It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by ANOK
Yes, floors that are no longer connected to anything and completely free to fall down are offering resistance. It is because of their magical floating power, right Anok?
Originally posted by spy66
The falling floors would not fall horizontally/leveled down to the floor under, do friction from the core + walls and broken connection points. Remember each floor was also covered with cement, furniture and other debris. The weight on top of each floor(s) were never evenly spaced around the floors. So the floors would fall down at an angle. That means one side of the floor would break of and fall first.
When one side falls down before the rest of the floor. Mass effecting the floor under gets another meaning. The falling edge would probably never break the floor under of its connection points.edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by -PLB-
Here is an explanation that actually makes sense:
15 floors in the top hit the upper floor of the lower 85 floors. Both a floor in the bottom and top fail. Now you have 16 floors falling.
14 floors in the top + 2 failed floor hit the upper floor of the lower 84 floors. The floor fails as result of the 2 failed floors and top hitting it. Now you have 17 floors falling.
14 floors in the top + 3 failed floor hit the upper floor of the lower 83 floors. The floor fails as result of the 3 failed floors and top hitting it. Now you have 18 floors falling.
14 floors in the top + 4 failed floor hit the upper floor of the lower 82 floors. The floor fails as result of the 4 failed floors and top hitting it. Now you have 19 floors falling.
You can of course make variations on this, where more floors in the top fail. But even a truther should be able to understand that the lower floors that have all the failed floors plus the top section falling on them fail easier than floors in the top that do not have the failed floors falling on them.
Here is an explanation that actually makes sense:
15 floors in the top hit the upper floor of the lower 85 floors. Both a floor in the bottom and top fail. Now you have 16 floors falling.
14 floors in the top + 2 failed floor hit the upper floor of the lower 84 floors. The floor fails as result of the 2 failed floors and top hitting it. Now you have 17 floors falling.
14 floors in the top + 3 failed floor hit the upper floor of the lower 83 floors. The floor fails as result of the 3 failed floors and top hitting it. Now you have 18 floors falling.
14 floors in the top + 4 failed floor hit the upper floor of the lower 82 floors. The floor fails as result of the 4 failed floors and top hitting it. Now you have 19 floors falling.
You can of course make variations on this, where more floors in the top fail. But even a truther should be able to understand that the lower floors that have all the failed floors plus the top section falling on them fail easier than floors in the top that do not have the failed floors falling on them.
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by ANOK
Now, quit saying we're wrong and address the equal opposite reaction, and momentum conservation laws, in context with 110 concrete, and steel panned, floors collapsing themselves into the ground.
So how does gravity work in Truther World ?
How do you turn it off after the top block of floors collapse an equal number of lower floors ?
Originally posted by -PLB-
reply to post by ANOK
I indeed can not fathom that the majority of the floors ejected, because there is no physics that can explain that, nor any evidence to support it, and I don't believe in magic.
Originally posted by ANOK
How many more time does it have to be explained that gravity is not going to overcome resistance!! Resistance of undamaged structure is far greater than the force of gravity. If gravity was that strong, buildings wouldn't stand in the first place. Can you place a 20lb weight on an apple, and not have that apple crush, yes you can, so gravity is not that strong a force is it? Drop it from a height, and yes it can crush the apple, now try dropping the apple on the weight from any height you like, and at any velocity. The apple will not even dent the 20lb weight.
How can the top block collapse an equal number of lower floors? For every static floor that is destroyed a falling floor will also be destroyed. If they are NOT destroyed then the build up of floors, when they no longer have anywhere to fall, would stop the collapse. All this has already explained, if only you would quit forgetting what has already been explained when you attempt to debunk from another angle.
Unequal mass, unequal damage, larger the mass the less the damage. Force on both objects is the same, equal opposite reaction. The only different is MASS, and if you want to get more detailed also density. But we're talking objects of equal mass, and density, concrete and steel panned floors. If just two of the those floors impacted the damage would be similar to both, now drop 15 of those onto 95, and you've got the apple falling on the weight. An exaggerated example, but if you don't get the point from that then you are seriously in denial, or seriously dishonest.
This is not 'truther world' this is reality PLB, welcome to it.
Originally posted by spy66
-85 floors are designed to take load from above. Non of the 15 floors are designed to take force from Bellow.
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
in your model, you're saying that 16 floors fell on 89, which caused wtc building 2 to fly up in the sky and be dropped on top of building 1.
Originally posted by Varemia
Do you really not get that the vertical support columns are what resist gravity? Once the collapse is putting the pressure of gravity on points that are not the vertical supports, then there is very little resistance.
It's akin to taking a metal pole, and standing it straight up, then balancing a 50 pound weight on top of it. It holds it up because the vertical pole is able to hold the weight and resist it.
Originally posted by 5MaveN5
Originally posted by Varemia
Do you really not get that the vertical support columns are what resist gravity? Once the collapse is putting the pressure of gravity on points that are not the vertical supports, then there is very little resistance.
It's akin to taking a metal pole, and standing it straight up, then balancing a 50 pound weight on top of it. It holds it up because the vertical pole is able to hold the weight and resist it.
Good point..
What do YOU suppose happend to ALL of the vertical support columns in the 3 buildings??
Originally posted by Varemia
Originally posted by spy66
-85 floors are designed to take load from above. Non of the 15 floors are designed to take force from Bellow.
This is simply not true. The open-space floors had no design for upper resistance. The vertical columns, yes, but not the floors. The horizontal supports would shear almost instantly.
Why would the vertical columns not resist on the falling floors, yet resist on the static floors? It makes no sense. The horizontal columns are what is failing, not the vertical columns. Their resistance and load capabilities are irrelevant.
Why would the vertical columns not resist on the falling floors, yet resist on the static floors? It makes no sense. The horizontal columns are what is failing, not the vertical columns. Their resistance and load capabilities are irrelevant.