It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MrGrimm
reply to post by newcovenant
That is an observation at best, you have no evidence supporting your argument.
And that's goes for everyone here who claims not spanking a child, when they endanger their lives or the lives of others, is unneccessary.
Originally posted by dolphinfan
A felony? This woman gets a felony conviction for giving her kid a typical spanking?
But what right does this judge think that he can tell this woman not to mildly spank her child?
Spanking a child mildly is an effective tool in teaching disciplining a child. Certainly it should be used after other methods are attempted, but giving a kid a swat on the kiester is not child abuse and certainly should not be considered a felony.
The kid was not harmed, the kid was taken to the hospital and no injury observed.
The entire business was brought forth by the paternal grandmother? Is it likely that there is a bit of bad blood between the two? Absolutely.
If we had our kids totally doped up on drugs the way the elite would prefer there would not be any misbehaving, so perhaps the solution to not get convicted of a felony when, after other methods of displine fail, you give your kid a spanking.
www.volunteertv.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by SteveR
There's something wrong with the parenting if violence is required.
Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by newcovenant
You can slap a child of any age who goes near the hot stove but you are only training like a Pavlovs dog. They never know why they don't go near the stove but true enough they won't.
Isn't it a little stupid (and to a child especially so) to harm a child to keep it from harming itself?
Instead of slapping a child for your own inability to monitor their behavior and keep them away from danger - it would be better to keep the child protectively held in a crib or play pen until they are old enough to explore.
Soon they will be mature enough to sense and observe that stove themselves. If they do not quickly figure the stove is hot and they will burn themselves on it without you telling them, it is a necessary and critical indicator you have a developmentally handicapped child.
Sugar makes children irritable, chaotic and unruly too so if you have behavioral problems you could be bringing them on yourself. Take away the drug effects of the sugar and you might just keep their attention for a few minutes at a time to teach them something.
You don't have kids do you? Keep a child in a crib or a playpen until they have learned that stoves are hot? What!!! How precisely will they learn that sitting in a crib? and to suggest that if if they cannot learn that for themselves without any experience of being either burned themselves or being told by the parent that it is a critical indicator of a developmentally challenged child is an incredibly ignorant assumption and totally wrong. And how would they independently learn about road safety from their crib or playpen?
I think you're just making arguments up for the sake of it, and notably you replied to yourself in your last post! I wonder what arguing with yourself is an indicator of?
Originally posted by bricmpt
Originally posted by SteveR
There's something wrong with the parenting if violence is required.
I know, right. I see all those other mammals on documentaries scolding their offspring with little nips and swats and I think "What is wrong with the mammals?" We are clearly doomed if we don't get our act together and stop dominating and correcting our offspring.
Despite recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics against spanking, most parents in the United States approve of and have used corporal punishment as a form of child discipline. The study suggests that even minor forms of corporal punishment increase the risk for child aggressive behaviour.
Other than the occasional cuff to change direction, even animals do not teach by spanking their young or using pain and humiliation as tools at their disposal. It is laughable.
Originally posted by Horza
Originally posted by Greensage
I am absolutely floored! We can kill adults but we cannot spank a child?
This has got to stop! It is high time punishment for wrong-doing becomes the norm! Personally I would pull that Judge's pants down and spank him myself! Publicly!
The reason why we kill adults is because we spank children.
edit on 18/6/11 by Horza because: (no reason given)
And as for keeping them in a crib or playpen til they're at least 4