It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bhornbuckle75
reply to post by FreeSpeaker
The problem here is that you are showing evidence of individual studies in the past...studies which were done in a limited fashion, and then over with rather quickly. I have no problem believing such an experiment could be done today.....However Chemtrails believers suggest an ONGOING, LONG TERM manipulation of the atmosphere, of the entirety of N.America or more (the effects of the manipulation seems to differ from believer to believer).
To suggest these tests from yesteryear have any resemblance to what 'chemtrailers' believe is quite a huge stretch...the difference in scale make them quite unlike the alleged chemtrail conspiracy....It's like documenting cases of schoolyard fist fights, and then trying to use it as evidence of a civil war.
Originally posted by adeclerk
Originally posted by FreeSpeaker
Most really be something damaging in those reports.
I would really hate if terrorists got their hands on the reports from those programs, it would detail exactly how biological agents can spread, and provide a wealth of information that would allow them to hurt many people.
Use some critical thinking.
Originally posted by FreeSpeaker
I have already stated I don't believe in a global chemtrail conspiracy. The point of this thread was to prove chemtrails do exist because they were used in Dew&LAC. Too many debunkers are calling people stupid in this forum simply because they believe in the existance of chemtrails. They DO exist.
The great debate is are they currently being used?
There is not one debunker here who can state for certain that a chemtrail can't behave and look like a contrail because the only footage of such activity taking place, that we know of, is classified by the army.
Originally posted by FreeSpeaker
Originally posted by adeclerk
Originally posted by FreeSpeaker
Most really be something damaging in those reports.
I would really hate if terrorists got their hands on the reports from those programs, it would detail exactly how biological agents can spread, and provide a wealth of information that would allow them to hurt many people.
Use some critical thinking.
What, you don't think the russians or chinese have tested this for themselves?
If the USA can't keep its nuclear secrets safe from the russians and chinese its safe to say they already know what they need to know. Info is easily bought from both russia and china.
Try some critical thinking for yourself.edit on 12-6-2011 by FreeSpeaker because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
so ther must be some evidence to show that?
Or are you using BSBray's defintion of a chemtrail is anything at all that an a/c puts into the atmosphere??
How do we know this footage exists in the first place?
Originally posted by adeclerk
Right, but I was talking about terrorist organizations, not legitimate governments. Do you want them to release the results at the expense of your safety?
Originally posted by FreeSpeaker
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
so ther must be some evidence to show that?
Sigh
Re-read my posted info on DewII & LAC. The US army admitted spraying chemicals over populations to test the effectiveness of bio warfare. Spraying of chemicals from aircraft would mean chemtrails.
How do we know this footage exists in the first place?
Do really think the US army wouldn't document such a operation? What the hell would the point of it be if they didn't document and study their work
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Making such information available to anti-US terrorists would inevitably lead to it becoming available to all terrorists world wide.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
But when someone says that it IS happening now I am always going to ask for evidence, and say exactly what I think of the quality of that evidence.
Sure - just like the Brits did & some video from that is available on YT.
Originally posted by Uncinus
Hmm, how much detail could you actually see? It does not sound like it was that high.
Anything like this?
Originally posted by FreeSpeaker
Originally posted by adeclerk
Right, but I was talking about terrorist organizations, not legitimate governments. Do you want them to release the results at the expense of your safety?
I said the info can easily be bought from either the chinese or russians. China could care less if terrorists attacked the USA and russia has had dealings with the taliban for a long time. This info is also over 50 years old and has already probably been stolen.
Originally posted by FreeSpeaker
Sure - just like the Brits did & some video from that is available on YT.
Well, I guess the Brits project has nothing to hide in the way of chemicals that damage health.
Originally posted by HenryPatrick
The chemtrail debunkers should be completely and totally ignored. They only give science about contrails, which are not the same thing. That is like me trying to start a conversation about baseball, and a bunch of people chime in with football stats while pretending that what they are saying has anything to do at all with the argument at hand. For the simple reason they are arguing about something totally different than chemtrails, the same-old debunkers should be ignored time and time again. Their presence should simply not even be acknowleged, like a lowly gnat.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by FreeSpeaker
Sure - just like the Brits did & some video from that is available on YT.
Well, I guess the Brits project has nothing to hide in the way of chemicals that damage health.
They were using exactly the same flouorescing material - zinc cadmium sulphide - as mentioned in your initial post.
Bacterial agents used included e.coli, bacillus globigii and "serratia marcescens bacteria, with an anthrax simulant and phenol" - I don't know how/if they are related to the agents used in hte USE.
The Guardian newspaper published this article on it in 2002 -www.guardian.co.uk...
Originally posted by adeclerk
Originally posted by FreeSpeaker
Originally posted by adeclerk
Right, but I was talking about terrorist organizations, not legitimate governments. Do you want them to release the results at the expense of your safety?
I said the info can easily be bought from either the chinese or russians. China could care less if terrorists attacked the USA and russia has had dealings with the taliban for a long time. This info is also over 50 years old and has already probably been stolen.
Great, so you're saying that like your claim that there must be something suspicious in it, this claim is also unfalsifiable. Logical fallacy.