It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
There are definitely some thermal effects going on too with the undulation of the edge of the moon, but yes, the localized anomalies are more concentrated, like water droplets or something along those lines.
Originally posted by Phage
I was thinking in terms of refractive thermal effects of a warm lens and cool air.
Refractive effects of water droplets is a better explanation, being more localized.
by other video, are you referring to this one?
Originally posted by TheAnnouncementMovement
That was a comment about the other video with the same anomaly. They're specs of dust or something on the lense, they don't move. Only the moon moves, those objects are staying perfectly still. It's the same in both videos. But in the one I was commenting about, you can clearly see it move with the camera at around 11 seconds in.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Yes, my 2 to 1 odds means I'm 67% confident it's water droplets or something like that.
Originally posted by SupaJebusFreak
It's the Decepticons! Someone inform Optimus Prime!
Actually just saw the new movie. I like how they worked the Apollo landings conspiracies into it.
There has to be something up there going on. Why have we not gone back? Why did we set up the ISS and not put a research station on the moon? Every place man has gone we have put research stations. The sea, Antarctica, in orbit, but not the moon? Why is that? Something is up there.
Originally posted by Heliocentric
In any case, if five large objects were in natural orbit around the Moon, can I assume it would have been detected long ago?
Originally posted by TheAnnouncementMovement
You people never fail to amaze me. They follow the camera movement, they are attached to the camera or the telescope! ATS should change their motto to deny intelligence.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Just because these objects look close to the Moon doesn't mean they are it could be simply high flying birds yes something that simple.
Originally posted by alfa1
Whatever they are, they cannot be orbiting the moon.
Orbits around any object have to spend half the time above the equator and half the time below - ie they have to orbit the center of the object.
Originally posted by alfa1
But as has been pointed out its actually the moon that is drifting across the field of view, meaning that these mysterious ojects are actually quite stationary.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
There are definitely some thermal effects going on too with the undulation of the edge of the moon, but yes, the localized anomalies are more concentrated, like water droplets or something along those lines.