It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Ok lets extend your silly "model" to include the failed floors. There were 110 failed floors falling down in the end. So you have (16x-89x+110x)9.8m/s=362.6x. I know, it all doesn't make any sense, because your "math" doesn't make any sense to begin with. But look, the number is positive now.
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
reply to post by -PLB-
um, no. for newton's third law to back you up, you needed extra mass, so you added the weight of the falling floors to the weight of the tower, and said it was all falling on the tower.
Ok lets extend your silly "model" to include the failed floors. There were 110 failed floors falling down in the end. So you have (16x-89x+110x)9.8m/s=362.6x. I know, it all doesn't make any sense, because your "math" doesn't make any sense to begin with. But look, the number is positive now.
you admit it doesn't make any sense, because you're saying the whole entire 110 floors PLUS 16 other floors all falls on to the 110 story tower.
i'm sorry, but you must be trolling.
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
um, no. for newton's third law to back you up, you needed extra mass, so you added the weight of the falling floors to the weight of the tower, and said it was all falling on the tower.
you admit it doesn't make any sense, because you're saying the whole entire 110 floors PLUS 16 other floors all falls on to the 110 story tower.
i'm sorry, but you must be trolling.
(16x-89x+110x)9.8m/s=362.6x
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by Bob Sholtz
How about this, lets wait until you have your degree in physics and then continue this conversation. If you are unable to see that your "model" is totally flawed, even when explained why, it is rather pointless to continue it now.
Originally posted by ErtaiNaGia
reply to post by Joey Canoli
Concrete used in the WTC: 780,000 metric tons
Originally posted by seachange
The basement was up to 80 feet deep according to:
globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com...
The towers are 208ft x208ft wide according to:
www.memorialcircle.com...
The density of concrete is 2.4g/cc according to:
www.everything-about-concrete.com...
208ft x 208ft wide x 80ft deep = 3,461,120 ft^3 = 98,008,005cc concrete capacity
98,008,005cc capacity x 2.4g/cc = 235,219,210kg concrete = 235,219 metric tons
235,219 metric ton capacity / 780,000 metric tons actual weight = 0.30156 = 30.2%
Therefore, 30.2% of the concrete used in the construction could have collapsed into the basement, if it were perfectly compacted and the only thing allowed in the basement was concrete. That would not happen however, because there would be air pockets, drywall, steel, and the contents of the building to consider.
But stuff falls on floors, not on columns.
Originally posted by Alien Abduct
So, why weren't the columns still standing?
Originally posted by waypastvne
WTC 7 's 4 walls were well attached at the corners, and the outer walls did stand for several seconds after the internal collapse started.
Originally posted by Alien Abduct
Originally posted by ANOK
reply to post by Alien Abduct
According to the resident OS supporters the floors held up the core, and the core could not stand once the floors failed.
Originally posted by ANOK
Oh boy OSer Logic.
Yes they conveniently waited for the buildings interior to collapse perfectly timed in order to allow themselves to fall inwards, resulting in the majority of the building landing in its own footprint causing minimal damage to very close surrounding buildings.
All from sporadic fires, and asymmetrical damage that did nothing to the buildings load bearing structure.
Originally posted by waypastvne
The floors stabilised the core. That is what we are saying. What are you saying they did ?
Originally posted by waypastvne
Would you care to describe the difference in how the conners were connected together between WTC 1&2 and WTC 7 Truther ?
Originally posted by ANOK
the problem is you seem to think 47 columns crossed braced together would fall straight down from the lack of the stabilizing floors.