reply to post by Tangled4u
Not sure I put this in the right spot since i'm still getting used to the rules...Sorry
Anyways I think if we had a family like Kings and Queens with little power similar to England it would go a long way to bringing unity to the States.
The closest we had were the Kennedy's and the country was getting used to them as people to look up too.
An amendment to the Constitution to allow a vote for a King of America in name only would bring us together as a people and give us something to focus
our energy on rather than just following Brad and the thing he calls a mate.
The King would recieve no benefits from this title and have absolutely no power but he could be sent around the world as an ambassador of sorts to
help smooth any feathers that our string of recent Presidents always seem to ruffle.
For nominations we could pick the Bush family or the Clinton family but it doesn't have to be people involved in politics. For example we could elect
the Kardashians to represent us.
Thoughts?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thoughts, clearly you are a mental case, and you are not an American! You're a tory by 1600's British political party definition. You are a hater of
the United States if you can't understand the meaning of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Nor why the Declaration of Independance was signed.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights,
that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their
just powers from the consent of the governed.”
You think? Britons can't think that is why they have a King and Queen to govern them! And England is more bankrupt than the United States look at
some graphs of their economy. What are they exporting over there? The Britons that they are incompetent, the monetary system that they are apart of
has strangled away every last gene of intelligence and free-thinking that was left in their brains. You want to be like a British person tangled, with
rotting teeth and bad hygiene? And Kennedy was a royal, that is ridiculous? Why was he was shot.. British royals don't get assassinated, they set
things up so that other leaders like the Kennedy's who oppose them get assassinated. Look at what happens to great leaders in this country they all
get assassinated! *George Bush was more like a British royal, his Oil wars were a continuation of Sykes-Picot, British colonial policy and then going
into Iraq and then Afghanistan.The reason why nation was set up as a republic was so that our leaders would be elected and so that Ideas and
imagination would govern our great country. Not a Monetary system that is based on Wars set up by Usury; headed by a King and Queen that enslaves its
people.
But where says some is the king of America? I'll tell you Friend, he reigns above, and doth not make havoc of mankind like the Royal of Britain. Yet
that we may not appear to be defective even in earthly honors, let a day be solemnly set apart for proclaiming the charter; let it be brought forth
placed on the divine law, the word of God; let a crown be placed thereon, by which the world may know, that so far as we approve of monarchy, that in
America the law is king. For as in absolute governments the king is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no
other. But lest any ill use should afterwards arise, let the crown at the conclusion of the ceremony be demolished, and scattered among the people
whose right it is.
---Thomas Paine Common Sense