
Then why believe anything? Even if one day EU hypothesis becomes a theory it too will be disproven one day. So why support it? We have to go on with what we have and so far the theories we have make accurate predictions. Could they be wrong? Probably. But why discount them before that's even proven? They serve their purpose and they drive the experiments that allow science to progress.
EM is caused by the interaction of charged particles.
The whole Elenin thing was riding on the earthquake correlation. That was the only strong line of evidence.
Regarding EU, If you have been watching Nasa, you would know that the Aurora Australis is glowing like the atmosphere is on green fire and Nasa says its because the Earth is electromagnetically connected to the sun. What theory does this support?
Regarding Newton. Yes, his work did provide for somewhat accurate predictions, but these predictions do not work well enough to be used to calculate satellite orbits today. GR is used because the results better match the observations. This indicates that Newton's work has limits and that his predictions are no longer valid for modern day use. His equations are obsolete.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by consciousgod
And gravity is still a theory of an effect that has no known cause.
And if one doesn't really know what causes the effect, then one doesn't really comprehend the problem.
And if one doesn't comprehend the problem, then the theory is a wild ass guess.
If the theory is a wild ass guess, educated or not, the theory is simply conjecture.
Until someone figures out what causes gravity, the effects are simply miracles that cannot be explained because one can simply say, God causes gravity, and no one can prove otherwise.
You begin with the right idea and then go off the deep end.
It is true that the cause of gravity is not well understood. That has no bearing on the ability to make very strong predictions based on what is known. It does not make the long history of excellent predictions any weaker. It does alter the situation that observable facts are well described by the theory.
It's really laughable that you would call any of the predictions such as the Earth receding 15cm a year from the Sun a miracle. It's even funnier to mix religion into this.
The problem as we have discussed before is that you do not understand the meaning of the word theory when it is used in science.
I think it crazy to say you know what something is when you admit you don't know what something is.. It's gravity that causes the receding, but what is gravity? It's an unknown.
"not well understood" So tell me the not well understood, because right now, I think the cause of gravity is not understood, and there is no "well".
The cause of gravity is NOT understood and the effects are understood as observed.
Now, I can take a wild ass guess and say gravity is the by-product of quantum EMF polarity caused by quantum spin. Can you prove me wrong?
Comparing gravity to electrons is comparing apples to oranges. Gravity is an effect. An electron is a thing. If you want to make a comparison, compare things that are somewhat similar. We know what causes electromagnetism. We don't know what causes gravity.
EM is caused by the interaction of charged particles. Tell me what causes gravity? Could gravity simply be the effects of polarity similar to what makes a water molecule polar? I don't know. Do you?
The whole Elenin thing was riding on the earthquake correlation. That was the only strong line of evidence. The experiment indicates this correlation was a staggering coincidence so far. It doesn't mean the EU theory is wrong. It means Elenin didn't cause the earthquakes.
Regarding EU, If you have been watching Nasa, you would know that the Aurora Australis is glowing like the atmosphere is on green fire and Nasa says its because the Earth is electromagnetically connected to the sun. What theory does this support?
Regarding Newton. Yes, his work did provide for somewhat accurate predictions, but these predictions do not work well enough to be used to calculate satellite orbits today. GR is used because the results better match the observations. This indicates that Newton's work has limits and that his predictions are no longer valid for modern day use. His equations are obsolete.
And one day, Einstein's equations may be obsolete as well. It's just a matter of time until something better comes along. This is true for all theories even the dirty snow ball.
And the naming of a comet with Leonid Elenin.. a more sensitive name may have been appropriate ! E L E N I N
Constellation LEO extinction level event nibiru in november.
And the recent bizarre news conference on near earth objects.
Whilst a dramatic increase in seismic activity has occurred and a huge increase in volcano activity
Stock market crashes to lowest in 9 years.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by mockrock
And the recent bizarre news conference on near earth objects.
You think it is bizarre that the threat is lower than previous thought?
They say it is lower than previously thought.. and that we should just relax, but they keep missing them and only announce as they whizz by.. I argue that they wouldn't tells us. Do you really have trust in NASA!? Can you explain why they issued warnings to all of their staff?
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by mockrock
Whilst a dramatic increase in seismic activity has occurred and a huge increase in volcano activity
Actually volcanic activity is fairly constant over the last 50 years.
How do you define 'fairly constant'
www.earth.webecs.co.uk...
If you add the figures from what has happened this year so far.. dramatic increase is no exaggeration.