It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In the garden of Eden, there were two choices, one was knowledge, and the other was life. Knowledge is what we have today, Life is what we could have had where there would have been no sorrow, hate, war, violence, and so on. It would have been perfect, we would be able to talk to God directly, and He would have been among us.
The temptation of knowledge is for us to become vain, and arrogant and wanting to be as gods to control our own destiny and knowing what good and evil is, do you understand my meaning, no harmony.
In fact if Lucifer could destroy man, than that would include the earth, another one of God's creation.
Have you ever been tempted to do something you knew wasn't the right thing to do?
Believing that one is more superior or better than others, doesn't that qualify as vanity?
Satan(Lucifer) is not interested in the preservation of the earth or mankind. He is also doomed to damnation. Why would he care about the earth? The earth is God's creation, and Satan despises everything that God created.
God set a time line for creation after the fall of man. Satan is allowed only a certain time period to tempt man.
After the time line has come to a close, Satan will be cast into the lake of fire
There are no myths in creation
Originally posted by mysticnoon
reply to post by hawaii50th
Have you ever been tempted to do something you knew wasn't the right thing to do?
Oh, most certainly, but that is a vastly different situation to that of Adam and Eve.
Temptations only arise under the influence of the ego-desires, namely lust, pride, greed, and so forth. I assume Adam and Eve were free of desires prior to making their initial choice, so there was nothing from which a temptation could manifest. In the absence of temptation, the choice which would lead to the highest good would have been made.
If, on the other hand, it is maintained that Adam and Eve were already created with the full set of ego-desires, then this would have had to include the desire to be separated from God, which would have to have been stronger than the desire to remain with God. If this was the original desire, then from whence did it arise?
You see, for me, all these things need to make sense, they must have some grounding in reason. I am more than willing to be open to accepting propositions without evidence as long as they are reasonable, but a proposition which is lacking in both evidence and reason stretches the bounds of credibility to breaking point.
Believing that one is more superior or better than others, doesn't that qualify as vanity?
That is precisely what I said, so we are in agreement here.
(More later)
We are in partial agreement, God gave man and woman the freedom to choose, He did not create a race of physical beings to to be without a mind. He created man in His image, if they had chose life over knowledge they would have realized the mind of God, and they could have had eternal life on earth. They made the mistake and chose to be tempted by the lie, from the father of lies. Man and woman had a choice and they made it.
All God wanted was for man and woman to worship Him freely, of their own free will, and He would have provided for them.
It's hard at first to get a handle on this, but once you do it will just amaze you to your very inner being. This is something that is just not that simple to grasp without actually going through it yourself.
It may sound unfair, but the battle is between God and Satan, and we got caught in the middle.
Why would God bother battling a being like the Satan as depicted in the Bible when He could do with him whatever He wills, whenever He wills?
“Is God willing to prevent evil, but not able?
Then he is not omnipotent.
Is he able, but not willing?
Then he is malevolent.
Is he both able and willing?
Then whence cometh evil?
Is he neither able nor willing?
Then why call him God?”
The Euthyphro dilemma is found in Plato's dialogue Euthyphro, in which Socrates asks Euthyphro: "Is the pious (τὸ ὅσιον) loved by the gods because it is pious, or is it pious because it is loved by the gods?" (10a)
The dilemma has had a major effect on the philosophical theism of the monotheistic religions, but in a modified form: "Is what is morally good commanded by God because it is morally good, or is it morally good because it is commanded by God?" This question has presented a problem for theists ever since Plato's original discussion, and it continues to be an object of theological and philosophical discussion today.
Originally posted by hawaii50th
Originally posted by mysticnoon
Regarding Original Sin, many of the eastern mystic traditions have quite a different perception.
The "original sin" with which man was originally born into this world and still carries within themselves was the seed of desire for self-realization, the desire to know and experience the truth of existence, the soul or self, and all of Reality.
Without this seed of desire, there would be no questioning of who or why we are, no philosophy, no science, no urge to gain knowledge or understanding, no seeking for God or higher mysteries.
In the light of this perspective, it does not make sense that any being or person would sacrifice themselves for the sake of this "Original Sin", because it is this very original sin which propels the soul to seek answers in religions.
First of all, we need to think in a spiritual way and not in human terms. As humans we have limitations, God is Spirit, He has knowledge and understanding that goes beyond our own understanding.
In the garden of Eden, there were two choices, one was knowledge, and the other was life. Knowledge is what we have today, Life is what we could have had where there would have been no sorrow, hate, war, violence, and so on. It would have been perfect, we would be able to talk to God directly, and He would have been among us.
The temptation of knowledge is for us to become vain, and arrogant and wanting to be as gods to control our own destiny and knowing what good and evil is, do you understand my meaning, no harmony.
The angel Lucifer was one of God's creation, Lucifer was the most beautiful of all the angels, and he had great powers. All of it went to his head, he developed a tremendous ego, and rebelled against God. Lucifer when God banished him from the heavenly places(different dimensions, the Universe, and Heaven itself) made him very angry at God. Now Lucifer in his anger and ego wanted to destroy everything God had created, especially man.
In fact if Lucifer could destroy man, than that would include the earth, another one of God's creation.
Lucifer influenced many other angels to follow him and this is why we are having and always had so much turmoil on this earth. It is a battle of wits between Satan and God, and God will prevail, after all He is the Creator.
Our struggle in life is between the forces of light(good) and darkness(evil), we are influenced by the bad but we can be protected if we accept the good.
If Satan is "allowed" to tempt man, then doesn't Satan live within the Will of God? Also, if Satan has chosen the vocation of tempting man, then one would assume that he also enjoys it, so why would he wish to destroy the only source of his enjoyment? This still makes no sense to me.
So God allows Satan to do this thankless temptation task, then annhilates him when he no longer has use for him?
Religious cosmologies?
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by mysticnoon
The original sin was believing that we could be separate from god.
We are the only species on the planet that has come up with such a ridiculous idea. And look what this idea has turned us into.
Together Satan and his demons will be locked away with the souls of men to be tormented, I know to you it doesn't make sense, but when you got nothing to lose and nothing to gain irrationality has a way of stepping in.
Have you ever heard of a book called, "The Screwtape Letters", by C.S. Lewis? This book opens up the imagination to get a clue on how the devil thinks.
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by mysticnoon
The original sin was believing that we could be separate from god.
We are the only species on the planet that has come up with such a ridiculous idea. And look what this idea has turned us into.
You are limiting your mind with human intellect, you can never get the scope of God's mind as long as you live in the box of man's own intellect. We are limited to our thinking without making the spiritual connection to God, it is impossible to even begin to understand.
In the end, I don't think a lot of people want to accept the fact or idea that there is a God.
They don't want to accept the fact that they are arrogant in their thinking.
They don't want to admit that they are limited to their grasp on a higher power who is God.
It is beyond comprehension by most people and that's the way it stands. These are the last days, never in all history has there been this large amount of a rejection of God, and Christ.
I agree that the intellect alone is limited in its capacity to understand the nature of God. However, if we discard reason in the search for truth, then how are we to discern fact from fantasy, illusion from reality, good from bad, and so forth?
I think you will find that those who accept the idea of God are more likely in the majority in the world, at least according to most estimates that I could source online.
And you have never encountered a believer in God who is arrogant in their thinking?
Ironically, the ones who do admit to a limitation in their ability to grasp God are those who already believe.
"These are the last days" is a warning which has been repeated by your christian brethren since the time of Christ. These last days have stretched into centuries and millenia, and I am convinced they will stretch out for many more.
As to rejection of God, I think it is more the dogmatic religions which may be being rejected, and not God as a universal concept.
We have been in the last days since Jesus Christ ascended to heaven. This is the part that many don't understand. Time is irrelevant, to God a day is as a thousand years and a thousand years is as a day.
Originally posted by mysticnoon
reply to post by hawaii50th
We have been in the last days since Jesus Christ ascended to heaven. This is the part that many don't understand. Time is irrelevant, to God a day is as a thousand years and a thousand years is as a day.
I follow what you are saying. However, the phrase, "in the last days", is commonly understood as being imminent, or occuring within this generation at the most. So to use the "last days" phrase without that thousand years delineation is, at best, misleading.
Of course, it is not nearly as threatening to people to say we could be within the last few thousand years of our world as we know it, so I understand why this "last days" tactic is preferred.edit on 19-3-2011 by mysticnoon because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by bogomil
Quote from Hawaii:
["There has been discoveries by science that the laws of physics are not what they thought it was. Now their writing new laws, discovering a new laws of physics."]
Such as?
Quote: ["Many scientist have admitted that there is a God. "]
Who?
Quote: ["Galileo wanted to use science to prove the existence of God, but the church wouldn't let him because of their(the churches) ignorance, maybe not, maybe they wanted to hide the real truth to continue to control the people with their Roman Catholic ideas and beliefs."]
A few things have happened in science since then. Maybe it would be more relevant to bring the whole subject up-to-date, before any pseudo-science or pseudo-philosophy-of-science emerge.