It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"That's a pretty weak excuse and argument pal. The verse quoted WAS about Jesus's return to earth during the second advent. Just because you don't understand the Bible nor what is in it, doesn't mean you should ignore every verse in the Bible that was wrote when Jesus wasn't walking around in the flesh. You have much to
learn. MUCH.
The comment on the united nations not being in the Bible isn't even worth comment on my part"
Your hypothesis describes the AC.
The sword refers to the Word of God.
Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
reply to post by teapot
Your hypothesis describes the AC.
It does not.
The AC will be a major political figure controlling an army/technology. The AC will not fight for the sake of a religion. The hypothetical "guerilla Jesus" would be the exact opposite, in the sense that he will be religious and will fight for a religious cause.
But then there are places when he clearly meant a literal sword whether or not he endorsed violence, like when he asked them to sell their cloak and buy a sword and when he implied that he would bring the opposite of peace. (Note that he goes on to talk of divisions between people)
If sword was symbolic of the word of God, then Jesus, could have simply said so.
Please note that Jesus used violence when he deemed it necassary... like when he physically threw out the money changers. This goes with the hypothetical "guerilla" Jesus of the OP, who wages a war against irreligious forces (of the AC).
Originally posted by sk0rpi0n
...to be labelled and identified as a terrorist, insurgent, rebel etc.?
(First read these two quotes....
1. Quote 1...
"I come not to bring peace, but to bring a sword" (Matthew 10:34)
Ask yourselves honestly... will you simply dismiss this as being symbolic or metaporical? Do you think certain christian groups would not have brought this up in their arguments against a certain other prophet?
2. Quote 2...
Then Jesus asked them, "When I sent you without purse, bag or sandals, did you lack anything?" "Nothing," they answered. He said to them, "But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don't have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. It is written: `And he was numbered with the transgressors' ; and I tell you that this must be fulfilled in me. Yes, what is written about me is reaching its fulfillment." The disciples said, "See, Lord, here are two swords." "That is enough," he replied. (Luke 22:35-38)
Note that jesus insisted that they buy a sword...and the disciples did not seem surprised upon hearing that, and simply replied that they have two.)
What if it was Mohammad whp said these words?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ok now, imagine that we are futher in the end times have begun.
Imagine a scenario where current events have escalated. Pakistan has become the next major flashpoint. Islam is continued to be viewed as a threat by both christians and irreligious people.
More regimes are overthrown... the turmoil in the middle east continues.
Current wars continue to grind on with no end in sight. All we see on the MSM are more lies and deceptions by TPTB. Events have occured (perhaps, a major natural disaster or a strange natural phenomena not yet experienced by our generation) that change the way of life as we understand it. Meanwhile, Western and European nations continue to witness the decay of christian culture and the rise of an irreligious national lifestyle.
One of half of the world is a place where societies allow religion to mauled open in the name of "secularism" and "free speech", but in the other half..., those who take up arms for a religious beliefs are labelled as a threat to the civilized world...as "insurgents" or "terrorists". There suddenly appears a skilled guerilla warfare commander... who will be labelled by the MSM as an "islamist terrorist". He will be extremely religious. He will fight for his religious beliefs against a government/ruling authority that is far from religious. He would be portrayed in the media as a typical islamic extremist. Beard, turban, AK, RPG... the works.
And then... this character turns out to be none other than.... Jesus Christ.
How would you all react?
edit on 10-5-2011 by sk0rpi0n because: (no reason given)edit on 10-5-2011 by sk0rpi0n because: (no reason given)
edit : I had to modify the title. Serious reponses only.edit on 10-5-2011 by sk0rpi0n because: (no reason given)edit on 10-5-2011 by sk0rpi0n because: (no reason given)
And then shall appear the sign of the Son of man in heaven: and then shall all the tribes of the earth mourn, and they shall see the Son of man coming in the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. Matthew 24:30
Jesus said to him, "It is as you said. Nevertheless, I say to you, hereafter you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of the Power, and coming on the clouds of heaven." Matthew 26:64
Then they will see the Son of Man coming in the clouds with great power and glory. Mark 13:26
Behold, He is coming with clouds, and every eye will see Him, even they who pierced Him. And all the tribes of the earth will mourn because of Him. Even so, Amen. Revelations 1:7
I cannot agree with this. The AC will be low-born, enter a place of worship, ie a religion, subvert it and find within in it, many worshipers. Once the AC achieves ascendancy amongst the nations by acts of war that remove the people of God who cause so much distress and opposition by speaking Truth, he will demand worship from all the peoples of the Earth.
The Bible recounts how Jesus was moved to ire, turned over the tables of the money-changers and ejected them from the Temple courtyards. It does not allude to physical violence toward the person. The Bible also refers to comments that Jesus did not speak as the scribes and pharisees but rather as a man of authority. Again, speach, the power of the Word.
I seriously don't see Jesus needing an RPG, or a turban for that matter...may wear one for the nostalgia factor though.