It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by curtius
reply to post by Frira
rockets---who needs rockets. sounds like somebody is way beyond rockets.
Originally posted by spikey
Originally posted by wutz4tom
Originally posted by wutz4tom
reply to post by ASC Nole
Sorry, but I do not believe if this were true that you would jeapordize your clearance by posting on here.Just my opinion.
I must admit I make mistakes and could be wrong...
Example: for years I thought the reason that they wouldn't admit that there were these flying objects in our skies was because.....* It would give the impression they were NOT in control of the situation..
Now I'm wondering if ....They Knew that Many of these ships were ours all along. Better to let the population think that they were outside visitors and keep the spotlight off themselves?
Unless time travel is a secret reality too (debatable), they cannot be responsible for the huge quantity of pre-20th century UFO and ET reports, and sightings.
Ufology didn't start in the 1940's...sightings go back thousands of years right up till the present day.
Some of the sightings? 100% our advanced and secret craft, absolutely true.
All of the sightings? Not a chance.
-My final question to him was the moon, mars, and secret space programs. He admitted to me that there was more than just Apollo 18, 19, 20, but the Russians have had men on the moon, and we have been there back and forth more times than you can even imagine. He also stated we have bases on the moon with 100% certainty a
LA-UR-88-1192; CONF-880594-1
Steps toward lunar settlement
Jones, E.M. 1988 Jan 01
INL/CON-08-14353
A Basic LEGO Reactor Design for the Provision of Lunar Surface Power
John Darrell Bess 2008 Jun 01
LA-UR-85-363; CONF-8410230-9
Mechanical properties of lunar materials under anhydrous, hard vacuum conditions: applications of lunar glass structural components
Blacic, J.D. 1984 Jan 01
LA-UR-85-384; CONF-8410230-7
In-situ rock melting applied to lunar base construction and for exploration drilling and coring on the moon
Rowley, J.C. ; Neudecker, J.W. 1984 Jan 01
LA-UR-86-1481; CONF-860179-1
Can the US afford a lunar base
Keaton, P.W. 1986 Jan 01
LA-UR--94-1958; CONF-940812--11
Lunar surface fission power supplies: Radiation issues
Houts, M.G. ; Lee, S.K. 1994 Jul 01
LA-UR-86-2213; CONF-8606145-1
Lunar laboratory
Keaton, P.W. ; Duke, M.B. 1986 Jan 01
DOE/NV/25946--488
Lunar Wireless Power Transfer Feasibility Study ((((( Tesla Technolagy ???? )
Sheldon Freid, et al. 2008 Jun 01
There are real commercial activities that private enterprises could develop on the moon as well: Helium 3 can be mined, and heavy metal meteorites could be a source of rare earth metals. And the presence of water ice would make great rocket fuel — and rocket fuel is gets us to Mars. Aldrin thinks that base could form part of a transportation infrastructure that would enable us to get to near Earth objects such as asteroids, Martian moon Phobos, even Mars itself and beyond.
Originally posted by ASC Nole
oh, I admit, im grammer is horrid, always has been. But can you figure out the EPOC and preigee of a rocket leaving China and figure out its orbit?
If you have ever worked with enginees, you would know we suck at grammar. I admit as much.
Originally posted by navy_vet_stg3
Tomorrow's headline: Former Air Force Brigadier General Commits Suicide
"Former Air Force Brigadier General, and local construction company owner was found with multiple gunshot wounds to the head, chest, and abdomen. The coroner has ruled the death a suicide. Child pornography found on his work computer during the investigation."
I don't think it would be possible to travel into the past. There is too much room for paradoxes. Travelling into the future on the other hand, I think is a real possibility
Originally posted by templar knight
Okay I accept that the monolith on Phobos was new to me - so went searching the internet:
Wikkipedia
The Discovery
I include the second link as if this structure was man -made, we should be able to see tracks leading to the monolith where the rock has been excavated out and built?
Originally posted by theshepherd2
I don't think it would be possible to travel into the past. There is too much room for paradoxes. Travelling into the future on the other hand, I think is a real possibility
Originally posted by Pervius
Identify this Spacecraft, it's not the Lunar Command Module:
Here's a hint.....the SpaceCraft in the links above with the springy tail is connected to this:
www.youtube.com...
Drops little nukes the size of soda pop cans and uses the explosions for propulsion. Neat idea. Appears to have worked well. Must have been one hell of a ride. Damn Americans and their hotrods.....