It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Preliminary analysis of seismograph records of the devastating magnitude 6.3 earthquake on Tuesday show that it was just 9 km from the centre of Christchurch on a buried fault oriented roughly east-west.
There is no obvious structure directly connecting the faults that ruptured in the September’s magnitude 7.1 earthquake with the fault that generated the magnitude 6.3 event. On the contrary, precise aftershock relocations suggest that at least two north-east/south-west trending faults lie between the two and that there is no evidence from the earthquake data of an extension of the Greendale Fault
Originally posted by grantbeed
reply to post by latitude39
Times ahead shall be interesting. I can tell you one thing, No-one down here thinks this is the end of it. Like after last Septembers quake, everyone had a bad gut feeling there would be worse, and they were all correct.
Quake could have been magnified by volcanic rock
Tuesday's quake was part of the aftershock sequence which followed September's magnitude 7.1 quake near Darfield, 40km west of the city, GNS Science earthquake geologist Kelvin Berryman said today
Mr Berryman said part of the reason why the quake was felt so strongly could have been because it reflected off volcanic rock near its epicentre
Seismic energy travelled in waves and could be reflected off hard surfaces, much like sound waves, he said
"With the epicentre of Tuesday's earthquake in the Port Hills, a large amount of energy could have been reflected off hard volcanic rock at depth. This would have compounded the impact of the earthquake at the surface".
He said there had been an unusual number of aftershocks following Tuesday's quake but these were beginning to weaken and become less frequent but warned there were often anomalies, "as the magnitude 6.3 earthquake had shown".
Originally posted by grantbeed
Interesting article about how the quakes magnitude could have been magnified by the hard volcanic rock along the Port Hills,
Quake could have been magnified by volcanic rock
Tuesday's quake was part of the aftershock sequence which followed September's magnitude 7.1 quake near Darfield, 40km west of the city, GNS Science earthquake geologist Kelvin Berryman said today
Mr Berryman said part of the reason why the quake was felt so strongly could have been because it reflected off volcanic rock near its epicentre
Seismic energy travelled in waves and could be reflected off hard surfaces, much like sound waves, he said
"With the epicentre of Tuesday's earthquake in the Port Hills, a large amount of energy could have been reflected off hard volcanic rock at depth. This would have compounded the impact of the earthquake at the surface".
He said there had been an unusual number of aftershocks following Tuesday's quake but these were beginning to weaken and become less frequent but warned there were often anomalies, "as the magnitude 6.3 earthquake had shown".
nz.news.yahoo.com...