Israeli Settler Terrorists Are At It Again

reply to post by CountDrac

Why should the Israelis treat the Palestinians different then kadafi to the Libyans, or Asad the Syrians, or the Iranian regime to its people.

Because the land and the people do not belong to Israel so WHY should Israel have ANY control over them??

reply to post by backinblack


Your comment is the stupidest thing I ever heard. Does Kadafi own the land in Libya and deserve to kill his people and rape the woman. Does Asad have a right to be a dictator in Syria?

And last time i looked its called israel and its a jewish country that was recognized by the UN. Deal with it...

The palestinians have no right and no country until the UN decides they do, so until then they can eat dirt and complain all they want...

reply to post by CountDrac


Read resolution 242, 338 and most importantly 1397 which recalls resolution 242 and 338, calling for a two state solution meaning a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza under the pre-June 1967 borders. So yes the UN has decided they have rights- therefor does that mean you now support a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza?

reply to post by backinblack





Yes the resolution said a two state solution but the stupid Arabs decided to attack israel and lost. Tough luck...

Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by CountDrac

 

Why should the Israelis treat the Palestinians different then kadafi to the Libyans, or Asad the Syrians, or the Iranian regime to its people.

Because the land and the people do not belong to Israel so WHY should Israel have ANY control over them??

but they DO have control, right? besides, you think it's ok the way they treat there OWN people?

duh!

i don't know how israel put's up with it.

sampson slew a 1000 philistines with the jaw bone of an ass, you guys are doing the same to this thread.

reply to post by CountDrac


Buddy resolution 1397 was passed in 2002 not before 1967. I think you are talking about the UN partition plan which does not recall resolution 242 and 338 as they did not exist till after 1967. Tough luck the Palestinians do have rights, now are you going to accept them or are you going to decide the UN is irrelevant now as it does not serve Israel in its conquest of the West Bank?

reply to post by fooks


Hallelujah someone with a brain on this thread…

reply to post by SpeachM1litant


Sorry the palestinians and israelis didnt accept it and both sides didnt want to take the deal. So they didnt get a state and currently the UN does not recognize Palestine. Buddy...

Sure. someone with a brain "like yours" that says things like this as if it's a fact.

sampson slew a 1000 philistines with the jaw bone of an ass,

reply to post by backinblack


Your comment is the stupidest thing I ever heard. Does Kadafi own the land in Libya and deserve to kill his people and rape the woman. Does Asad have a right to be a dictator in Syria?

So if they are Arab they have the right to act like animals to their own people?

in that case israel is too soft on the palestinians...

reply to post by CountDrac


Um the Palestinians didn't accept the UN partition plan, but they have accepted resolution 242, 338 and 1397. It does not matter if Israel hasn't accepted any of these (even though it accepted resolution 242 and 338 as the basis of final status talks), it is still binding on Israel as a member of the UN and a signee of the UN charter. Buddy, you can't escape the law.

reply to post by CountDrac

Sorry the palestinians and israelis didnt accept it and both sides didnt want to take the deal. So they didnt get a state and currently the UN does not recognize Palestine. Buddy...

Just because the UN doesn't recognize Palestine at present doesn't mean the land therefore belongs to Israel..

You seem to quote the UN so why not quote the UN recognized Israeli BORDERS ???

reply to post by backinblack


Guys you are contradicting yourself. Either we go by the UN or not, im getting confused…

The UN doesn't recognize Palestine currently sorry.

Originally posted by backinblack
Sure. someone with a brain "like yours" that says things like this as if it's a fact.

sampson slew a 1000 philistines with the jaw bone of an ass,

heck, i wasn't there and no one i know was either.

untill he got his mullet he was a pretty bad dude.


lol, i could have made it sound worse with that analogy.

i went easy on you guys.



beware, david peg.

ATTENTION ALL

Please keep it civil (in other words let's avoid the use of "stupid") and avoid racism.

16) Behavior: You will not behave in an abusive, libelous, defamatory, hateful, intolerant, bigoted and/or racist manner, and will not harass, threaten, nor attack anyone.

Civil and on topic.

Thank you.

reply to post by CountDrac

Guys you are contradicting yourself. Either we go by the UN or not, im getting confused…

The UN doesn't recognize Palestine currently sorry.

I'll go by the UN, where have I said otherwise??
More BS lies from you I see..

Now, where is the UN recognized Israeli borders?
And now that you favor the UN, let's recall all the UN resolutions against Palestine and Israel including the ones vetoed by their mates in the WH..

reply to post by CountDrac


CountDrac, you are contradicting yourself. There is currently no Palestinian state, but the UN has recognized the right of a Palestinian state under resolution 1397 which calls for a two state solution in accordance with resolution 242 and 338- meaning a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza.

If you "are going by the UN" then Israel must adhere to the UN charter and UN security council resolution 242 and 338. Stop contradicting yourself.

reply to post by backinblack


why are you answering your first statement.
Does Kadafi own the land in Libya and deserve to kill his people and rape the woman. Does Asad have a right to be a dictator in Syria? if they are Arab they have the right to act like animals to their own people?

reply to post by SpeachM1litant


A resolution was passed but the specifics were not agreed on by either side (israeli or palestinian) hence a state was never created. MOVE ON…

reply to post by CountDrac


What are you talking about. Israel is a signee of the UN charter and a member state of the UN therefor they are legaly obligated to adhere to both the charter and the resolution. The Palestinian authority agreed to a Palestinian state on the internationally recognized border (the pre-June 1967 borders). I thought you were "go(ing) by the UN". It is nice to see that the UN is void only when it dosen't support your argument.