It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Thepreye
reply to post by Annee
The fear of criminality was the fear I was referring to, I have no such fear therefor don't call for a ban on face covering and I try to argue against those that make such a call, my prerogative.
Originally posted by Annee
I suppose - - I could even take the position that covering your face in public infringes on the rights of others.
Originally posted by marinesniper0351
reply to post by wingsfan
Amen to your comments, I have told my own family members if you dislike it here is the US so much and you are always praising your country of birth like Iran, than I see no reason why you should not move back...?
Then they change the content to well America is the land of the free etc...and detract from why they left their wonderful country to begin with.
Blend in, enjoy a different culture...I am Muslim/Persian/American and speak English, Farsi, Spanish and some Portuguese...
« Le secrétaire général de l'Elysée, Claude Guéant, a estimé de même sur Europe 1 que le port du voile intégral ne s'inscrivait pas dans une volonté d'intégration en France. "On peut imaginer par exemple que, pour entrer dans la nationalité française ou dans un dispositif d'intégration, on ne porte pas le voile intégral", a-t-il dit lors de l'émission Le Grand Rendez-vous. »
« le porte-parole de l'UMP Frédéric Lefebvre a souhaité l'"interdiction de l'accès à un certain nombre de droits" aux femmes portant le voile intégral, citant les "prestations sociales", les "allocations familiales" et les "titres de transport public". "Quand on ne respecte pas ses devoirs, on n'a pas à avoir accès aux droits. Les droits et les devoirs, dans la République, ça compte", a déclaré le porte-parole du parti présidentiel lors du point-presse hebdomadaire au siège de l'UMP. »
Originally posted by Thepreye
Originally posted by Annee
I suppose - - I could even take the position that covering your face in public infringes on the rights of others.
I can see how you could take that position but I can't see how it has merit, what rights of others are infringed.
Originally posted by jimmyx
Originally posted by marinesniper0351
reply to post by wingsfan
Amen to your comments, I have told my own family members if you dislike it here is the US so much and you are always praising your country of birth like Iran, than I see no reason why you should not move back...?
Then they change the content to well America is the land of the free etc...and detract from why they left their wonderful country to begin with.
Blend in, enjoy a different culture...I am Muslim/Persian/American and speak English, Farsi, Spanish and some Portuguese...
yup, you sound and think like an american, no matter what your cultural heritage is, and that is what this country is about. good post.
Originally posted by jimmyx
Originally posted by Thepreye
Originally posted by Annee
I suppose - - I could even take the position that covering your face in public infringes on the rights of others.
I can see how you could take that position but I can't see how it has merit, what rights of others are infringed.
i have been to 3 casinos here in california, and you are required to pull down the hood on a "hoodie" sweatshirt while in the casino, so it doesn't cover your face...apparently they have stricter security concerns than france does.
Originally posted by Thepreye
Originally posted by Annee
I suppose - - I could even take the position that covering your face in public infringes on the rights of others.
I can see how you could take that position but I can't see how it has merit, what rights of others are infringed.
Tried to capture what it's like looking through the mesh but in fact the holes are much bigger to your eyes and because you're in stereo, the netting is semi-transparent. So while you can see the netting, you see much better than this out of it.
For the woman under a veil, it is a strong sense of security. If the world around her considered it normal, it would in fact be a very nice feeling. Here where it is a dramatically weird thing the safety is much eroded.
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
My actual issue though is with people who cry about the state of our governments and then support the crazy things like this that just make them all the more powerful and all the more intrusive.
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by PurpleDog UK
I can understand banning any form of face covering for security reasons but not based on religion..
I mean you can't wear a helmet into a bank or many other buildings..
But to ban Muslim veils when people can still walk around in hoodies,scarfs and sunglasses is not right IMO..
Originally posted by jimmyx
i have been to 3 casinos here in california, and you are required to pull down the hood on a "hoodie" sweatshirt while in the casino, so it doesn't cover your face...apparently they have stricter security concerns than france does.
Originally posted by beezzer
They (muslims) KILLED people because someone burned a koran.
You folks don't think they'll get all bent out of shape over this? I'm just glad I don't live in Paris.