It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by captiva
reply to post by cripmeister
Again you continue to quote from a thread that is a known hoax, you said so yourself. The 2006 thread is the one that is real, is the one that is under debate and is the one mentioned by the op.
If you cant evidence your claims in the correct thread you are waisting my time.
respects
He swore at me in his IR camera thread. It was all deleted by mods within minutes, and after he started swearing at me, he started swearing at a mod. He was banned a few minutes after that.
Originally posted by captiva
reply to post by cripmeister
Point me in the direction of where DK swore at anyone in his thread....should be easy enough to do, I await patiently.
respects
I'm just now going back and reading this thread, and I'm now getting to the part where you keep calling me a troll. Look, you have NO idea what was actually said, because mods deleted posts. They didn't put the T&C agreement sign back then, they just up right made them disappear. I even had posts where I was quoting DK that were also deleted, because of his excessive profanity.
Originally posted by DeVIAS
reply to post by cripmeister
Yeah, well my point is that Travis was clearly off topic and even admitted to his posts were on the thread to disprove DK.
DK posted pictures of ufos.He did not say it was 100% proof he simply posted pics of something unidentified in the sky. DK said what type of camera and what type of lens he had. Travis kept drilling him. DK gave all info on camera and gave comparison pictures of what birds would have looked like through that lens.
Point is like I said, DK got banned for no reason. He put up pictures, and answered all replies to what camera/filter. Then got banned, when it was obvious Travis who was instigating the thread was just trying to get DK banned.
The proof of Travis being off topic and admitting to only posting to bring down DK is there. The proof DKs camera and comparison pictures of birds is there also. So again...why did DK get banned?
Originally posted by hathorschild
Hey, if something like what he described were to affect the entire globe, what's the freaking point of moving to another part of the globe?
edit on 8/28/11 by hathorschild because: spelling
Originally posted by TravisT
I'm just now going back and reading this thread, and I'm now getting to the part where you keep calling me a troll. Look, you have NO idea what was actually said, because mods deleted posts. They didn't put the T&C agreement sign back then, they just up right made them disappear. I even had posts where I was quoting DK that were also deleted, because of his excessive profanity.
Hi guys, I found the possibility of DT and DK being the same person interesting, so I ran some custom software I made for occasions like this, to do just a very simple analysis.
I let it run on about 30kb each of their major threads, and some analysis I did by hand, here are my findings. This is far from conclusive, it would require larger samples, and more thorough checking to make a serious decision, but hopefully it will be of interest.
DT mostly uses the 'reply to' or 'quote' feature when responding to people, DK appears to never or very rarely use this function. DK tends to address the person he is responding to at first instead.
DT very often starts a post with a lower case letter, DK did not do this so much.
They both use '' quotes rather than "" quotes almost all the time. DK only appeared to use "" once, this could have been a quote from someone else he used.
They both seem to use list formats of the type 1), but only DT seems to sometimes also use a list type of A)
DK uses its and im more than it's and i'm, DT never uses it's or i'm at all
They both trail sentences with a .... style quite often.
In terms of words, they both had a similar sized vocabulary, about 1300/1400 words
They both have about the same average sentence length 10/11 words per.
Personally, I do think they are different people.
Originally posted by SouthernRain55
Also...while everyone was stating that DK and Dan were one and the same...there was someone else stating the opposite (which didn't just GUESS, this person used a program to compare writing). Funny how that was pretty well ignored. This person even offered to run a full scan...nope...no one seemed to want that...*sigh*
If not however, and suspicion of DK and DT being the same person continue, I may get motivated to run a bigger more thorough analysis. There are a number of other things that tend to distinguish people that can be analysed, just it all takes time. It took quite a while to just copy and format about 10 pages worth of their posts from their major topics. If I were to do a more serious analysis, I'd want much more, and also want to compare to a 'control', ie compare in a 3 way with someone we can be sure is not them.
Again, you just don't understand it. Go look at page 7, where I said "thanks for editing your post, that was quite mean". If you notice, DK never edited any of his posts, because those were deleted/vanished. Also, he was banned around page 10 of that thread, but what you don't see at all, is when a mod came in, and told him to answer my questions with civility. DK didn't like hearing that, so he went off on the mod, me, and told everybody on ATS that he hopes we die in the dark knight, etc etc. That went on for a good 1-2 pages, but again, you don't see that, cause the mods made it disappear, or it would be a good 2 pages full of "T&C agreement" posts. You weren't there, I was. You're making judgements on things you know nothing of.
Originally posted by SouthernRain55
Originally posted by TravisT
I'm just now going back and reading this thread, and I'm now getting to the part where you keep calling me a troll. Look, you have NO idea what was actually said, because mods deleted posts. They didn't put the T&C agreement sign back then, they just up right made them disappear. I even had posts where I was quoting DK that were also deleted, because of his excessive profanity.
You said that the mod's were just deleting DK's posts and that they did not put the T&C sign up back then...but you are wrong. Here is a link from the thread you spoke of...on one of DK's posts there's the sign...
T&C Warning Pg 10
Another Example Page 6
Evidence? I guess some of you can't see what is right in front of you. If you're going to take DK's words over SkepticOverlord, well, I guess I can't help you any further. The slogan is to "deny ignorance", not embrace it. Look at DK's thread, and right under his first post, it says:
Originally posted by captiva
reply to post by Kurokage
I still await your evidence that DK was a hoaxer.
respects
edit on 26-8-2011 by SkepticOverlord because: Long overdue label of "HOAX" on this thread as it was a prank by a returning banned member.
Originally posted by captiva
reply to post by TheEnlightenedOne
I have starred your post because as you so rightly say the information in DKs legitimate 2006 thread has been seen as is coming true. I feel that some are being drawn into the hoax battle and forgetting that his thread is being evidenced as correct by the changes we are seeing in the world.
respects to you and thanks for putting me back on the straight and narrow, I see now I have been feeding the trolls.
Providing evidence is now trolling here? So when Oct 29th comes around, and nothing came the night before, will you still blindly believe DK's words?
Originally posted by captiva
respects to you and thanks for putting me back on the straight and narrow, I see now I have been feeding the trolls.
Originally posted by captiva
reply to post by TravisT
You assume my comment was of you...never assume. "I told you" is not evidence. I know Dk did not pen any other thread other than the original 2006 a confession thread. This Op is about deconstructing that thread, yet you insist on continually ignoring that same thread.
As we are both obviously talking about 2 seperate threads I dont see any value in discussion with you anymore.
respects
Who else would you be talking about? You said you wish you didn't feed the trolls, and Crip and I were the only one here to have quoted you on this page.
Originally posted by captiva
reply to post by TravisT
You assume my comment was of you...never assume.
Well, look at the "manners and decorum" sign in the IR camera thread.
"I told you" is not evidence
Why would we talk about a hoax thread, by a hoaxer? Hell, this thread should be moved to the hoax section, as it has been proven that the original was a hoax. There is no point in deconstructing something that is labeled and proven to be false. The only thing we should deconstruct, is how much of a hoax it was, cause that's the only thing worth talking about, if that. This thread shouldn't be in general conspiracies, as it was a hoax.
I know Dk did not pen any other thread other than the original 2006 a confession thread. This Op is about deconstructing that thread, yet you insist on continually ignoring that same thread.
Talking about his other threads leads into his hoaxing. But feel free to do what you want.....
As we are both obviously talking about 2 seperate threads I dont see any value in discussion with you anymore.