It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by WhizPhiz
Well, I liked the video and it was definitely inspirational...but their entire website is a money making charade imo...
Originally posted by MountainLaurel
reply to post by IAMIAM
Your quite an idealist ! Power to you Brother......you have many obstacles before you. I watched a very interesting documentory about the Zeitgeist movement called " Moving Forward " although some beautiful, and possibly brilliant ideas......it leaves me skeptical...especially because of my mistrust of the trickery being used to create a NWO.......it's a veiled threat to say it's happening, so why not join peacefully !!!
On February 17, 1950, James Paul Warburg confidently declared to the United States Senate: “We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent.”
Originally posted by DocEmrick
Originally posted by davidgrouchy
Your opinion doesn't count as valid research. When you're ready to tango with an intellectual come back and talk to me. Until then, I regard your posts as pure comedy.
Originally posted by JakesterL
Who will be the champions of those poor child molesters, or the defenders of those DUI offenders? Let’s give the cigarette smokers their rights back and allow them to once again rejoin society. Who cries for the rapists, the bank robbers and the violent gang members? Let’s open the prisons and allow our less than perfect brothers and sisters, to once again take their places among us.
Originally posted by KrypticCriminal
Ive been reading your posts closely and i agree with everything you've said so far. I just have one question for you.
Do you feel that science and technology has a role once the system falls?
I know this is one of the fundamental factors in the zeitgiest movements ideology, A vision which you may not share. I just feel it would be a waste of one of mankinds greatest conquests if it didn't have its place.
The problem with the zietgiest movements "Resource based Economy" is its too massive in scale. There talking about a massive overhaul of the entire planet, where each country simply hands its resources over to the centralised control system. It also calls for the demolishing and rebuilding of entire citys which in itself would put a massive strain on what resources we have left.
So what if someone developed a maths based algorythmic system which could control a village first. Removing the need for beaurocracy or a man/woman at the top saying this should be done this way and when. Once this sytem has been tested and proven to work you scale it up to a city. Then link those citys to regulate a country. Then linking countrys to regulate the world. At first encumpassing the monetary sytem. ei. this country needs oil and so it orders it from another country etc. etc. Untill the system is so efficient that it ends the need for man/woman to be involved in the sytem at all. Stripping both the responsability and power from those who have all the influence today. Once this is in place then were all free from the chains of the monetary system and are free to pursue our spiritual and interlectual goals.
I know this is crude explanation but you get my point. What are your thoughts.
Originally posted by KrypticCriminal
Thanks for your reply and yet again i find myself in complete agreement. Personaly my energy and effort would be available to do whatever was required in this new sytem. As long as my basic needs are catered for. Then what more could i ask.
This still brings us back full circle to the fall of the present system. I personaly would be willing to completely reject this current sytem. Im even willing to set it to the date that you put forward in your other thread. I cant help but feel that it will be you and i alone though. While most are in agreement with the idea. Im not hearing any resounding yes's. How will the movement keep in contact to check who's in and who's out. How do i know it wont be just me wandering the streets looking for a place to sleep while i wait for everyone else to make their decision. Part of me feels that the experience of doing this alone will help me grow in spirit. Im just not sure how to get my message to others when im on the outside looking in.
Maybe were too far ahead of our time. Maybe we should wait for a perfect oppotunity when people are looking for a better way. A time which best illustrates our point that the old ways are'nt working. Maybe the next banking crisis or global reccesion, which cant be too far away. Meanwhile reaching as many people as we can in the meantime.
I dont think im prepared enough for whats to come yet, and i dont think theres enough people to make the change.
Originally posted by KrypticCriminal
reply to post by IAMIAM
Some homless guy standing on the street corner preaching has been done and is a great source of amusement to many. It is something that i would be willing to do if i thought it would make any difference. The main stream media has already hard wired people in to believing those who do this are crazy and should not be taken seriously.
I think we need to be more organised than that. As a preperation we should develop a network so people in a certain area know and can get in touch with others in their area. Then those who are on board can all come together when the time arrives and move as one. This will draw more attention to us and our cause and it will allow for people to support one another.
Then we could gather all those who are already outside the system ei. the homeless by moving around the city to the various missions or where ever the homeless people maybe. All the time spreading our message and gaining support. Then Each group from each city should have a specified area were they can congregate. Protest peacefully and again support one another. Then we could focus on getting our message to the masses. Hopefully we'd attract media attention which we could use to reach a wider audience. The Authorities will step in to shut us down bringing more exposure to our cause. We'd have to be ready to get a clear message out at this critical moment as TPTB will make us appear crazy by manipulation of the media.
Together we stand, divided we fall. We cant appear to be a cult, thats very important. We cant allow for any kind of fear mongering. As our numbers swell. Revelution will come ever closer. We just need to make sure everything is in place for a smooth transition. Then will come the upheaval.
I think we should start to undertake public services as a sign of our intentions. Picking up litter or cleaning up green spaces. Setting an example of what we hope to achieve.
Ive babbled on enough but with some planning in place this might just be possible.
Originally posted by 0zzymand0s
reply to post by KrypticCriminal
He does make several good points, but the one that stuck out for me was the copyright issue. US Copyright law specifically contains provisions for fair use, in reviewing, or for derivative works or works of satire. That doesn't mean that there isn't a conspiracy here, but it does mean that use of less then 25 seconds of copyrighten works is protected under "fair use" provisions.
,We aren't to accept just what people says. We,have the right to find out all truth and facts. Also our constitution,we want to follow also,and our government should too. Thank you for this video.
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence,[note 1] promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. ” Meaning and application The Preamble serves solely as an introduction, and does not assign powers to the federal government,[1] nor does it provide specific limitations on government action. Due to the Preamble's limited nature, no court has ever utilized it as a decisive factor in case adjudication,[2] except as regards frivolous litigation.[3]