It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

It's official. I found proof online that Obama was born in Hawaii just like he says he was. Newspap

page: 8
35
<< 5  6  7    9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 11:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by ..5..
reply to post by aptness
 


He doesn't pass the smell test and every lie his team throw up gets shot down.
The people are not as easy to lie to now we can share knowledge.



Go ahead, drink the Kool aid if you wish, I have had enough of it poured down my throat thank you.

If I ask for proof from my employee they should hand it over while they shout "Thank you sir may I have another."

If you ask for proof - it cannot exceed the requirements of an I-9 - which doesn't require a BC as "proof" - unless of course you're working off a set of requirements that aren't part of US law.




edit on 8-7-2011 by ..5.. because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 11:20 PM
link   
reply to post by userid1
 


I read that there are 2 distinct newspaper sections that announce birth.
One section has announcements sent by the health dept.
The other section has announcements sent in by family.

I'm thinking that if you really wanted to do some due diligence you could call the paper or email them to get a definitive answer.



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 11:41 PM
link   
reply to post by grey580
 

Actually, I'd rather you did. The idea that there would be 2 competing - and posssibly conflicting birth announcements in a single newspaper really doesn't make sense to me. Does it really make sense you?



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 11:45 PM
link   
reply to post by userid1
 


Actually yes it does.
You have an official announcement.
Then an optional announcement that could be placed in a paper by friends or family members wishing congratulations of the birth of a nephew or cousin. Or not be placed at all.
Why not.

Hell if I was a newspaper that lived on advertising I'd sure as hell want that going on for me to make money.



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 12:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by grey580
reply to post by userid1
 


Actually yes it does.
You have an official announcement.
Then an optional announcement that could be placed in a paper by friends or family members wishing congratulations of the birth of a nephew or cousin. Or not be placed at all.
Why not.

Hell if I was a newspaper that lived on advertising I'd sure as hell want that going on for me to make money.

So, which do you think the announcements cited in this thread represent? Those supplied by the DOH or the family? BTW - do you have some proof that these newspapers printed birth announcements based on family submissions in 1961?
edit on 9-7-2011 by userid1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 12:52 AM
link   
reply to post by userid1
 


Seeing as how the announcements are all in the same format.
Something that you would not see if all those peoples families inserted their own announcements in the paper.

I'd say that it's obviously, and look at the image to confirm this, the announcements were issued by the health dept.



And no I'm going by what others have posted via links to websites.
However if you wanted to call and find out the history of those announcements you could call the newspapers and find out.
Though I'm pretty satisfied that isn't necessary. All the announcements are in the same format. Obviously there would be differences in the wording if family members wrote their owned announcements.
edit on 9-7-2011 by grey580 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 01:12 AM
link   
Lost my train of thought - possibly forever. Well, there's always alcohol!

edit on 9-7-2011 by userid1 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 08:52 AM
link   

Originally posted by userid1
Lost my train of thought - possibly forever. Well, there's always alcohol!

edit on 9-7-2011 by userid1 because: (no reason given)


So that is what you mix with your kool aid.
Explains why you believe the lies.

Perhaps you should dry out and take a sober look at the person you are defending so staunchly.
edit on 9-7-2011 by ..5.. because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 08:53 AM
link   
reply to post by ..5..
 


Be nice.
No need for that.



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 10:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by ..5..

Originally posted by userid1
Lost my train of thought - possibly forever. Well, there's always alcohol!

edit on 9-7-2011 by userid1 because: (no reason given)


So that is what you mix with your kool aid.
Explains why you believe the lies.

Perhaps you should dry out and take a sober look at the person you are defending so staunchly.
edit on 9-7-2011 by ..5.. because: (no reason given)


I'm not defending the "person", I'm reciting the facts - which you seem to be in short supply of...



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 11:13 AM
link   

Originally posted by TheOneElectric
Thank you for your effort, sir. However, you've seen the mental gymnastics these people do to justify their...their...their whatever. I don't know what their problem is, but it has something to do with the man himself, and not his politics or party affiliation.



oh, imagine having a problem with the "man" himself, the very idea of it!

For every president people have issues with the "man"


Settle yourself, yeah
edit on 9-7-2011 by blueorder because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 11:18 AM
link   
reply to post by userid1
 


Hope your hangover isn't too painful.


Made up fact thrown out to the public like bones aren't enough to explain away all the missing records and documents.
Fact me this
Why is obamas kinder garden records the only one missing in his class? I speculate because it had a copy of his actual birth certificate and on it is something so damning people might kill to conceal it.

There are a 'lot' of other things that are too 'just not right' to overlook.



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 12:14 PM
link   
reply to post by ..5..
 


Since when do your kindergarten records have a copy of your birth certificate "attached" to them? It sounds like a fun theory and all but like most birther theories, it kind of sounds like you just imagined it.



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 02:04 PM
link   
Greetings, Grey580,

Re: ..."meaningful response..." Certainly. You win. Cass Sunstein wins, and has much to be so very proud of.

And so it is. The case is finally closed. The far left has achieved a glorious victory that will be long remembered.
Ordinary Americans who have so disrespectfully been labeled as "birthers" (for simply asking the question) are being silenced. The Main Stream Media should present you with an award for investigative journalism. Mr. soetoro can never, ever, be prosecuted for fraud, espionage, passport fraud, identity theft, or any other "dreadful" charges appropriate to an usurper. Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals, have served the far left exactly as planned.

Now that it's all over, may I ask any member of Cass Sunstein's staff
just a few closeout questions? May I?

In light of the conclusive findings in this message thread, why was it even necessary to have the AP employee forge up a long form birth certificate as described here? Why wasn't a Mexican drug cartel contracted to counterfeit a "long form" birth certificate (given that they do supurb jobs publishing passports, green cards, voter registration cards)?

Mr. Sunstein* , was the "long form" [PDF "birth certificate" document release] a coordinated effort between yourself, Gov. Romney, and Mr. Trump to have Mr. Trump confound the next election (by running 3rd party) in order to assure a soetoro victory? Mr. Sunstein, may I ask, how will Gov. Romney and Mr. Trump be rewarded after Mr. soetoro's upcoming glorious victory?

Now that the [place of birth] case is officially closed, answers will be graciously appreciated.

Again, what I'm asking are just close-out questions. And, so, for those inclined to flame me for posting this, please do, I encourage it. Will it do any good for the party? Nope, I'm nothing more than an ordinary citizen; I have no power, no political influence, no nothing. Character assassinate me? Sure. Do it as you see fit.

Oh, by the way, there's no such word as "birther!"

Have a nice day.


* Referring to Mr. Sunstein* himself or any of his employees who monitor this website.

edit on 9/7/11 by Adonsa because: Removed typo from 4th paragraph, first line.



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 04:51 PM
link   
reply to post by Kitilani
 


All of his true record are either ommitted, deleted or missing, neither he nor his wife are eligible to practice law since before his run for president and yet he is still unquestionably supported by ...I don't know who but obviously there are a lot of them (or the results are not true) for all I know his supporteres are software programs with names and the ability to vote.

All the deleted records, the sudden family deaths (no one to corner and ask) questionable origins, people in his supposed class that can't remember him being there but they rememer the other students, nothing raises a flag to anyone?



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 05:03 PM
link   
reply to post by ..5..
 


So...
...never then?

Thank you. I did not think there was any truth to what you had said. I just like seeing you admit that.



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 05:43 PM
link   
reply to post by Kitilani
 


Throw all the mud you want peole liek you have allowed a non person to become the suppsed head of the US.

Dead people are more eligible to be president than he is. People on the wittness protection plan have a more solid backgroud tan he doezs and their is based on 100% lies.

Come up with 30% of what a potential solider in the US armywould have to...Barak H. Obama can't or won't and yet he made president. I have asked around subtly and less than 10% of the people asked voted for him. Considering the potential for fraud ala box 13 just why was he elected when the voting numbers could have been altered with a flip of a switch?*.

I would like to dissaccociate myself from this walking ghost with no past that the country calls a president.

He (as portrayed) does not (at the higher levels**) exist and is not for multiple concrete reasons eligilble to be president.

* Note the electronic voting machine errors (past threads- been done to death).

** He could never get a security clearance because his records would have to exist- the don't, His classmates would have to remember him - they can't, He when to school and those records are sealed in concrete- His past submitted, theses cannot be found (not even a xerox of one), he is unremembered by his classmates.



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 05:43 PM
link   
reply to post by Kitilani
 


Throw all the mud you want peole liek you have allowed a non person to become the suppsed head of the US.

Dead people are more eligible to be president than he is. People on the wittness protection plan have a more solid backgroud tan he doezs and their is based on 100% lies.

Come up with 30% of what a potential solider in the US armywould have to...Barak H. Obama can't or won't and yet he made president. I have asked around subtly and less than 10% of the people asked voted for him. Considering the potential for fraud ala box 13 just why was he elected when the voting numbers could have been altered with a flip of a switch?*.

I would like to dissaccociate myself from this walking ghost with no past that the country calls a president.

He (as portrayed) does not (at the higher levels**) exist and is not for multiple concrete reasons eligilble to be president.

* Note the electronic voting machine errors (past threads- been done to death).

** He could never get a security clearance because his records would have to exist- the don't, His classmates would have to remember him - they can't, He when to school and those records are sealed in concrete- His past submitted, theses cannot be found (not even a xerox of one), he is unremembered by his classmates.



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 06:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by MrWendal
I do not see what the big deal is. It is the birth announcement that was listed in the newspaper. No one that I know of has disputed that the birth was announced in a newspaper, but that does not prove that Obama was born in Hawaii. It proves his birth was announced in a Hawaiian Newspaper.

and before you go on the attack, you should probably know I am not a "birther".



... And how many people do you know that have their child birth announced in a different countries news paper???

Come one, how about some common sense.... Either he was born in Hawaii or this is the deepest most complex plan ever. A conspiracy that goes back to before he was even born.... And it would be stupid... If that were the case, why not just pick a baby who is a citizen?

This birther conspiracy, truly makes NO sense what so ever.....

What so ever.



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 09:16 PM
link   
reply to post by ..5..
 


You are just rambling. You really are. I asked a very specific question and it seems to have set something else off. You can ramble all you like. It is interesting to read and some is entertaining but none of it has anything to do with reality so I hate to tell you that hitting reply on my post and then scribbling out half thoughts is not going to change anything or convince anyone who cares enough to think or research.

Now I know better than to ask a specific question about statements you make though so at least I learned that, right?



new topics

top topics



 
35
<< 5  6  7    9 >>

log in

join