First of all, some of your information, as well as your interpretation of that information, is completely incorrect. You are claiming things as fact,
as well as drawing from many different happenings, trying to mold them together into some conspiracy that doesn't exist. Then you say the "debunkers"
are the ones with a problem?
Let's start with the claim that satellite data will no longer be supplied to scientists regarding near Earth objects. This was true, some years ago,
but was subsequently reversed. Not only that, but there was NEVER a large sharing of data, or any official program for such transmission. The
military, simply "playing nice," would periodically send out information to a very small percentage of scientists and organizations. They didn't do
this because they were required to. And again, they are no longer withholding any data from these scientists, and if you would have gathered data and
then made your conclusion, instead of attempting to find data to support your conclusion, you would have realized this mistake.
There are other problems with your "research," which actually shouldn't be called such, that has no foundation. I like how you make a connection
between Rex84 and comet Elenin, which has zero basis in fact. I am not even going to waste my time refuting any more of your "claims," mainly because
you, and many others, are doing their "research" incorrectly. Quit attempting to find select data to fit your hypothesis, because when you do this you
are going to make mistakes.
Instead, gather all relative data on the subject, and draw conclusions from there. It is fine that your hypothesis includes this wacky stuff, but you
cannot present a hypothesis as hard evidence. Many do not want to follow the scientific method simply because gathering oodles of data on any given
subject is time-consuming and boring. It is much more fun to pick and choose, misquote, and misrepresent select pieces of data to fit a hypothesis
that was incorrect from the beginning. Nice try, but next time why not include the research that goes against your ideas, instead of omitting that
data and presenting half-truths to the public. And trust me, it DOES exist.
edit on 7/9/11 by JiggyPotamus because: (no reason given)